| Literature DB >> 30258620 |
Gires Boungo Teboukeu1, Fabrice Tonfack Djikeng1,2, Mathilde Julie Klang1, Mallampalli Sri Lakshmi Karuna3, Hilaire Macaire Womeni1.
Abstract
Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the extraction of phenolic antioxidants of Coffea robusta leaves and to evaluate the effect of optimized extract and storage time on the stability of palm olein. The optimization of the extraction process was conducted, and the total polyphenol value of 127.06 mg GAE/g and scavenging activity of 90.65% were obtained under optimal extraction conditions. The phenolic antioxidants of the optimized extract and their thermal stability were determined using HPLC-DAD (high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector) and Rancimat test, respectively. The effect of concentration of the optimized extract and storage time on the stability of palm olein was also evaluated. Results showed that the optimized extract contains gallic acid, vanillic acid, cafeic acid and was efficient in retarding palm olein oxidation during 32 months at room temperature. Coffea robusta can be recommended as good source of antioxidants for stabilization of palm olein.Entities:
Keywords: Coffea robusta; optimized extract; palm olein; response surface methodology; storage
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258620 PMCID: PMC6145301 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Coded and real levels of independent variables used in the RSM design for the optimization process of extraction
| Independent variables | Coded levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‐α (−1.73) | −1 | 0 | +1 | + α (1.73) | |
| Real levels | |||||
| Temperature (°C), X1 | 25 | 31 | 40 | 49 | 55 |
| Extraction time (hours), X2 | 6 | 9.35 | 15 | 20.35 | 24 |
| Methanol concentration(%), X3 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 80 | 100 |
Experimental design, observed, and predicted values for optimized extraction of phenolic antioxidant from coffee leaves extract
| No. | Temperature (°C) | Time (h) | Methanol (%) | Experimental total polyphenols (mg GAE/g) | Predicted total polyphenols | ExperimentalAntioxidant activity (% inhibition) | Predicted antioxidant activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | EY1 | PY1 | EY2 | PY2 | |
| 01 | 0 (40) | 0 (15) | 0 (50) | 102.78 ± 0.45 | 102.81 | 71.49 ± 0.70 | 71.48 |
| 02 | 0 (40) | 0 (15) | 0 (50) | 101.56 ± 1.02 | 102.81 | 72.33 ± 1.12 | 71.36 |
| 03 | −1 (31) | −1 (9.35) | −1 (20) | 72.01 ± 1.78 | 77.96 | 51.86 ± 1.01 | 52.61 |
| 04 | +1 (49) | −1 (9.35) | −1 (20) | 70.01 ± 1.48 | 74.40 | 74.82 ± 0.09 | 75.12 |
| 05 | −1 (31) | −1 (9.35) | +1 (80) | 97.80 ± 1.56 | 109.78 | 85.80 ± 0.14 | 87.14 |
| 06 | +1 (49) | −1 (9.35) | +1 (80) | 108.65 ± 1.98 | 117.67 | 89.44 ± 0.78 | 89.17 |
| 07 | −1 (31) | +1 (20.35) | −1 (20) | 79.97 ± 0.20 | 76.21 | 75.88 ± 0.75 | 74.45 |
| 08 | +1 (49) | +1 (20.35) | −1 (20) | 76.03 ± 0.00 | 69.31 | 78.70 ± 0.96 | 79.04 |
| 09 | −1 (31) | +1 (20.35) | +1 (80) | 106.05 ± 0.75 | 106.92 | 81.04 ± 1.15 | 81.46 |
| 10 | +1 (49) | +1 (20.35) | +1 (80) | 112.15 ± 0.16 | 111.46 | 85.09 ± 1.25 | 85.47 |
