Literature DB >> 30248937

Hanks-Type Serine/Threonine Protein Kinases and Phosphatases in Bacteria: Roles in Signaling and Adaptation to Various Environments.

Monika Janczarek1, José-María Vinardell2, Paulina Lipa3, Magdalena Karaś4.   

Abstract

Reversible phosphorylation is a key mechanism that regulates many cellular processes in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In prokaryotes, signal transduction includes two-component signaling systems, which involve a membrane sensor histidine kinase and a cognate DNA-binding response regulator. Several recent studies indicate that alternative regulatory pathways controlled by Hanks-type serine/threonine kinases (STKs) and serine/threonine phosphatases (STPs) also play an essential role in regulation of many different processes in bacteria, such as growth and cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, sporulation, biofilm formation, stress response, metabolic and developmental processes, as well as interactions (either pathogenic or symbiotic) with higher host organisms. Since these enzymes are not DNA-binding proteins, they exert the regulatory role via post-translational modifications of their protein targets. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of STKs and STPs, and discuss how these enzymes mediate gene expression in prokaryotes. Many studies indicate that regulatory systems based on Hanks-type STKs and STPs play an essential role in the regulation of various cellular processes, by reversibly phosphorylating many protein targets, among them several regulatory proteins of other signaling cascades. These data show high complexity of bacterial regulatory network, in which the crosstalk between STK/STP signaling enzymes, components of TCSs, and the translational machinery occurs. In this regulation, the STK/STP systems have been proved to play important roles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial gene expression; regulatory network; reversible protein phosphorylation; serine/threonine protein kinase; serine/threonine protein phosphatase; signal transduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30248937      PMCID: PMC6213207          DOI: 10.3390/ijms19102872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


1. Introduction

How bacteria sense and respond to the environment is a fundamental question of bacterial physiology. The survival of microorganisms in the environment depends on their capacity to quickly respond to and adapt to constantly changing conditions. Bacteria occupy different ecological niches. Many bacteria are able to either exist in a free-living stage or interact with the host organism (e.g., pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria) [1,2]. This adaptive potential is ensured by the ability of bacterial cells to sense and transduce both external and internal signals. Protein kinases and their cognate phosphatases, which participate in signal transduction by catalyzing reversible protein phosphorylation, play essential roles in sensing of the external stimuli [3,4]. Phosphorylation is probably the most prevalent and best characterized post-translational modification, and its biological functions are well documented. It is now clear that this modification is widespread in all three domains of life, Eukarya, Bacteria, and Archaea [5,6]. Similarly to eukaryotes, highly diverse enzymatic families with this type of activity (kinases/phosphatases) have been found in bacteria. These enzymes phosphorylate and dephosphorylate various amino acid residues in proteins, most commonly serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), tyrosine (Tyr), histidine (His), and arginine (Arg) [3,7]. Phosphorylation of these specific amino acids in proteins is an essential component of many signal transduction pathways. In such pathways, in addition to protein kinases and phosphatases, phosphoproteins that “sense” other regulatory proteins play an essential role [8,9]. Thus, phosphorylation can control the activity of target proteins, either directly, by inducing conformational changes in proteins, or indirectly, by regulating protein-protein interactions. In bacteria, this large number of protein kinases has been classified into five types. These include: His kinases, Tyr kinases, Arg kinases, Hanks-type Ser/Thr kinases (STKs) (also commonly named eukaryotic-like STKs), and atypical Ser kinases [3]. Recently, Nguyen and others [10] have proposed a new family of protein kinases with a Ser/Thr/Tyr kinase activity, that was previously identified as a family of ATPases. A prototypic member of this family, YdiB from Bacillus subtilis, has a unique ATP-binding fold, not found in the known protein kinases. In general, while all types of kinases are widespread in bacteria, some are restricted to only some species (atypical Ser kinases). His kinases and atypical Ser kinases are involved in the regulation of gene expression and the control of metabolism, respectively, whereas Tyr kinases and Hanks-type STKs regulate several aspects of bacterial physiology. Unlike Eukarya, most tyrosine phosphorylation in bacteria is conducted not by Hanks-type kinases, but by non-Hanks-type kinases, which are responsible for most of the tyrosine kinase activity [3,5,7]. Bacterial two-component systems (TCSs), in which a membrane sensor His kinase activates a transcription factor-response regulator in response to a specific signal, play a dominant role in bacterial signaling. However, recent studies have shown that signaling systems composed of STKs and Ser/Thr phosphatases (STPs) also play an important role in bacterial regulatory networks. Even though these systems do not have dedicated transcription factors, they are capable of affecting gene expression [11,12,13]. Recent phosphoproteomic analyses identified numerous (ca. 100) proteins phosphorylated on Ser or Thr residues in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as in Archaea, indicating that regulation based on STK/STP enzymes is common in these microorganisms [14,15,16,17]. In t<span class="Chemical">his review, we focused on the recent findings about STKs, which share structural and functional homology with eukaryotic STKs, and their partner <span class="Gene">STPs, which play an important role in balancing protein kinase functions. We here discuss their roles in bacterial signaling and physiology (protein phosphorylation and its role in signal transduction in Archaea have been recently reviewed in References [16,17]). To date, essentially more data are available on STKs than on STPs, indicating that partners of these kinases have not yet been analyzed in detail and additional studies must be performed for a comprehensive overview of the role of these proteins in bacterial regulatory networks.

2. Structure and Mechanism of Action of Bacterial STKs and STPs

2.1. Structure and Mechanism of Action of Bacterial STKs

In 1988, Hanks et al. [18] defined and described the main family of Ser/Thr/Tyr protein kinases present in eukaryotes. It was initially believed that kinases of this type do not exist in bacteria. However, in 1991, Munoz-Dorato and others characterized the first bacterial STK, Pkn1 from Myxococcus xanthus [19]. This enzyme shares a structural similarity with eukaryotic STKs and is required for normal development of M. xanthus. Since then, numerous studies have indicated that many bacterial species contain protein kinases that share structural similarities with STKs (Table 1). Consequently, these enzymes have long been referred to as “eukaryotic-like” kinases, despite the lack of evidence that they have been acquired by horizontal transfer of eukaryotic genes. Recently, comprehensive phylostratigraphic analyses of Stancik and coworkers [20] suggested that Hanks-type kinases present in Eukarya, Bacteria, and Archaea share a common evolutionary origin in the lineage leading to the last universal common ancestor (LUCA). Moreover, the authors did not find any evidence of horizontal transfer of genes coding for Hanks-type kinases from Eukarya to Bacteria, strongly supporting a monophyletic origin of all Hanks-type kinases. Consequently, these authors proposed to adopt the term “Hanks-type kinases” as a universal name for this enzymatic family [18,20].
Table 1

Serine/threonine kinases (STKs) of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, their substrates, and biological functions.

