| Literature DB >> 31067742 |
Qingying Luo1, Min Wu2, Yanan Sun3, Junxia Lv4, Yu Zhang5, Hongfu Cao6, Dingtao Wu7, Derong Lin8, Qing Zhang9, Yuntao Liu10, Wen Qin11, Hong Chen12.
Abstract
The mucilage from Brasenia schreberi (BS) exhibits various biological activities, including antialgal, antibacterial, soluble-fiber properties, and excellent lubricating behavior. Thus, the extraction and wide use of mucilage in the food industry are crucial. In this study, the high-speed shear-assisted extraction of mucilage from BS was optimized by using response surface methodology (RSM). The optimal extraction conditions were as follows: Extraction temperature of 82 °C, extraction time of 113 min, liquid-solid ratio of 47 mL/g, and shear speed of 10,000 rpm. Under these conditions, the actual yield of BS mucilage was 71.67%, which highly matched the yield (73.44%) predicted by the regression model. Then, the BS mucilage extract was powdered to prepare the capsule, and the excipients of the capsule were screened using a single-factor test to improve the disintegration property and flowability. The final capsule formulation, which consisted of: 39% BS mucilage powder (60 meshes); 50% microcrystalline cellulose (60 meshes) as the filler; both 10% sodium starch glycolate and PVPP XL-10 (3:1, 60 meshes) as the disintegrant; both 1% colloidal silicon dioxide and sodium stearyl fumarate (1:1, 100 meshes) as the glidant by weight; were used for preparing the weights of a 320 mg/grain of capsule with 154.7 ± 0.95 mg/g polysaccharide content. Overall, the optimized extraction process had a high extraction rate for BS mucilage and the capsule formulation was designed reasonably.Entities:
Keywords: Brasenia schreberi; capsule; high-speed shear-assisted extraction; mucilage; optimal extraction
Year: 2019 PMID: 31067742 PMCID: PMC6571674 DOI: 10.3390/polym11050822
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
A CCD matrix of the four variables in coded units and response values for the extraction yield of BS mucilage.
| Run | A | B | C | D | Extraction Temperature (°C) | Liquid-Solid Ratio | Extraction Time (min) | Shear Speed (rpm) | Extraction Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 80 | 40 | 140 | 8000 | 54.755 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 90 | 30 | 80 | 10,000 | 54.450 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 90 | 50 | 80 | 10,000 | 56.776 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 80 | 40 | 100 | 4000 | 59.878 |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 40 | 100 | 8000 | 59.549 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 40 | 100 | 8000 | 68.409 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 80 | 40 | 60 | 8000 | 47.141 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 70 | 30 | 80 | 6000 | 50.878 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 80 | 40 | 100 | 12,000 | 69.490 |
| 10 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 70 | 30 | 120 | 10,000 | 52.734 |
| 11 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 8000 | 52.123 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 90 | 50 | 80 | 6000 | 57.552 |
| 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 60 | 100 | 8000 | 61.735 |
| 14 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 70 | 30 | 120 | 6000 | 49.162 |
| 15 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 70 | 50 | 80 | 10,000 | 53.040 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 40 | 100 | 8000 | 69.490 |
| 17 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 70 | 50 | 120 | 10,000 | 67.469 |
| 18 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 70 | 50 | 120 | 6000 | 56.917 |
| 19 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 20 | 100 | 8000 | 32.736 |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 90 | 50 | 120 | 6000 | 59.714 |
| 21 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 70 | 30 | 80 | 10,000 | 47.306 |
| 22 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 90 | 30 | 120 | 6000 | 45.755 |
| 23 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 90 | 30 | 80 | 6000 | 56.142 |
| 24 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 70 | 50 | 80 | 6000 | 48.387 |
| 25 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 90 | 30 | 120 | 10,000 | 56.612 |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 90 | 50 | 120 | 10,000 | 68.080 |
Variance analysis of response surface quadratic model for the extraction of BS mucilage.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1739.21 | 14 | 124.23 | 13.09 | <0.0001 | ** |
| A-Temperature | 80.81 | 1 | 80.81 | 8.52 | 0.0140 | * |
| B-Liquid-solid ratio | 531.04 | 1 | 531.04 | 55.97 | <0.0001 | ** |