| 11 | − α (25) | 0 (15) | 0 (50) | 109.17 ± 1.88 | 102.77 | 70.34 ± 1.14 | 71.01 |
| 12 | + α (55) | 0 (15) | 0 (50) | 104.64 ± 1.46 | 103.60 | 73.83 ± 1.45 | 72.89 |
| 13 | 0 (40) | 0 (15) | − α (0) | 33.59 ± 1.26 | 36.20 | 60.01 ± 1.03 | 60.78 |
| 14 | 0 (40) | 0 (15) | + α (100) | 108.47 ± 0.21 | 98.41 | 91.80 ± 2.78 | 91.72 |
| 15 | 0 (40) | − α (06) | 0 (50) | 129.54 ± 0.19 | 113.44 | 77.86 ± 2.21 | 77.56 |
| 16 | 0 (40) | +α (24) | 0 (50) | 98.10 ± 0.48 | 106.75 | 68.09 ± 0.78 | 68.59 |
Coded and real levels of independent variables used in the RSM design for study effect of extract concentration and storage time on the oxidative stability of palm olein
| Independent variables | Coded levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −α (−1.68) | −1 | 0 | +1 | + α (1.68) | |
| Real levels | |||||
| Extract Concentration (ppm), X1 | 500 | 720 | 1250 | 1780 | 2000 |
| Storage time (Days), X2 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 39 | 46 |
Experimental design, observed and predicted values of parameter effect on the oxidative stability of palm olein during storage
| No. | Extract (ppm) | Storage time (days) | Experimental Peroxide value (ppm) | Predicted Peroxide value (ppm) | Experimental | Predicted | Experimental TOTOX value | Predicted TOTOX value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | EY1 | PY1 | EY2 | PY2 | EY3 | PY3 | |
| 01 | 0 (1250) | 0 (23) | 13.20 ± 0.45 | 13.20 | 2.26 ± 0.04 | 2.26 | 28.68 ± 0.94 | 28.68 |
| 02 | 0 (1250) | 0 (23) | 13.20 ± 1.04 | 13.20 | 2.26 ± 0.12 | 2.26 | 28.68 ± 2.20 | 28.68 |
| 03 | 1 (1780) | 1 (39) | 15.24 ± 0.98 | 16.99 | 2.94 ± 0.08 | 2.80 | 33.43 ± 2.04 | 36.78 |
| 04 | 1 (1780) | −1 (7) | 3.92 ± 0.99 | 4.31 | 2.23 ± 0.06 | 2.08 | 10.07 ± 2.04 | 10.72 |
| 05 | −1 (720) | 1 (39) | 23.98 ± 0.12 | 25.20 | 3.10 ± 0.19 | 3.02 | 51.07 ± 0.43 | 53.42 |
| 06 | −1 (720) | −1 (7) | 3.66 ± 0.13 | 3.52 | 2.58 ± 0.00 | 2.50 | 9.91 ± 0.26 | 9.55 |
| 07 | α (2000) | 0 (23) | 9.25 ± 1.46 | 8.06 | 2.19 ± 0.26 | 2.35 | 20.70 ± 3.70 | 18.49 |
| 08 | −α (500) | 0 (23) | 13.73 ± 1.03 | 13.31 | 2.73 ± 0.30 | 2.80 | 30.21 ± 2.36 | 29.42 |
| 09 | 0 (1250) | α (46) | 28.23 ± 0.63 | 26.47 | 2.95 ± 0.05 | 3.06 | 59.42 ± 1.31 | 56.01 |
| 10 | 0 (1250) | −α (0) | 2.03 ± 0.61 | 2.18 | 2.08 ± 0.10 | 2.19 | 6.14 ± 1.32 | 6.56 |
Regression coefficients (RC), p values, and coefficient of multiple determinations (R 2) for total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of coffee leaves extract following CCD
| Total polyphenols | Antioxidant activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC |
| RC |
| |
| X1 : Temperature (°C) | −0.3831 | 0.9405 | 0.481 | 0.1449 |
| X2 : Time (hours) | −2.1311 | 0.5541 | 2.124 | 0.9231 |
| X3 : Methanol fraction (%) | 1.6123 | 0.0011 | 0.766 | 0.0029 |
| X1X1 | 0.0016 | 0.9735 | 0.012 | 0.645 |
| X1 X2 | 0.0168 | 0.8469 | −0.0498 | 0.314 |
| X1 X3 | 0.0105 | 0.5160 | −0.008 | 0.353 |
| X2X2 | 0.0851 | 0.5286 | 0.043 | 0.548 |
| X2 X3 | −0.0016 | 0.9486 | −0.028 | 0.0852 |
| X3X3 | −0.0139 | 0.0173 | 0.0026 | 0.301 |
| Constant | 72.7127 | 13.40 | ||
|
| 0.895 | 0.849 | ||
|
| 0.738 | 0.624 | ||
Independent variable that significantly (p < 0.05) affect the response.