SpeciesSTKSubstrateFunctionReference
PknAFadD, FabH, KasA, KasB, MabAMycolic acid synthesis[21,22]
Mycobacterium GlmUCell wall synthesis[23]
tuberculosis FtsZ, MurD, Wag31Cell division [24,25,26,27]
PknBSTK, cell signaling[27]
EmbRArabinan synthesis[28]
GroEL1Heat shock protein[29]
PknBFadD, KasA, KasB, MabA Mycolic acid synthesis[21]
EmbRArabinan synthesis[28]
GroEL1Heat shock protein[29]
GlmU, PBPACell wall synthesis[23,30]
PknASTK, cell signaling[27]
RshA Anti-sigma factor, oxidative stress response[31]
SigHAlternative sigma factor, oxidative stress response[31]
GarAGlycogen recycling, TCA cycle[32]
PknDFadD, FabH, KasA, KasB, MabA Mycolic acid synthesis[21,22,33]
GarAGlycogen recycling, TCA cycle[32]
GroEL1Heat shock protein[29]
Mmp17Membrane transporter[34]
Rv0516cAnti-anti-sigma factor[35]
Rv1747ABC transporter[36]
PknEFadD, KasA, KasB, FabH, MabAMycolic acid synthesis[21,22,33]
GarAGlycogen recycling, TCA cycle[32]
GroEL1Heat shock protein[29]
Rv1747ABC transporter[36]
PknFFadD, KasA, KasB, FabH Mycolic acid synthesis[21,22,37]
GroEL1Heat shock protein[29]
GarAGlycogen recycling, TCA cycle[32]
EthRAntibiotic resistance[38]
Rv1747ABC transporter[37]
PknGGarAGlycogen recycling, TCA cycle, virulence[39]
PknHFadD, FabH, KasA, KasBMycolic acid synthesis[21,22,33]
GroEL1Heat shock protein[29]
Rv0681 TetR family transcription factor[40]
EmbRArabinan synthesis, cell wall biosynthesis, virulence[41]
DosRTCS response regulator, oxidative stress tolerance, spore dormancy[42]
DacB1Penicillin-binding protein [40]
GarAGlycogen recycling, TCA cycle[39]
PknIFadDMycolic acid synthesis[21]
PknJEmbRArabinan synthesis, cell wall biosynthesis[41]
PepEPeptidase[43]
Mma4Mycolic acid synthesis[43]
PknKFadDMycolic acid synthesis[21]
VirSTranscription factor, stress response[44]
PknLFadD, MabA, KasA, KasBMycolic acid synthesis[21,22]
Rv2175cDNA-binding protein, cell envelope[45]
GroEL1Heat shock protein[29]
Bacillus subtilis PrkANDIndirect regulation of transcription factor δK and regulator ScoC, sporulation[46]
PrkCCpgAGTPase, peptydoglycan decomposition, late state of ribosome assembly[47]
AlsDΑ-acetolactase, central metabolism[48]
IcdCentral metabolism[48]
YvcK GpsBSporulation process, cell growthCell division protein, sporulation[49][49]
YwjHTransladolase, central metabolism[48]
GlnAGlutamine synthetase, central metabolism[48]
HprPhosphotransferase system kinase[48]
WalRResponse regulator of TCS WalRK, cell wall metabolism in stationary phase[11]
AbrATranscriptional regulator, exoprotease production, competence development and sporulation[50]
AbrBGlobal transcriptional regulator, transition from exponential to stationary growth phase[50]
YkwCOxidoreductase[51]
EF-G, EF-TuElongation factors, protein translation, spore germination and cell growth [47,49,52,53]
PrkD (YbdM)AbrATranscriptional regulator, exoprotease production, competence development [50]
AbrB Global transcriptional regulator, transition from exponential to stationary growth phase[49]
DnaCHelicase, DNA replication, cell growth[49]
YabTSsbADNA recombinase, spore development[54]
RacADNA-related protein, DNA anchoring to the cell pole, sporulation[49]
RecADNA recombinase, DNA damage repair, sporulation [49]
AbrBGlobal transcriptional regulator, transition from exponential to stationary growth phase[49]
AbrATranscriptional regulator, exoprotease production, competence development and sporulation[49]
EF-G, EF-TuElongation factors, inhibition of protein translation in spores[55,56]
YdiB (Ser/Thr/Tyr)YdiETranslation, oxidative stress response[10]
MBP *Human myelin basic protein (artificial substrate)[10]
Bacillus anthracis PrkC (BA-Stk1)NDMBP *Survival within macrophages, virulenceHuman myelin basic protein (artificial substrate)[57][57]
PrkDBasPykPyruvate kinase phosphorylation, glycolysis, cell growth and development[58]
MBP *Human myelin basic protein (artificial substrate)[58]
PrkGMBP *Human myelin basic protein (artificial substrate) STK PrkG involved in cell growth and development[58]
Corynebacterium PknAMurCCell wall biosynthesis[59]
glutamicum FtsZCell division[60]
OdhIGlutamate catabolism[60,61]
PknGSoluble STK[61]
PknBFtsZCell division[60]
OdhIGlutamate catabolism[60,61]
PknGOdhIGlutamate catabolism[60,61]
PknLFtsZCell division[60]
Streptococcus Stk1DivIVACell division[62]
agalactiae CovRTCS CovRS response regulator, toxin expression, virulence[63,64]
(Group B EF-TuElongation factor[63,64,65]
Streptococcus) PpaCInorganic pyrophosphatase, virulence[65]
NDATP-dependent DNA i RNA helicases[66]
Streptococcus pyogenes SP-STKWalRCovRTCS WalRK response regulator, cell wall TCS CovRS response regulator, virulence[67][67]
(Group A Streptococcus) SP-HLP, HUHistone-like protein[67]
Streptococcus StkPFtsZ Cell division, cellular morphogenesis[68]
pneumoniae DivIVACell division, cellular morphogenesis[69]
PpaCInorganic pyrophosphatase, virulence[68]
RitRTranscriptional regulator, iron uptake, oxidative stress response[70]
MurCCell wall biosynthesis[71]
ComDCompetence-specific receptor, TCS ComDE [72]
RR06Adhesion, virulence[73]
RpoARNA polymerase α subunit[74]
Streptococcus mutans PknBNDNDCell wall metabolism, bacteriocin production, cell wall metabolism, growth, biofilm formationRegulation of Smu2146c, TCSs VicRK and ComDE, oxidative stress tolerance[75]
Staphylococcus Stk1SA0498Ribosomal protein L7/L12[76]
aureus (PknB)SA0545Phosphate acetyltransferase[76]
(secreted) SA0731Enolase[76]
SA1359Elongation factor P[76]
SA2340Glyoxalase[76]
SA2399 Fructose biphosphate aldolase[76]
MgrAGlobal transcriptional regulator, antibiotic resistance[77]
SarAGlobal transcriptional regulator, virulence[78]
SarZOxidative stress response[79]
PurAPurine biosynthesis[77,78]
HUDNA-binding histone-like protein[77,78]
CcpACatabolite control protein A, carbon metabolism, virulence[80]
VraRVancomycin-resistance-associated response regulator[81]
GraRTCS GraSR response regulator, antibiotic resistance[82]
SpoVGTranscriptional factor, virulence, antibiotic resistance [83]
Staphylococcus epidermidis StkNDPolysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) production, biofilm formation, virulence[84]
Mycoplasma pneumoniae PrkCNDSurface protein (adhesin P1), HmW1-3, and MPN474 phosphorylation, adhesion[85]
Mycoplasma genitalium MG_109NDVirulence[86]
Enterococcus faecium StkP5APCell signaling, antibiotic resistance, peptydoglycan biosynthesis[87,88]
Myxococcus Pkn2HUHistone-like protein [89]
xanthus Pkn4PFKGlycolysis[90]
Pkn5NDSoluble STK, cell growth and development, formation of fruiting bodies [91]
Pkn6NDTransmembrane STK, cell growth and development, formation of fruiting bodies [91]
Pkn8Pkn14Soluble STK[92]
MrpCTranscription factor, development of fruiting bodies [92]
Pkn14MrpCTranscription factor, development of fruiting bodies [92]
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803SpkANDPilA1, A2, A5, A6, A9, A10 expression, cell motility[93,94]
MBP *, casein *, histone *Artificial substrates[93,94]
SpkBGlySGlycyl-tRNA synthetase β-subunit, oxidative stress adaptation[95]
SpkCSpkKSoluble STK, stress response[96]
SpkDNDCarbon metabolism, TCA cycle regulation, bacterial growth[97]
SpkENDCell signaling[98]
SpkFSpkCMembrane-associated STK, stress response[96]
SpkGNDHigh salt resistance, stress-mediated signaling[99]
SpkKGroESSmall co-chaperonin[96]
Anabaena sp.PknANDOptimal growth[100]
PknCNDOptimal growth[100]
PknDNDOptimal growth, heterocyst functioning, nitrogen fixation[101,102,103]
PCC 7120PknENDOptimal diazotrophic growth, heterocyst differentiation, nitrogen fixation[101,102,103]
PknHNDDiazotrophic growth, maintaining connections between heterocysts and vegetative cells[104]
L. PrkAPolCDNA Polymerase III α subunit[105]
monocytogenes RpoARNA polymerase α subunit[105]
RpoBRNA polymerase β subunit[105]
RecARecombinant protein[105]
EF-Tu, EF-GTranslation elongation factors[105]
YvckCell wall homeostasis, glycerol metabolism, cytosolic survival, virulence[106]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PpkAFha1FHA domain-containing protein, hemolysin-coregulated protein 1 (Hcp1) secretion, biofilm formation, virulence, stress tolerance [107]
H1 *Eukaryotic histone H1[108]
Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YpkA (secreted)NDVirulence factor activated by host cell actin, cytoskeleton disruption, inhibition of macrophage function[109]
E. coli (EHEC)StkNDVirulence[110]
Rhizobium leguminosarum BAE36_06965 BAE36_16215 BAE36_31125NDOptimal cell growth, oxidative stress adaptation[111]

