Literature DB >> 20219998

Right hemisphere dominance during spatial selective attention and target detection occurs outside the dorsal frontoparietal network.

Gordon L Shulman1, Daniel L W Pope, Serguei V Astafiev, Mark P McAvoy, Abraham Z Snyder, Maurizio Corbetta.   

Abstract

Spatial selective attention is widely considered to be right hemisphere dominant. Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, however, have reported bilateral blood-oxygenation-level-dependent responses in dorsal frontoparietal regions during anticipatory shifts of attention to a location (Kastner et al., 1999; Corbetta et al., 2000; Hopfinger et al., 2000). Right-lateralized activity has mainly been reported in ventral frontoparietal regions for shifts of attention to an unattended target stimulus (Arrington et al., 2000; Corbetta et al., 2000). However, clear conclusions cannot be drawn from these studies because hemispheric asymmetries were not assessed using direct voxelwise comparisons of activity in left and right hemispheres. Here, we used this technique to measure hemispheric asymmetries during shifts of spatial attention evoked by a peripheral cue stimulus and during target detection at the cued location. Stimulus-driven shifts of spatial attention in both visual fields evoked right-hemisphere dominant activity in temporoparietal junction (TPJ). Target detection at the attended location produced a more widespread right hemisphere dominance in frontal, parietal, and temporal cortex, including the TPJ region asymmetrically activated during shifts of spatial attention. However, hemispheric asymmetries were not observed during either shifts of attention or target detection in the dorsal frontoparietal regions (anterior precuneus, medial intraparietal sulcus, frontal eye fields) that showed the most robust activations for shifts of attention. Therefore, right hemisphere dominance during stimulus-driven shifts of spatial attention and target detection reflects asymmetries in cortical regions that are largely distinct from the dorsal frontoparietal network involved in the control of selective attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20219998      PMCID: PMC2872555          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4085-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  88 in total

1.  Spatial maps in frontal and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Martin I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Remapping attentional priorities: differential contribution of superior parietal lobule and intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Pascal Molenberghs; Marsel M Mesulam; Ronald Peeters; Rik R C Vandenberghe
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Dissociation of stimulus relevance and saliency factors during shifts of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Iole Indovina; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Left unilateral neglect as a disconnection syndrome.

Authors:  Paolo Bartolomeo; Michel Thiebaut de Schotten; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Jascha D Swisher; Mark A Halko; Lotfi B Merabet; Stephanie A McMains; David C Somers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Selective tuning of the blood oxygenation level-dependent response during simple target detection dissociates human frontoparietal subregions.

Authors:  Adam Hampshire; John Duncan; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Spatial re-orienting of visual attention along the horizontal or the vertical axis.

Authors:  E Macaluso; F Patria
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Functionally specific reorganization in human premotor cortex.

Authors:  Jacinta O'Shea; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Danielle Trief; Silke Göbel; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Changing human visual field organization from early visual to extra-occipital cortex.

Authors:  Anthony I Jack; Gaurav H Patel; Serguei V Astafiev; Abraham Z Snyder; Erbil Akbudak; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  202 in total

1.  Brain networks' functional connectivity separates aphasic deficits in stroke.

Authors:  Antonello Baldassarre; Nicholas V Metcalf; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Large-scale changes in network interactions as a physiological signature of spatial neglect.

Authors:  Antonello Baldassarre; Lenny Ramsey; Carl L Hacker; Alicia Callejas; Serguei V Astafiev; Nicholas V Metcalf; Kristi Zinn; Jennifer Rengachary; Abraham Z Snyder; Alex R Carter; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks.

Authors:  Nicholas E DiQuattro; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Human consciousness and its relationship to social neuroscience: A novel hypothesis.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.065

5.  Causal interactions in attention networks predict behavioral performance.

Authors:  Xiaotong Wen; Li Yao; Yijun Liu; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural correlates of focused attention during a brief mindfulness induction.

Authors:  Janna Dickenson; Elliot T Berkman; Joanna Arch; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsu; Philip Tseng; Wei-Kuang Liang; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Benjamin Straube; David Wolk; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Individual Differences in Adult Reading Are Associated with Left Temporo-parietal to Dorsal Striatal Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Sanjay Achal; Fumiko Hoeft; Signe Bray
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Relationship between Stroop performance and resting state functional connectivity in cognitively normal older adults.

Authors:  Janet M Duchek; David A Balota; Jewell B Thomas; Abraham Z Snyder; Patrick Rich; Tammie L Benzinger; Anne M Fagan; David M Holtzman; John C Morris; Beau M Ances
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.