Literature DB >> 18503355

Geometrical accuracy of a 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging unit in Gamma Knife surgery.

Yoichi Watanabe1, Chung K Lee, Bruce J Gerbi.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors sought to evaluate and improve the geometrical accuracy of a 3-tesla magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit used for Gamma Knife surgery (GKS).
METHODS: To evaluate the geometrical accuracy of a Siemens Magnetom Trio 3-tesla MR imaging unit, two phantoms were used. Both phantoms were imaged with computed tomography (CT), a 1.5-tesla MR imaging unit (Siemens Avanto), and the 3-tesla MR imaging unit. A pair of orthogonal films was obtained with a radiotherapy simulator to validate the spatial coordinates of the marker positions determined with CT. The coordinates of the markers were measured using the GammaPlan treatment planning software. Magnetic resonance imaing was performed using three-dimensional (3D) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) and fast low-angle shot sequence (FLASH) pulse sequences. The voxel size was 1 x 1 x 1 mm3.
CONCLUSIONS: The root-mean-square error of MR images was 2 +/- 0.73 mm for 3D MPRAGE. The error was reduced to 1.5 +/- 0.64 mm for FLASH. The errors were decreased further by applying an image distortion correction method (the field-of-view filter) to the images acquired with FLASH. The mean errors were 1.3 +/- 0.39 mm and 1.5 +/- 0.77 mm for the two phantoms. The errors increased from 1 mm to 3.1 mm as the measurement points approached the caudal edge of the head coil (larger z value). Proper selection of a pulse sequence together with a geometrical distortion correction improved the geometrical accuracy of MR images. However, further study is needed to increase the geometrical accuracy of 3-tesla MR imaging units for radiosurgical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 18503355     DOI: 10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  5 in total

1.  Geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging systems assessed using an open-source plugin for scientific image analysis.

Authors:  Takahiro Aoyama; Hidetoshi Shimizu; Ikuo Shimizu; Atsushi Teramoto; Naoki Kaneda; Kazuhiko Nakamura; Masaru Nakamura; Takeshi Kodaira
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-25

2.  Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T compared with 1.5 T in small pituitary tumors for stereotactic radiosurgery planning.

Authors:  Hisato Nakazawa; Yuta Shibamoto; Takahiko Tsugawa; Yoshimasa Mori; Masami Nishio; Tomohiro Takami; Masataka Komori; Chisa Hashizume; Tatsuya Kobayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Reliability of stereotactic coordinates of 1.5-tesla and 3-tesla MRI in radiosurgery and functional neurosurgery.

Authors:  Hae Yu Kim; Sun-Il Lee; Seong Jin Jin; Sung-Chul Jin; Jung Soo Kim; Kyoung Dong Jeon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-03-31

4.  Estimation of optic nerve sheath diameter on an initial brain computed tomography scan can contribute prognostic information in traumatic brain injury patients.

Authors:  Aurélien Legrand; Patrick Jeanjean; Fanny Delanghe; Johann Peltier; Benoit Lecat; Hervé Dupont
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials.

Authors:  Hisato Nakazawa; Yoshimasa Mori; Osamu Yamamuro; Masataka Komori; Yuta Shibamoto; Yukio Uchiyama; Takahiko Tsugawa; Masahiro Hagiwara
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.724

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.