ND, not determined; * artificial (in vitro model) kinase substrates; TCA cycle—tricarboxylic acid cycle; ABC transporter—ATP-binding cassette transporter; TCS—two-component system.

Hanks-type serine/threonine kinases (STKs) are either membrane or cytoplasmic proteins containing a catalytic domain with 12 specific signatures defined by Hanks. Moreover, STKs possess additional subdomains, which are responsible for the regulation of STK activity or influence their subcellular localization. These kinases can be autophosphorylated. The kinase domains of STKs are typically organized into 12 subdomains that fold into a characteristic two-lobed catalytic core structure with the active site located in a deep cleft formed between the two lobes (Figure 1) [112,113,114]. The N-terminal lobe is involved in the binding and orienting of an ATP molecule (phosphate donor), whereas the C-terminal lobe is responsible for binding to the protein substrate and transfer of the phosphate group. The structural conservation of the catalytic domain in different kinases is remarkable and maintained across eukaryotic and bacterial domains. Despite little sequence homology between members of the superfamily, the kinase catalytic domain can be defined by the presence of specific conserved motifs and 12 nearly invariant residues participating in positioning of the ATP molecule and protein substrate for catalysis [7,112,114]. The activation segment is the most important regulatory element of the kinase. It includes several conserved loop motifs: catalytic, Mg2+-binding, activation and P+1 loops (Figure 1). The STK activation occurs by phosphorylation of at least one Ser/Thr residue in the activation loop, and this is achieved by either autophosphorylation or transphosphorylation by another kinase. The activation loop is the most variable region of the activation segment, determines substrate specificity, and is a site of protein-protein interactions that modulate kinase activity. The P+1 loop, which is a critical point of contact between the kinase and its substrate, is a major determinant of the distinct substrate specificity of Ser/Thr and Tyr kinases. In the former, this loop contains a conserved Ser or Thr residue that interacts with the catalytic loop. A glycine-rich P loop plays an important role in the transfer of the phosphoryl group and exchange of ATP/ADP during the catalytic cycle [7]. All these conformational changes allow the transfer of a γ-phosphate group from ATP to the Ser or Thr residue in the protein substrate. The first described structure of bacterial STK was that of Mycobacterium tuberculosis PknB (Figure 1) [115,116,117]. The structure of this protein was found to be very similar to that of the mouse cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). The catalytic domain of PknB exhibits the typical two-lobed structure. Structure similarities between these proteins suggest a common activation mechanism shared by eukaryotic and prokaryotic STKs. PknB was crystalized as a dimer, indicating interactions between the opposite sides of the N-terminal lobes of two catalytic domains. The obtained results support a similar model of activation for bacterial STKs. The importance of dimerization in kinase activation was further documented by mutagenesis studies, in which the replacement of conserved amino acid (aa) residues in the N-terminal lobe reduced autophosphorylation and altered substrate specificity [7,118,119]. However, the mechanism by which dimerization results in autophosphorylation remains unknown. One of the proposed hypotheses concerns the formation of asymmetric dimers. As shown for M. tuberculosis PknB, dimerization resulting in front-to-front asymmetric dimers enables subunit interactions, in which one monomer functions as an activator of the second monomer (a substrate), thus mimicking a trans-autophosphorylation complex [120].
Figure 1

Structure of the catalytic domain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis STK PknB. (a) Crystal structure of the PknB catalytic domain with an ATP molecule (Protein Data Bank (PDB) accession number 1MRU) [117]. N-terminal and C-terminal lobes as well as individual loops are indicated. α-Helices are shown in pink, β-sheets are in yellow, ATP molecule is shown in red and grey, and Mg2+ ions are shown as green spheres. (b) Primary amino acid sequence of the 286-residue catalytic domain of PknB. The amino acids (aa) of the N-terminal lobe are blue and aa of the C-terminal lobe are black. Conserved motifs are marked with square brackets, invariant residues are denoted by asterisks, and the phosphorylated Tyr residues in the activation and P+1 loops are shaded in blue.