Figure 1Response surfaces showing the effect of temperature and solvent fraction (a), extraction time and solvent fraction (b) on the total phenolic content of Coffea robusta leaves extract
Figure 2Response surfaces showing the effect of temperature and solvent fraction (a), extraction time and solvent fraction (b) on the antioxidant activity of Coffea robusta leaves extract
Predictive and experimental values under optimum conditions for maximum total phenolic content and antioxidant activity
| Responses | Temperature (°C) | Extraction time (hr) | Methanol fraction (%) | Predicted value | Experimental value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total polyphenols (mg GAE/g) | 53.70 | 5.60 | 79.66 | 127.06 ± 0.0a | 125.35 ± 3.46a |
| Antioxidant activity (% inhibition) | 47.70 | 5.6 | 100 | 90.65 ± 0.0a | 89.12 ± 0.20a |
Means within each row with same superscripts are not significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Figure 3HPLC‐DAD Chromatogram of standards (A) (1 = Gallic acid, 2 = Vanillic acid, 3 = Cafeic acid, 4 = Ferulic acid, 5 = Ellagic acid), and Coffea robusta leaves extract (B) (1 = Gallic acid, 2 = Vanillic acid, 3 = Cafeic acid)
Induction times and protection factors of oil samples during storage at 110 °C
| Sample | Induction time (hr) | Protection factor |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 23.19 ± 0.12a | 1.000 ± 0.00a |
| PO + BHT200 ppm | 24.41 ± 0.23b | 1.052 ± 0.007b |
| OP + Cof rob2000 | 27.27 ± 0.51e | 1.170 ± 0.008f |
| OP + Cof rob1780 | 27.12 ± 0.47e | 1.169 ± 0.0045e |
| OP + Cof rob1250 | 26.61 ± 0.36d | 1.147 ± 0.004d |
| OP + Cof rob720 | 25.36 ± 0.29c | 1.093 ± 0.005c |
| OP + Cof rob500 | 23.79 ± 0.47ab | 1.025 ± 0.003b |
Values of columns with different letters differ significantly p < 0.05. (Control: Palm olein without antioxidant; PO + BHT200 ppm: palm olein containing BHT as antioxidant at concentration of 200 ppm; PO + Cof rob2000 ppm: palm olein supplemented with Coffea robusta extract at concentration 2000 ppm).
Regression coefficients (RC), p values, and coefficient of multiple determinations (R 2) for peroxide value, p‐Anisidine value, and TOTOX value following CCD
| Peroxide value |
| TOTOX value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR |
| CR |
| CR |
| |
| X1 : Extract (ppm) | 0.0153 | 0.028 | −0.0026 | 0.102 | 0.027 | 0.020 |
| X2 : Storage time (days) | 0.775 | 0.0001 | −0.036 | 0.014 | 1.498 | 0.0001 |
| X1 X1 | −0.000005 | 0.119 | 8.90E‐7 | 0.066 | −0.000008 | 0.142 |
| X1 X2 | −0.0002 | 0.044 | 0.000005 | 0.660 | −0.0005 | 0.039 |
| X2 X2 | 0.0014 | 0.625 | 0.001 | 0.050 | 0.0041 | 0.454 |
| Constant | −9.060 | 4.133 | −13.437 | |||
|
| 98.53 | 88.68 | 98.72 | |||
|
| 96.71 | 76.26 | 97.12 | |||
Independent variable that significantly (p < 0.05) affect the response.
Figure 4Contour plots showing the effect of storage time and extract concentration on the peroxide value (a), p‐Anisidine value (b) and TOTOX value (c) of palm olein during storage