Literature DB >> 30255438

Geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging systems assessed using an open-source plugin for scientific image analysis.

Takahiro Aoyama1, Hidetoshi Shimizu2,3, Ikuo Shimizu4, Atsushi Teramoto5, Naoki Kaneda4, Kazuhiko Nakamura4, Masaru Nakamura4, Takeshi Kodaira2.   

Abstract

Tumor locations are commonly delineated by referring to magnetic resonance (MR) images. However, MR images have geometric distortions that cannot be completely corrected. This study aimed to investigate quantitatively uncorrectable error [residual error (RE)] with the use of an open-source plugin for scientific image analysis. The RE values were calculated by Fiji, which was enhanced by Image J image processing software. The results obtained with the open-source plugin for scientific image analysis agreed with the results obtained with the commercially available software. Obtaining detailed geometric distortion data for each facility and device could facilitate safe treatment because the homogeneous magnetic field in MR imaging varies across devices and over time. Therefore, using an open-source plugin for scientific image analysis may be an accurate and effective technique for evaluating the RE of MR imaging systems.

Keywords:  Image distortion; Magnetic resonance imaging; Open-source plugin for scientific image analysis; Residual error; Stereotactic radiation therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30255438     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-018-0477-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  16 in total

1.  Three-dimensional, T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the brain with a volumetric interpolated examination.

Authors:  Stephan G Wetzel; Glyn Johnson; Andrew G S Tan; Soonmee Cha; Edmond A Knopp; Vivian S Lee; David Thomasson; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part I: evaluation using a 3D phantom.

Authors:  Deming Wang; Wendy Strugnell; Gary Cowin; David M Doddrell; Richard Slaughter
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images.

Authors:  Lesley N Baldwin; Keith Wachowicz; Steven D Thomas; Ryan Rivest; B Gino Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  DNA labeling in vivo: quantification of epidermal stem cell chromatin content in whole mouse hair follicles using Fiji image processing software.

Authors:  Elisa Carrasco; María I Calvo; Jesús Espada
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

5.  Geometrical accuracy of a 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging unit in Gamma Knife surgery.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Chung K Lee; Bruce J Gerbi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  MRI simulation: end-to-end testing for prostate radiation therapy using geometric pelvic MRI phantoms.

Authors:  Jidi Sun; Jason Dowling; Peter Pichler; Fred Menk; David Rivest-Henault; Jonathan Lambert; Joel Parker; Jameen Arm; Leah Best; Jarad Martin; James W Denham; Peter B Greer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  MRI distortion: considerations for MRI based radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Amy Walker; Gary Liney; Peter Metcalfe; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.430

Review 8.  Spatial Precision in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Role of Geometric Distortion.

Authors:  Joseph Weygand; Clifton David Fuller; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Yao Ding; Jinzhong Yang; Ken-Pin Hwang; Jihong Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Detection of brain metastases from small cell lung cancer: consequences of changing imaging techniques (CT versus MRI).

Authors:  Tatjana Seute; Pieter Leffers; Guul P M ten Velde; Albert Twijnstra
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Stereotactic radiosurgery planning of vestibular schwannomas: Is MRI at 3 Tesla geometrically accurate?

Authors:  M A Schmidt; E J Wells; K Davison; A M Riddell; L Welsh; F Saran
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  <Editors' Choice> Evaluation of system-related magnetic resonance imaging geometric distortion in radiation therapy treatment planning: two approaches and effectiveness of three-dimensional distortion correction.

Authors:  Yutaka Kato; Kuniyasu Okudaira; Takeshi Kamomae; Motoki Kumagai; Youta Nagai; Toshiaki Taoka; Yoshiyuki Itoh; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.131

2.  Optimization of the image acquisition procedure in low-field MRI for non-destructive analysis of loin using predictive models.

Authors:  Daniel Caballero; Trinidad Pérez-Palacios; Andrés Caro; Mar Ávila; Teresa Antequera
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-06-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.