Apart from the catalytic domain, many bacterial STKs contain, additional domain(s) that mediate the binding of ligands and/or protein-protein interactions [e.g., penicillin-binding and Ser/Thr kinase-associated repeats (PASTA) and forkhead-associated domains responsible for recognizing phosphothreonine epitopes on proteins (FHA)] [114]. It has been found that the variability in this modular organization of STKs is characteristic of bacteria that have a few different STKs, such as Myxobacterium, Streptomyces coelicolor, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Among membrane STKs, one class of these enzymes (PASTA-STKs) possesses the extracellular PASTA domain, which is not found in Eukaryotes. Gram-positive bacteria possess at least one STK located in the membrane, which is composed of a cytoplasmic catalytic domain linked by a transmembrane segment to an extracellular domain containing a variable number of PASTA motifs. Importantly, membrane STKs with PASTA motifs play a major role in the regulation of bacterial cell division and morphogenesis. These motifs interact with the peptidoglycan and serve as a regulatory domain of STK kinase activity [7,121,122,123,124]. The PASTA domains were characterized for the first time by crystal structure analyses in the PBP2X protein from S. pneumoniae. In this protein, two PASTA repeats with a unique β3α topology were found [124]. In the case of M. tuberculosis, the extracellular sensor domain of the transmembrane kinase PknD forms a propeller-like circle structure composed of six β-sheet motifs symmetrically arranged around a central pore [125], whereas the kinase PknB contains an extracellular domain that is composed of four linearly organized PASTA repeats [126]. PknB from Staphylococcus aureus shows a similar linear organization of its sensor extracellular domain, which contains three PASTA repeats [127]. As has been shown for B. subtilis PrkC, the PASTA motifs can interact with the peptidoglycan, a ligand of the STK receptor site [128]. The presence of a ligand has also been found to play a role in the dimerization of these enzymes, as it was reported for PknB from M. tuberculosis and PknB from S. aureus: in these STKs, binding of peptidoglycan to the PASTA repeats induces dimerization of two kinase molecules, resulting in STK activation [7,126,128]. Thus, PASTA-STKs would behave as membrane receptors able to signal information about the status of the cell wall to their endogenous phosphorylation targets. Several genetic studies indicate that generally genes encoding the PASTA-STKs are located next to and co-transcribed with genes coding for their cognate STPs (e.g., for PknB/PstP of M. tuberculosis, PknB/PppL of S. mutans, PrkC/PrpC of B. subtilis, Stk1/Stp1 of S. aureus, Stk1/Stp1 of B. anthracis, Stk1/Stp1 of S. agalactie, and SP-STK/SP-STP of S. pyogenes) (Table 1) [47,52,65,67]. Based on both genomic and proteomic studies, it has been established that various bacterial species harbor more than one STK and, frequently, the number of STKs reflects the complexity of the environments inhabited by these bacterial species [7,20]. Interestingly, mycobacteria have an unusually large repertoire of this type of kinases. For example, 11 STKs have been identified in M. tuberculosis; these proteins are involved in various cellular processes, such as growth, development, biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, primary and secondary metabolism, stress responses, and virulence (Table 1) [129,130,131,132,133]. Further, multiple STKs have been identified and characterized in other microorganisms (e.g., Anabaena sp., Synechocystis sp., and M. xanthus). Using different methods (in vitro kinase assay, mass spectrometry, site-directed mutagenesis, 2D electrophoresis, and phospho-amino acid analysis), target proteins for several individual STKs have been determined (Table 1). Consequently, a large range of substrate-specificity has been described for these kinases, including other STKs. This indicates a high complexity of bacterial regulatory networks, in which these STKs appear to play a major role. Interestingly, the great majority of STKs discovered to date are from Gram-positive bacteria, and only a few have been thus far identified in Gram-negative bacteria. In fact, it had been postulated that some bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, do not possess STK orthologs. However, recently, Li and others [110] have discovered a putative STK, Stk, that acts as an effector in a strain of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). This previously unknown effector, which upon translocation to the infected mouse cells efficiently phosphorylates IκBα and activates the NF-κB pathway, induces aggressive host inflammatory response during EHEC infection. In addition, other STK orthologs have also been identified recently in other pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PpkA) and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (YpkA) [107,109]. Interestingly, according to genomic analyses, STK orthologs can also be found in non-pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, e.g., soil bacteria that establish symbiotic interactions with legumes (rhizobia). For instance, three genes encoding putative STKs have been identified in the genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum Rt24.2, although protein substrates for these putative STKs are still unknown [111]. To summarize, the available data indicate that Gram-positive bacteria possess a higher variety of STKs than Gram-negative bacteria. Among them, <span class="Species">M. tuberculosis has the highest number of enzymes of t<span class="Chemical">his type determined thus far (Table 1).

2.2. Structure and Function of Bacterial STPs

The bacterial ability to sense and respond to the changing environmental conditions requires continuous and reversible phosphorylation. Apart from STKs, cognate STPs are engaged in this process [7,13]. However, up to now, less bacterial STPs have been discovered and biochemically characterized than STKs (Table 2). This may be because (i) enzymes of this type have not been of great interest to researchers to date and (ii) the number of STPs present in bacterial cells is considerably smaller than that of STKs. Even in Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria, which have been intensely studied for many years, only a few STPs have been identified so far, independently of the type of ecological niche that they inhabit [134]. Further, in the case of Gram-negative bacteria, only a few examples of these enzymes have been described, and data are especially scarce for the soil bacteria (Table 2). As commented above, this may be partially explained by the fact that, for a long time, proteins with these activities were not of scientific interest since, similarly to TCSs and phosphorelay signal transduction (where both phosphohistidine (His-P) and aspartyl-phosphate groups undergo relatively rapid hydrolysis), they were considered to not be necessary for dephosphorylation of Ser-P- and Thr-P-phosphorylated regulatory proteins. However, phosphorylated Thr and Ser residues are not as labile as His-P, and, therefore, cognate phosphatases are needed to quench the signaling cascades involving cognate STKs [7,13,135].
Table 2

Bacterial serine/threonine phosphatases (STPs), their substrates, and biological functions.