| C-Time | 92.59 | 1 | 92.59 | 9.76 | 0.0097 | ** |
| D-Shear speed | 109.16 | 1 | 109.16 | 11.51 | 0.0060 | ** |
| AB | 0.74 | 1 | 0.74 | 0.077 | 0.7859 | |
| AC | 28.70 | 1 | 28.70 | 3.03 | 0.1098 | |
| AD | 0.15 | 1 | 0.15 | 0.016 | 0.9022 | |
| BC | 104.74 | 1 | 104.74 | 11.04 | 0.0068 | ** |
| BD | 11.61 | 1 | 11.61 | 1.22 | 0.2922 | |
| CD | 75.40 | 1 | 75.40 | 7.95 | 0.0167 | * |
| A2 | 180.33 | 1 | 180.33 | 19.01 | 0.0011 | ** |
| B2 | 502.27 | 1 | 502.27 | 52.94 | <0.0001 | ** |
| C2 | 343.50 | 1 | 343.50 | 36.20 | <0.0001 | ** |
| D2 | 17.53 | 1 | 17.53 | 1.85 | 0.2013 | |
| Residual | 104.37 | 11 | 9.49 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 103.78 | 10 | 10.38 | 17.76 | 0.1828 | Not significant |
| Pure Error | 0.58 | 1 | 0.58 | |||
| Cor Total | 1843.57 | 25 |
** Means significant differences (P < 0.01), * Means significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 1The 3D response surface and 2D contour plots showing the effects of extraction factors on the yield of BS mucilage. (A) 3D response surface and 2D contour plots showing the effects of liquid–solid ratio and extraction temperature on the yield of BS mucilage; (B) 3D response surface and 2D contour plots showing the effects of extraction time and extraction temperature on the yield of BS mucilage; (C) 3D response surface and 2D contour plots showing the effects of shear speed and extraction temperature on the yield of BS mucilage. (D) 3D response surface and 2D contour plots showing the effects of extraction time and liquid–solid ration on the yield of BS mucilage. (E) 3D response surface and 2D contour plots showing the effects of shear speed and liquid–solid ratio on the yield of BS mucilage. (F) 3D response surface and 2D contour plots showing the effects of shear speed and extraction time on the yield of BS mucilage.
Figure 2The image of the powder of BS mucilage extract.
The effects of high-temperature, high-humidity and strong light exposure on the weight and polysaccharide content of BS mucilage.
| Time (d) | Temperature | Humidity | Illuminance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (Powder weight) | 4.7494 g | 4.3586 g | 4.3205 g |
| 5 (Powder weight) | 4.8335 g | 5.6601 g | 4.7181 g |
| 10 (Powder weight) | 5.0036 g | 7.5229 g | 5.1489 g |
| 0 (Polysaccharide content) | 52.97% | 53.05% | 53.02% |
| 5 (Polysaccharide content) | 52.68% | 52.69% | 52.79% |
| 10 (Polysaccharide content) | 52.54% | 52.67% | 52.87% |
The screening results of the disintegrants.
| Disintegrants | For-1 | For-2 | For-3 | For-4 | For-5 | For-6 | For-7 | For-8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Else (mg) | 30.4 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 30.4 | 30.0 |
| CCS (mg) | 0.8 | — | 0.8 | — | — | 0.8 | — | — |
| CMS-Na (mg) | — | 0.8 | — | 0.8 | — | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| PVPP XL-10 (mg) | 0.8 | 0.8 | — | — | 0.8 | — | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| PVPP XL (mg) | — | — | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | — | — | — |
| Disintegration time (min) | >15 | 11 | >15 | 13 | >15 | 13 | 10 | 7 |
The screening results of the fillers.
| Fillers | For-1 | For-2 | For-3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCC (Shanhe) (mg) | 160 | — | — |
| MCC (JRS) (mg) | — | 160 | — |
| Calcium hydrophosphate (mg) | — | — | 160 |
| Disintegration time (min) | 26 | 20 | 35 |
| Angle of repose (°) | 41.5 | 39.3 | 42.9 |
The screening results of glidants.
| Glidants | For-1 | For-2 | For-3 | For-4 | For-5 | For-6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colloidal silicon dioxide (mg) | — | 1.6 | 1.28 | 1.6 | 1.28 | — |
| Magnesium stearate (mg) | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.92 | — | — | — |
| Sodium stearyl fumarate (mg) | — | — | — | 1.6 | 1.92 | 3.2 |
| Angle of repose (°) | 40.1 | 38.5 | 39.7 | 37.8 | 38.9 | 39.7 |
Evaluation of the capsule by BS mucilage.
| Projects | Sample-1 | Sample-2 | Sample-3 | Mean Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water content (%) | 4.56 | 5.22 | 4.67 | 4.81 ± 0.402 |
| Weight (g) | 0.3276 | 0.3261 | 0.3282 | 0.32729 ± 0.007 |
| Polysaccharide content (mg/g) | 163.2 | 144.4 | 156.5 | 154.7 ± 0.95 |
Figure 3Isolation of polysaccharide from capsules made by BS mucilage by thin layer chromatography and its visualization under far UV light. (A) TLC image with dichloromethane:methanol:water = 8:1:0.1 as the developing solvent; (B) TLC image with ethyl acetate:methanol:water = 8:1:0.5 as the developing agent. 1–3, 4 and 5 refer to BS mucilage capsule samples, quercetin reference and excipient reference, respectively.