Caroline Chen1, Yue-Lin Zhuang1, Shu-Hong Zhu2. 1. Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California. 2. Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California. Electronic address: szhu@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) designs may be described as "closed" or "open." Closed systems are disposable or reloadable with prefilled cartridges (cigalikes). Open systems feature a prominent chamber (tank), refillable with e-liquid. This study examined user design preference and its association with smoking cessation. METHODS: A probability sample of current e-cigarette users (n=923) among adult ever smokers (n=6,560) in the U.S. was surveyed online between February 28 and March 31, 2014, and analyzed in September 2014. Photos of e-cigarette devices were presented alongside survey questions to facilitate respondents' understanding of the questions. RESULTS: Most e-cigarette users were exclusive users of one design: 51.4% used only closed systems and 41.1% used only open systems, with 7.4% using both. Former smokers were more likely to use open systems than current smokers (53.8% vs 35.2%, p=0.002). Current smokers who attempted to quit in the last 12 months were more likely to use open systems than those who did not (41.4% vs 27.7%, p=0.029). Open system users were more likely than closed system users to use e-cigarettes daily (50.2% vs 22.9%, p<0.0001). Open system users were less likely to report their devices resembled (3.1% vs 73.0%, p<0.0001) or tasted like (29.1% vs 53.3%, p<0.0001) a cigarette but were more likely to report that their devices satisfied cravings than closed system users (82.8% vs 67.2%, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preference of e-cigarette design is associated with smoking cessation. A device's ability to deliver more nicotine and its flexibility in use might contribute to users' success in quitting smoking.
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) designs may be described as "closed" or "open." Closed systems are disposable or reloadable with prefilled cartridges (cigalikes). Open systems feature a prominent chamber (tank), refillable with e-liquid. This study examined user design preference and its association with smoking cessation. METHODS: A probability sample of current e-cigarette users (n=923) among adult ever smokers (n=6,560) in the U.S. was surveyed online between February 28 and March 31, 2014, and analyzed in September 2014. Photos of e-cigarette devices were presented alongside survey questions to facilitate respondents' understanding of the questions. RESULTS: Most e-cigarette users were exclusive users of one design: 51.4% used only closed systems and 41.1% used only open systems, with 7.4% using both. Former smokers were more likely to use open systems than current smokers (53.8% vs 35.2%, p=0.002). Current smokers who attempted to quit in the last 12 months were more likely to use open systems than those who did not (41.4% vs 27.7%, p=0.029). Open system users were more likely than closed system users to use e-cigarettes daily (50.2% vs 22.9%, p<0.0001). Open system users were less likely to report their devices resembled (3.1% vs 73.0%, p<0.0001) or tasted like (29.1% vs 53.3%, p<0.0001) a cigarette but were more likely to report that their devices satisfied cravings than closed system users (82.8% vs 67.2%, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preference of e-cigarette design is associated with smoking cessation. A device's ability to deliver more nicotine and its flexibility in use might contribute to users' success in quitting smoking.
Authors: William V Lechner; Ellen Meier; Josh L Wiener; DeMond M Grant; Jenna Gilmore; Matt R Judah; Adam C Mills; Theodore L Wagener Journal: Addiction Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Soha Talih; Zainab Balhas; Thomas Eissenberg; Rola Salman; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Ahmad El Hellani; Rima Baalbaki; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Giorgio Romagna; Dimitris Tsiapras; Stamatis Kyrzopoulos; Vassilis Voudris Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: René A Arrazola; Tushar Singh; Catherine G Corey; Corinne G Husten; Linda J Neff; Benjamin J Apelberg; Rebecca E Bunnell; Conrad J Choiniere; Brian A King; Shanna Cox; Tim McAfee; Ralph S Caraballo Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Shu-Hong Zhu; Jessica Y Sun; Erika Bonnevie; Sharon E Cummins; Anthony Gamst; Lu Yin; Madeleine Lee Journal: Tob Control Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Carla J Berg; Dianne C Barker; Steve Sussman; Betelihem Getachew; Kim Pulvers; Theodore L Wagener; Rashelle B Hayes; Lisa Henriksen Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jennifer L Pearson; Sara C Hitchman; Leonie S Brose; Linda Bauld; Allison M Glasser; Andrea C Villanti; Ann McNeill; David B Abrams; Joanna E Cohen Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Jenny E Ozga-Hess; Nicholas J Felicione; Stuart G Ferguson; Geri Dino; Daniel Elswick; Catherine Whitworth; Nicholas Turiano; Melissa D Blank Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Laura A Gibson; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher; Melissa B Harrell; Grace Kong; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Adam M Leventhal; Alexandra Loukas; Rob McConnell; Scott R Weaver Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Karen O Brandon; Vani N Simmons; Lauren R Meltzer; David J Drobes; Úrsula Martínez; Steven K Sutton; Amanda M Palmer; Christopher R Bullen; Paul T Harrell; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Carla J Berg; Dianne C Barker; Christina Meyers; Amber Weber; Amy J Park; Akilah Patterson; Sarah Dorvil; Robert T Fairman; Jidong Huang; Steve Sussman; Melvin D Livingston; Theodore L Wagener; Rashelle B Hayes; Kim Pulvers; Betelihem Getachew; Nina Schleicher; Lisa Henriksen Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.244