SpeciesSTPTypePartner kinaseSubstrateFunctionReferences
Mycobacterium tuberculosis PstPPPMPknBPknASTK, cell signaling, cell growth and division, cell survival[136,137]
PknBSTK, cell signaling, cell growth[137]
PknHSTK, cell signaling, cell growth[136]
PknJSTK, cell signaling, cell growth[138]
PykAPyruvate kinase, glycolysis[138]
EmbRTranscriptional regulator of embCAB operon[136]
NDS-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase, homocysteine metabolism[139]
PapA5Cell wall metabolism[140]
Rv0019cFHA-domain-containing protein interacting with FtsZ, GtsQ, and PapA5, cell division[140]
PBPAPBP, cell wall biosynthesis[30]
Bacillus PrpCPP2CPrkCEF-G, EF-TuTranslation factor[47,52]
subtilis PrkCSTK, cell signaling, biofilm formation, sporulation[47,52]
CpGRibosome-associated GTPase[47]
YezBStress response[47]
HPr kinasePhosphotransferase system[141]
RsbXPPMRsbBRsbS, TsbRSigma B regulation, stress response[142]
RsbUPPMRsbVRsbVSigma B regulation, stress response[142]
RsbPPPM RsbVEnergy stress response [142]
SpoIIEPPM SpoIIAAAnti-anti-sigma factor, sporulation[143]
Bacillus anthracis PrpC (BA-Stp1)PP2CBA-Stk1PrkC (BA-Stk1)STK, cell signaling, survival within macrophages, virulence[144]
PrkD PrkGDual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinases[58]
Streptococcus Stp1PP2CStk1Stk1STK, cell signaling, cell aggregation[65]
agalactiae P35Mn2+-dependent inorganic pyrophosphatase[65]
(group B PpaCInorganic pyrophosphatase[65]
Streptococcus) PurANDPurine synthesisHemolysin activity, autolysis, virulence[65][65]
Streptococcus PhpPPP2CStkPStkPSTK, cell signaling[74]
pneumoniae RitRTranscriptional regulator[70]
ComDCompetence-specific receptor, TCS ComDE system[72]
MurCPeptydoglycan synthesis[71]
MapZCell division[145]
RR06 TCS response regulator[67,146]
DivIVACell division[147]
Streptococcus SP-STPPP2CSP-STKSP-STKSTK, cell signaling[67,148]
pyogenes (secreted) SP-HLP NDHistone-like proteinInduction of host cell apoptosis[148]
Streptococcus mutans PppLPP2C PknBSTK, cell signaling[149]
Staphylococcus aureus Stp1PP2CStk1Stk1STK, cell signaling, membrane integrity, cell division, cell wall biosynthesis[150,151,152]
GraRTCS response regulator[150,151,152]
MgrAGlobal transcriptional regulator[79]
Myxococcus xanthus Pph1PP2CPkn5Pkn5Negative effector of development, vegetative growth and formation of fruiting bodies [153]
Enterococcus faecium StpAPP2CStkStk P5APSTK, cell signaling, antibiotic resistance, peptydoglycan biosynthesis[85]
MBP *Myelin basic protein (artificial substrate)[85]
Mycoplasma pneumoniae PrpCPP2C HPrPhosphocarrier protein, phosphotransferase system[154]
Mycoplasma synoviae PrpCPP2C NDPhosphopeptides *Cell signalingArtificial substrates[155]
Mycoplasma genitalium MG_207PPMMG_109NDCell signaling, virulence[156]
Listeria StpPP2C EF-TuTranslation factor, protein synthesis regulation[157]
monocytogenes SODSuperoxide dismutase, respiratory metabolism[158]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PppAPP2CPpkAFHA-1FHA-domain-containing protein, hemolysin-coregulated protein 1 (Hcp1) secretion [105]
TpbAPPP TpbBDual-specificity Ser/Thr/Tyr kinase, cell motility, biofilm formation[159]
Stp1PP2C NDProtein synthesis[105,159]
Escherichia coli PrpAPPP NDCasein, MBP *Signaling protein misfolding via TCS CpxRA, heat shock responseDual-specificity Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphatase[160]
Salmonella enterica ser. TyphiPrpZ (Ser/Thr/Tyr)PP2C MBP *Myelin basic protein[161]
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803IcfGPP2C Slr1856Carbon metabolism[162]
PphAPPM PIINitrogen assimilation[163]
Anabaena sp. PCC7120All1758PP2C NDDiazotrophic growth, cell morphology, glycolipid synthesis[164]
Rhizobium leguminosarum PssZPP2C NDCell envelope biogenesis, stress response, motility[165]

ND, not determined; * artificial (in vitro model) phosphatase substrates; TCS—two-component system; FHA-domain—forkhead-associated domain; PBP—penicillin-binding protein.

Up to now, four protein phosphatase superfamilies have been identified in Bacteria and Archaea, including phosphoprotein phosphatases (PPPs), metal-dependent phosphatases (PPMs), and conventional and low-molecular-weight protein Tyr phosphatases [12,16,17,35,166]. Enzymes with the STP activity are members of the two structurally different families, PPPs and PPMs. However, a great majority of identified and biochemically characterized STPs belong to the PPM family. Generally, enzymes of the PPP superfamily dephosphorylate Ser-P and Thr-P of the protein substrates. An example of an enzyme with this activity is PrpA from E. coli [160]. However, some members of this family, as was confirmed by in vitro studies, show dual-specificity, and can remove phosphate groups not only from Ser-P and Thr-P, but also from Tyr-P (e.g., TpbA from P. aeruginosa and PP1-cyano2 from Microcystis aeruginosa) [7,35,159,162,167,168]. Serine/threonine protein phosphatases (STPs) belonging to the PPM family can be either Mg2+- or Mn2+-dependent phosphatases that, although differing in size, share a common conserved catalytic domain consisting of 9–11 signature sequence motifs, in which there are eight conserved aa residues [5,13,16,169,170]. Based on the biochemical properties of bacterial PPM PP2C-type STPs characterized to date, these enzymes preferentially use Mn2+ as the metal ion [171]. The N-terminal catalytic domains of all known PP2C STPs share a common core that spans ca. 300 aa residues [172,173,174]. Comparative sequence analysis of the core region of various PP2C STPs revealed the presence of 11 conserved motifs and eight invariant residues (one aspartate (Asp) in motifs 1 and 2, Thr in motif 4, glycine (Gly) in motifs 5 and 6, Asp and Gly in motif 8, and Asp in motif 11) [175,176]. Some PP2C STPs contain additional motifs, motifs 5a and 5b, located between motifs 5 and 6. Depending on the presence of motifs 5a and 5b, the PP2C STPs are subdivided into two subfamilies [171]. Some examples of enzymes from the first subfamily, which lack these motifs, are IcfG from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, and sporulation-specific phosphatase SpolIE and stress response phosphatases RsbP, RsbU, and RsbX from B. subtilis (Table 2). Enzymes belonging to the second subfamily of PPM PP2C contain all signature motifs and are cognate phosphatases of STKs described above. Interestingly, no inhibitors of these phosphatases have been identified thus far. Usually, a specific STP from the PPM family is dedicated to a particular STK, and these proteins are frequently encoded by genes that belong to the same operon. Interestingly, some discrepancies between the numbers of STKs and STPs in individual bacterial species have been observed; the former are usually more numerous than the latter. The most spectacular example is M. tuberculosis, which contains 11 STKs and only one STP identified to date [12,35,169]. Bacterial STPs from the PPM family share an essential structural similarity with the human PP2C phosphatase, which is involved in cell differentiation, growth, metabolism, and stress response (Figure 2) [13,177]. The catalytic core domain of human PP2C comprises a central β-sandwich formed by the association of two five-stranded anti-parallel β-sheets surrounded by a pair of anti-parallel α-helices on either side. This spatial arrangement generates a cleft, which acts as a metal center for two metal ions (each metal ion is hexacoordinated by conserved aa and water molecules). This constitutes the active site of the enzyme. The phosphatase activity of PP2C enzymes (dephosphorylation) most probably involves a nucleophilic attack of the phosphorous atom by a metal-activated water nucleophile. This mechanism, which is similar in eukaryotes and bacteria, is ensured by the presence of conserved aa in the active site of these enzymes. The main difference between human PP2C and members of the bacterial PP2C family is the lack of 3 α-helices in the latter (helices 7–9), which are most probably involved in substrate specificity and/or regulation of the human PP2C. Up to date, only a few proteins from the bacterial PPM family have been crystallized (e.g., PstP from M. tuberculosis, SaSTP from Streptococcus agalactiae, and PphA from Thermosynechococcus elongatus) [178,179,180]. The obtained data indicate that the catalytic domains of these bacterial enzymes are structurally nearly identical to the catalytic domain of the human PP2C, with the presence of highly conserved aa residues in the active site (Figure 2). However, a few structural differences were found. These include the absence of histidine (His62) in the active site of bacterial enzymes, and the presence of an additional (third) metal ion in the active site and a loop above the active site, which is most probably involved in the regulation of substrate binding and catalysis [7,13,155].
Figure 2

