Elisa M Trucco1,2, Nilofar Fallah-Sohy1, Sarah A Hartmann1, Julie V Cristello1. 1. Florida International University, Psychology Department, Center for Children and Families 11200 SW 8 Street, AHC-1, Miami, FL 33199. 2. University of Michigan, Psychiatry Department, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses prevalence rates of electronic (e-)cigarette use among youth and factors that likely contribute to their growing popularity among this population. Trends shaping the e-cigarette landscape, the appeal of e-cigarettes among youth, perceptions contributing to the initiation of e-cigarettes, available assessments capturing the usage of and attitudes towards e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette policies and regulations are reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: E-cigarette use among this vulnerable group may relate to factors associated with the promotion of social status, individuality, and enjoyment, along with low perceptions of risk and harm. Measures assessing factors unique to e-cigarette use among youth (e.g., individuality) still need to be developed and validated. Effects of existing regulations to limit youth access to e-cigarettes may be limited, and shortcomings of current policy measures are discussed with recommendations. SUMMARY: The rise of e-cigarette use among youth culminated through a perfect storm of clever marketing targeting youth appeal, innovations in more effective nicotine delivery systems, capitalizing on increased susceptibility of the adolescent brain, and regulatory gaps. Understanding risk and protective factors specific to this vulnerable group, which can be gleaned in part by psychometrically valid assessments, could inform regulatory strategies and prevention programming efforts. Yet, few validated measures exist that assess attitudes, behaviors, and patterns of e-cigarette use that are specific to youth. Ultimately, it is incumbent upon policymakers to create comprehensive regulations that prioritize harm reduction and can evolve in lockstep with the constantly changing e-cigarette product landscape.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses prevalence rates of electronic (e-)cigarette use among youth and factors that likely contribute to their growing popularity among this population. Trends shaping the e-cigarette landscape, the appeal of e-cigarettes among youth, perceptions contributing to the initiation of e-cigarettes, available assessments capturing the usage of and attitudes towards e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette policies and regulations are reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: E-cigarette use among this vulnerable group may relate to factors associated with the promotion of social status, individuality, and enjoyment, along with low perceptions of risk and harm. Measures assessing factors unique to e-cigarette use among youth (e.g., individuality) still need to be developed and validated. Effects of existing regulations to limit youth access to e-cigarettes may be limited, and shortcomings of current policy measures are discussed with recommendations. SUMMARY: The rise of e-cigarette use among youth culminated through a perfect storm of clever marketing targeting youth appeal, innovations in more effective nicotine delivery systems, capitalizing on increased susceptibility of the adolescent brain, and regulatory gaps. Understanding risk and protective factors specific to this vulnerable group, which can be gleaned in part by psychometrically valid assessments, could inform regulatory strategies and prevention programming efforts. Yet, few validated measures exist that assess attitudes, behaviors, and patterns of e-cigarette use that are specific to youth. Ultimately, it is incumbent upon policymakers to create comprehensive regulations that prioritize harm reduction and can evolve in lockstep with the constantly changing e-cigarette product landscape.
Authors: Scott R Weaver; Hyoshin Kim; Allison M Glasser; Erin L Sutfin; Jessica Barrington-Trimis; Thomas J Payne; Megan Saddleson; Alexandra Loukas Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Meghan E Morean; Ellyn R Butler; Krysten W Bold; Grace Kong; Deepa R Camenga; Dana A Cavallo; Patricia Simon; Stephanie S O'Malley; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jacob A Rohde; Seth M Noar; Casey Horvitz; Allison J Lazard; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cria G Perrine; Cassandra M Pickens; Tegan K Boehmer; Brian A King; Christopher M Jones; Carla L DeSisto; Lindsey M Duca; Akaki Lekiachvili; Brandon Kenemer; Mays Shamout; Michael G Landen; Ruth Lynfield; Isaac Ghinai; Amy Heinzerling; Nathaniel Lewis; Ian W Pray; Lauren J Tanz; Anita Patel; Peter A Briss Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 17.586