Linnea I Laestadius1, Megan M Wahl2, Pallav Pokhrel3, Young I Cho2. 1. Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 1240 N 10th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53205, USA. Electronic address: llaestad@uwm.edu. 2. Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 1240 N 10th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53205, USA. 3. Cancer Prevention in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 701 Ilalo St., Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: With the growing popularity of refillable e-cigarettes and recent FDA regulatory action on e-liquid warning labels, e-liquids are an increasingly important area of study. At present, however, little is known about how e-liquids are marketed. This study examined e-liquid marketing on the visual social media platform Instagram, on which users have created significant amounts of e-cigarette related content. METHODS: A systematic, random sample of Instagram posts with either #eliquid or #ejuice was collected from the Instagram API during one week in May 2017 and in October 2017 using the Netlytic application. A final sample of 1000 posts was analyzed using qualitative content analysis to discern e-liquid themes, claims, promotions, and products promoted. RESULTS: Of the 1000 posts, 61.1% promoted e-liquid. These posts were most frequently made by vape shops and ambassadors/representatives. Almost 80% of promotional posts featured a flavored e-liquid. Posts focused largely on e-liquids tasting good (35.4%) or being cool/edgy (19.0%). Many posts made use of Instagram's visual nature to share creative label designs. Just over a third of posts made some claim about e-liquid benefits or quality, with smokeless tobacco claims being most common. Although posts most commonly originated from the United States, posts made from Indonesia and the United Kingdom were also common. CONCLUSIONS: E-liquid marketing on Instagram emphasizes positive experiences, personalization, and aspirational identities rather than explicit health and cessation claims. Appeal to youth is a significant concern based both on marketing strategies and the demographics of Instagram users.
INTRODUCTION: With the growing popularity of refillable e-cigarettes and recent FDA regulatory action on e-liquid warning labels, e-liquids are an increasingly important area of study. At present, however, little is known about how e-liquids are marketed. This study examined e-liquid marketing on the visual social media platform Instagram, on which users have created significant amounts of e-cigarette related content. METHODS: A systematic, random sample of Instagram posts with either #eliquid or #ejuice was collected from the Instagram API during one week in May 2017 and in October 2017 using the Netlytic application. A final sample of 1000 posts was analyzed using qualitative content analysis to discern e-liquid themes, claims, promotions, and products promoted. RESULTS: Of the 1000 posts, 61.1% promoted e-liquid. These posts were most frequently made by vape shops and ambassadors/representatives. Almost 80% of promotional posts featured a flavored e-liquid. Posts focused largely on e-liquids tasting good (35.4%) or being cool/edgy (19.0%). Many posts made use of Instagram's visual nature to share creative label designs. Just over a third of posts made some claim about e-liquid benefits or quality, with smokeless tobacco claims being most common. Although posts most commonly originated from the United States, posts made from Indonesia and the United Kingdom were also common. CONCLUSIONS:E-liquid marketing on Instagram emphasizes positive experiences, personalization, and aspirational identities rather than explicit health and cessation claims. Appeal to youth is a significant concern based both on marketing strategies and the demographics of Instagram users.
Authors: Grace Kong; Meghan E Morean; Dana A Cavallo; Deepa R Camenga; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Pallav Pokhrel; Thaddeus A Herzog; Pebbles Fagan; Jennifer B Unger; Alan W Stacy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Bridget K Ambrose; Hannah R Day; Brian Rostron; Kevin P Conway; Nicolette Borek; Andrew Hyland; Andrea C Villanti Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Caitlin Notley; Sarah Gentry; Sharon Cox; Martin Dockrell; Michelle Havill; Angela S Attwood; Matthew Smith; Marcus R Munafò Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 7.256
Authors: Pallav Pokhrel; Pebbles Fagan; Crissy T Kawamoto; Scott K Okamoto; Thaddeus A Herzog Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 4.852