Structure of the catalytic domain of M. tuberculosis STP PstP. (a) Crystal structure of the PstP catalytic domain with Mn2+ ions (PDB accession number 1TXO) [178]. The β-sandwich is represented in yellow, α-helices are represented in pink, and Mn2+ ions are shown as purple spheres. N-terminal and C-terminal lobes and the large irregular loop are indicated. (b) Primary amino acid sequence of the 237-residue catalytic domain of PstP. Conserved amino acids are denoted by asterisks, and those forming a part of the metal-binding pocket are shaded in blue.

3. The Role of STKs and STPs in Bacterial Signaling and Physiology

3.1. Interactions of STKs and STPs with Transcriptional Regulators

Analyses of various mutant strains of bacteria lacking Hanks-type serine/threonine kinase (STK) and/or serine/threonine phosphatase (STP) have facilitated the understanding of how these signaling enzymes contribute to the regulation of gene expression in prokaryotes. STK- and STP-mediated gene expression has been proven to be essential for various cellular processes, such as bacterial growth, cell division and morphology, iron transport, secondary metabolite production, antibiotic resistance, virulence, and interactions with plants (Table 1 and Table 2) (Figure 3) [12,15,16,165,166].
Figure 3

A scheme showing physiological processes regulated by bacterial Hanks-type STKs and STPs in different bacteria.

Although STKs and STPs are not DNA-binding proteins, they mediate gene expression via post-translational modifications of a wide range of protein targets, including TCS response regulators, and key components of the transcriptional and translational machineries. This mechanism ensures an additional level of control of TCS-mediated gene expression, which increases the versatility of bacterial adaptation to changing environmental conditions. As shown for B. subtilis, a Gram-positive model bacterium widely used in both basic research and industrial applications, its PrkC kinase and PrpC phosphatase are involved in spore development and biofilm formation [51,181]. The YkwC oxidoreductase is a target of both these enzymes. Phosphorylation of this protein at Ser281 abolishes its activity. Similarly, in the important human pathogen M. tuberculosis, STP PstP has been found to be required for accurate cell division and survival [136]. Enzymes with STK and STP activities also affect cell growth, segregation, and virulence in Streptococcus pyogenes (SP-STK and SP-STP) and S. agalactiae (Stk1 and Stp1) [64,66]. Among other substrates, S. agalactiae Stk1 phosphorylates CovR (control of virulence), which is a regulatory component of the TCS CovR/CovS that modulates the expression of over 100 genes associated with virulence, including a gene encoding β-hemolysin [182,183]. Similarly, in S. pyogenes (also known as Group A Streptococcus), the CovR/CovS system regulates the expression of a large number of virulence genes, and several products of these genes are SP-STK targets (including CovR) [184,185]. Agarwal and others [67] described that S. pyogenes non-polar SP-STP mutants displayed several morphological changes, such as increased bacterial chain length, thickened cell wall, and reduced capsule and hemolysin production. Moreover, SP-STK is involved in the regulation of S. pyogenes cell division [67,148]. Similar regulatory relationships between STK/STP and TCS signaling pathways have been found in another human pathogen, S. pneumoniae. Transcriptional regulator RitR (Rit stands for “repressor of iron transport”), an S. agalactiae CovR homolog, is important for the virulence of this bacterium. The RitR negatively regulates the expression of a gene coding for the iron uptake transporter Piu, and its activity is regulated by reversible phosphorylation by both StkP kinase and PhpP phosphatase [70,186]. A high complexity of regulation of gene expression via STK/STP signaling has been observed in M. tuberculosis. In this bacterium, 11 STKs (PknA–L) identified thus far recognize and phosphorylate a large range of protein substrates related to various cellular processes, such as cell wall biosynthesis (involved in mycolic acid synthesis (FadD, FabH, KasA, KasB, MabA, and GlmU) and arabinan synthesis (EmbR)), glycogen recycling (GarA), cell division (FtsZ, MurD, and Wag31), heat shock response (GroEL1), and transcription regulation (RshA and SigH) (Table 1) (Figure 3). Moreover, individual Pkn kinases can be substrates of other Pkn enzymes, as has been reported for PknA and PknB, which are each other’s targets. EmbR is a very important protein among the different STK M. tuberculosis substrates. This transcriptional regulator from the OmpR-like family plays an important role in cell wall biosynthesis through the regulation of embC, embA, and embB genes encoding three arabinosyltransferases [28,41]. EmbR is a target of several mycobacterial STKs (PknA, PknB, PknH, and PknJ). It has been reported that phosphorylation of this regulatory protein by PknH enhances its ability to bind to the promoter sequences of embC, embA, and embB genes. Interestingly, considering that the only M. tuberculosis STP identified thus far is PstP, this protein is thought to dephosphorylate all STKs and their protein substrates. In fact, STKs: PknA, PknB, PknH, and PknJ are among the biochemically confirmed substrates of PstP (Table 2). Thus, PstP, as the sole STP, is extremely important for mycobacterial pathogenesis. These findings illustrate the high complexity of gene regulatory network in this bacterium, in which STKs play a major role. Similarly, Stk1 (also called PknB), the only STK identified in S. aureus to date, recognizes and phosphorylates a large set of proteins, including two global regulatory proteins, SarA and MgrA (Table 1). The former is involved in the regulation of ca. 100 genes, including the positive regulation of agrBDCA expression and negative regulation of the expression of its own gene [187,188]. AgrC and AgrA are the sensor and response proteins, respectively, of a TCS system that senses critical extracellular concentrations of an octapeptide that acts as a quorum sensing signaling molecule in this bacterium. Another global transcriptional regulator, MgrA, is involved in the regulation of the expression of many genes, including a gene encoding a multi-drug efflux pump component, NorA [151,189,190,191,192]. Phosphorylation of MgrA by Stk1 prevents its binding to the norA promoter, resulting in increased norA transcription [77,190,191]. In contrast with Gram-positive bacteria, considerably less data are available for STKs and STPs in Gram-negative bacteria (Table 1 and Table 2). One of the first identified STKs was that from M. xanthus, a Gram-negative soil bacterium that, in response to environmental stress factors, can shift from vegetative growth to the formation of fruiting bodies [193]. Six STKs have been identified in this bacterium (Pkn2, Pkn4, Pkn5, Pkn6, Pkn8, and Pkn14). Among them, Pkn8 and Pkn14 are involved in the regulation of the activity of MrpC, a transcriptional factor essential for the activation of gene expression during fruiting body development. In this regulatory cascade, the membrane kinase Pkn8 phosphorylates the cytoplasmic kinase Pkn14, which subsequently phosphorylates MrpC [92,194]. Phosphorylation of MrpC by Pkn14 prevents its binding to the mrpC promoter sequence. Thus, Pkn8/Pkn14-mediated phosphorylation of MrpC represses mrpC gene expression during vegetative growth and allows for timely expression of fruA, and, in a consequence, fruiting body development in response to environmental stressors. Hanks-type serine/threonine kinase and phosphatase (STK and STP enzymes) have also been identified and biochemically characterized in P. aeruginosa [107,108,159]. It has been reported that the STK PpkA is a FHA domain-containing protein, whereas the STP PppA is an Mn2+-dependent phosphatase belonging to the PP2C family. Both these P. aeruginosa enzymes are involved in biofilm formation, tolerance to stress, and virulence. Further, the presence of numerous STKs has been confirmed in Synechocystis sp. and Anabaena sp. These proteins are engaged in the regulation of cell growth and adaptation to stress conditions (Table 1) [93,94,95,96,99,100,101,102,103,195]. Surprisingly, very little is known about STKs and STPs of the soil and symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Recently, several genes encoding putative STKs and STPs have been identified in the genome of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii Rt24.2, a nitrogen-fixing symbiont of clover plants (Trifolium pratense) [111,165]. Among these genes, pssZ, encoding a protein that shares a high similarity with STPs, was identified in the genomic Pss-I region. This region is involved in the synthesis of acidic exopolysaccharide (EPS), which plays an essential role in the symbiotic interactions of many rhizobial strains with their host legumes [196]. The pleiotropic effects of a pssZ mutation, including the lack of EPS production, decreased growth and motility, altered cell-surface properties, and failure to infect the host plant, indicate that the STP PssZ is required for several cellular processes, both in the free-living state and during symbiosis. It is also important to note than many recent studies in bacteria indicate the existence of additional levels of regulation between the different phosphorylation systems, such as cross-phosphorylation of protein kinases. A good example is the bacterium M. tuberculosis, in which cross-phosphorylation between various Hanks-type STKs, as well as their phosphorylation by protein Tyr-kinases have been confirmed [3,197].

