Literature DB >> 30256504

Differential brain mechanisms for processing distracting information in task-relevant and -irrelevant dimensions in visual search.

Ping Wei1,2, Hongbo Yu3, Hermann J Müller4, Stefan Pollmann5, Xiaolin Zhou3,6,7.   

Abstract

A crucial function of our goal-directed behavior is to select task-relevant targets among distractor stimuli, some of which may share properties with the target and thus compete for attentional selection. Here, by applying functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to a visual search task in which a target was embedded in an array of distractors that were homogeneous or heterogeneous along the task-relevant (orientation or form) and/or task-irrelevant (color) dimensions, we demonstrate that for both (orientation) feature search and (form) conjunction search, the fusiform gyrus is involved in processing the task-irrelevant color information, while the bilateral frontal eye fields (FEF), the cortex along the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and the left junction of intraparietal and transverse occipital sulci (IPTO) are involved in processing task-relevant distracting information, especially for target-absent trials. Moreover, in conjunction (but not in feature) search, activity in these frontoparietal regions is affected by stimulus heterogeneity along the task-irrelevant dimension: heterogeneity of the task-irrelevant information increases the activity in these regions only when the task-relevant information is homogeneous, not when it is heterogeneous. These findings suggest that differential neural mechanisms are involved in processing task-relevant and task-irrelevant dimensions of the searched-for objects. In addition, they show that the top-down task set plays a dominant role in determining whether or not task-irrelevant information can affect the processing of the task-relevant dimension in the frontoparietal regions.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  conjunction search; fMRI; feature search; task-irrelevant; task-relevant; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30256504      PMCID: PMC8022275          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  74 in total

1.  Distinct neural substrates for visual search amongst spatial versus temporal distractors.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Vincent Walsh; Christopher D Frith; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-07

2.  The role of categorization in visual search for orientation.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; S R Friedman-Hill; M I Stewart; K M O'Connell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Carmel Mevorach; Glyn W Humphreys; Lilach Shalev
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-14       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Neural basis of interaction between target presence and display homogeneity in visual search: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Hermann J Müller; Stefan Pollmann; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Jianguo Lü; Hermann J Müller; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Right hemisphere dominance during spatial selective attention and target detection occurs outside the dorsal frontoparietal network.

Authors:  Gordon L Shulman; Daniel L W Pope; Serguei V Astafiev; Mark P McAvoy; Abraham Z Snyder; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Common and distinct mechanisms of cognitive flexibility in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Chobok Kim; Nathan F Johnson; Sara E Cilles; Brian T Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Individual attentional selection capacities are reflected in interhemispheric connectivity of the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Ralph Weidner; Katharina Moos; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differential brain mechanisms for processing distracting information in task-relevant and -irrelevant dimensions in visual search.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Hongbo Yu; Hermann J Müller; Stefan Pollmann; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Role of the dorsal attention network in distracter suppression based on features.

Authors:  Armien Lanssens; Gloria Pizzamiglio; Dante Mantini; Celine R Gillebert
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.065

3.  Multiple processes independently predict motor learning.

Authors:  Christopher M Perry; Tarkeshwar Singh; Kayla G Springer; Adam T Harrison; Alexander C McLain; Troy M Herter
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.