3.2. The Role of STKs and STPs in Regulation of Transcription and Protein Biosynthesis

Apart from many response regulators of various TCSs, different protein components of the transcriptional and translational machineries have been found to be STK and STP substrates (Figure 3). These include: the histone-like protein HU, and the elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu (Table 1 and Table 2). Similarly to histones in eukaryotes, bacterial histone-like proteins play an essential role in the regulation of DNA replication and transcription, most probably by introducing structural changes in the DNA that facilitate or prevent binding of other regulatory proteins to DNA [198,199,200]. As shown for E. coli, the histone-like protein HU regulates the transcription of ca. 8% genes [200]. Recent studies have shown that histone-like proteins are substrates of several STKs and STPs in other bacteria, such as Stk1 from S. aureus, Pkn2 from M. xanthus, and SP-STK and SP-STP from S. pyogenes (Table 1 and Table 2) [89,148,151]. As described for M. xanthus, phosphorylation of HUα by Pkn2 prevents its binding to DNA [89]. HUα and HUβ are highly conserved in bacteria, and these proteins function in the regulation of gene expression, acting as heterodimers. Post-translational modifications of histone-like proteins by STKs may affect their binding to DNA or their binding to other transcriptional regulators. Moreover, STKs and STPs have found to be engaged in the modulation of activity of DNA and RNA polymerases by reversibly phosphorylating these enzymes. For example, RpoA, the α subunit of RNA polymerase, has been identified as a substrate of S. pneumoniae StkP (Table 1), suggesting that this kinase may regulate gene expression by controlling the interaction of RpoA with certain transcription factors [74]. In L. monocytogenes, PrkA interacts with several proteins that are crucial for replication and transcription, such as the DNA polymerase III subunit α (PolC), the RNA polymerase subunits α and β (RpoA and RpoB), and the recombination protein RecA [105]. Several translation elongation factors, which play an essential role in protein biosynthesis, are substrates of prokaryotic STKs and STPs (Figure 3). Three different factors are engaged in the initiation of the translation elongation step: EF-Tu, EF-Ts, and EF-G. EF-Tu is responsible for delivering aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosome acceptor site and association with GTP; EF-Ts acts as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor on EF-Tu; and EF-G is an additional GTPase involved in the translocation of mRNA and tRNA [105,157]. In the spore-forming soil bacterium B. subtilis, the kinase PrkC and phosphatase PrpC reversibly phosphorylate the elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G [47,52]. Phosphorylation of EF-Tu prevents its binding to aminoacyl-tRNA and thus inhibits the translation elongation step [157]. EF-Tu is also a substrate of PknB in M. tuberculosis [201]. Phosphorylation of this protein reduces its interaction with GTP, increasing resistance to specific antibiotics and decreasing the total level of protein synthesis, which can promote dormancy of M. tuberculosis cells. Similarly in L. monocytogenes, EF-Tu and EF-G are substrates of the kinase PrkA. Furthermore, Burnside and others [66] showed that in S. agalactiae, ATP-dependent DNA and RNA helicases are targets of the kinase Stk1. Collectively, these data suggest that the regulation of the activity of translation elongation factors by phosphorylation in bacteria may serve the purpose of adjusting the level of protein synthesis in response to changing environmental conditions.

3.3. The Role of STKs and STPs in Cell Wall Architecture and Metabolism, Cellular Metabolism, Cell Division, and Adaptation to Stress Conditions

Several proteins involved in cell envelope and membrane biogenesis have been identified as substrates of prokaryotic STKs and STPs (Table 1 and Table 2) (Figure 3). Among the different bacterial species studied, M. tuberculosis stands out because of the large set of STKs involved in this process. Almost all STKs identified in this bacterium (PknA, PknB, PknD, PknE, PknF, PknI, PknK, and PknL) are involved in the biosynthesis of mycolic acids, which are major and specific lipid components of the mycobacterial cell envelope essential for cell survival [202]. These STKs phosphorylate several proteins engaged in the mycolic acid biosynthesis pathway, such as FadD, FabH, KasA, KasB, and MabA. In addition, STKs PknA, PknB, PknH, and PknJ are involved in the regulation of the synthesis of arabinan, an important polysaccharide component of the mycobacterial cell wall. Moreover, PknA and PknB also affect cell division, since they phosphorylate two important proteins involved in this process, FtsZ and FipA (the latter is required for cell division under oxidative stress) [203]. Hanks-type serine/threonine kinases (STKs) with PASTA repeats in the extracellular domain are supposed to sense cell wall-related processes and to be engaged in the regulation of cell wall/envelope biogenesis. This hypothesis has been confirmed for the B. subtilis PASTA-containing STK PrkC, which is indispensable for the response of dormant spores and growing cells to peptidoglycan derivatives (muropeptides) [53,128]. A direct and specific interaction between the PASTA domains of this enzyme and muropeptides has indeed been confirmed [204]. In addition, PrkC phosphorylates YvcK, a protein responsible for the adequate localization and function of penicillin-binding protein 1 (PBP1), which is required for cell wall morphogenesis [205]. In this bacterium, all of the Hanks-type STKs characterized to date except for PrkD (PrkA, PrkC, and YabT) are engaged at different stages of the sporulation process (onset, dormancy, germination, and outgrowth) [49,203,206]. While PrkC participates in the initiation of the spore germination process, YabT is involved in inhibition of protein synthesis in the spore during dormancy. Expression of the genes encoding PrkA and YabT strongly increases during sporulation as a result of the action of the spore-specific sigma factors δE and δF, respectively. PrkA positively affects the expression of a gene encoding another sigma factor important for sporulation, δK [46,49]. YabT contains DNA-binding domain and is able to phosphorylate the DNA-related RecA protein, RacA (which is involved in the anchoring of DNA to the cell pole), and the global transcriptional regulator AbrB [49,206]. In S. aureus, the PASTA-containing Stk1 and its cognate phosphatase Stp1 also play essential roles in the modulation of cell wall structure and susceptibility to cell wall-acting β-lactam antibiotics [150,152]. Moreover, a strain lacking both these proteins exhibited essential defects in cell division, including irregular cell shape and size, and multiple and incomplete septa. This suggests an important role of Stk1 and Stp1 in cell division. Moreover, the Stk/Stp system has been found to participate in numerous metabolic pathways, including glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, nucleotide metabolism, and synthesis and secretion of some virulence factors (e.g., α-hemolysin) [152]. Similarly, the Stk/Stp system regulates peptidoglycan structure and metabolism in Enterococcus faecium (by influencing the crosslinking l,d-transpeptidase pathway) [87]. Interestingly, it has been recently reported that the STP PssZ of the soil bacterium R. leguminosarum is involved in the synthesis of EPS, which plays an essential role as a signal molecule in symbiotic interactions with its host plant, clover [165]. A mutant strain lacking a functional PssZ showed, apart from changes in the cell-surface properties, defects in cell division and size. Although protein substrates of this enzyme remain to be identified, this finding suggests that STKs and STPs play important role in the synthesis of envelope components and proper cell division also in Gram-negative bacteria. In different streptococci (S. agalactiae, S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, and S. mutans), the regulatory STK/STP system is involved in human pathogenesis and affects cell growth and morphology, the production of hemolysin and fatty acids, and DNA topology (via modulation of the activity of histone-like proteins) [134]. In addition, S. pyogenes Stp is a secreted phosphatase that, after entering the host cell, mediates its apoptosis [146]. Moreover, bacterial STK/STP systems are involved in the regulation of various metabolic processes (Table 1 and Table 2) (Figure 3). For example, in M. tuberculosis, numerous STKs (PknB, PknD, PknE, PknF, PknG, and PknH) regulate glycogen recycling by directly acting on the protein GarA. In B. subtilis, PrkC affects central metabolism by phosphorylating AlsD, YwjH, and GlnA, whereas Corynebacterium glutamicum kinases PknA, PknB, and PknG are engaged in glutamate metabolism (Table 1). Interestingly, among the various identified and biochemically characterized STKs in the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803, high specificity of individual proteins to particular cellular processes was found. For example, SpkB participates in motility and the oxidative stress response [95,207,208,209]. A spkB mutant exhibits a pronounced hypersensitivity to oxidative stress and severe growth retardation, whereas a spkD mutant displays impaired growth at low concentrations of inorganic carbon sources and a spkG mutant is sensitive to high salt concentrations [97,99]. Furthermore, among several STKs identified in another cyanobacterium, Anabaena sp. PCC7120, which is able to form nitrogen-fixing heterocysts, PknE and PssH are required for heterocyst development and diazotrophic growth, respectively [101,104].

4. Conclusions

Reversible phosphorylation is a key mechanism that enables bacteria to sense and respond to changing environmental conditions. Signal sensing and transduction in bacteria are conducted by various regulatory systems, including TCSs and STKs/STPs. Many recent studies indicate that pathways controlled by Hanks-type STKs and STPs play an essential role in the regulation of various cellular processes, such as growth and cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, sporulation, biofilm formation, stress response, metabolic and developmental processes, and virulence. STKs and STPs function in the regulation of gene expression by reversibly phosphorylating many protein targets that are involved in bacterial signaling and physiology. However, identification of environmental signals that trigger the signaling cascade and the elucidation of mechanisms that regulate the crosstalk between STK/STP signaling enzymes, elements of TCSs, and the translational machinery require further study. Results of these studies will facilitate understanding of the function of prokaryotic regulatory networks.
  208 in total

Review 1.  Archaeal protein kinases and protein phosphatases: insights from genomics and biochemistry.

Authors:  Peter J Kennelly
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis PknB supports a universal activation mechanism for Ser/Thr protein kinases.

Authors:  Tracy A Young; Benedicte Delagoutte; James A Endrizzi; Arnold M Falick; Tom Alber
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-03

Review 3.  Role of eukaryotic-like serine/threonine kinases in bacterial cell division and morphogenesis.

Authors:  Sylvie Manuse; Aurore Fleurie; Laure Zucchini; Christian Lesterlin; Christophe Grangeasse
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 16.408

4.  PrpZ, a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2C with dual substrate specificity.

Authors:  Sio Mei Lai; Hervé Le Moual
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 5.  Exploring the diversity of protein modifications: special bacterial phosphorylation systems.

Authors:  Ivan Mijakovic; Christophe Grangeasse; Kürşad Turgay
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Eukaryotic-like Kinase Expression in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli: Potential for Enhancing Host Aggressive Inflammatory Response.

Authors:  Tao Li; Zhan Li; Fanghong Chen; Xiong Liu; Nianzhi Ning; Jie Huang; Hui Wang
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Phosphorylation of the RitR DNA-binding domain by a Ser-Thr phosphokinase: implications for global gene regulation in the streptococci.

Authors:  Andrew T Ulijasz; Shaun P Falk; Bernard Weisblum
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Stk1-mediated phosphorylation stimulates the DNA-binding properties of the Staphylococcus aureus SpoVG transcriptional factor.

Authors:  Markus Bischoff; Solène Brelle; Sabrina Minatelli; Virginie Molle
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Forkhead-associated domain-containing protein Rv0019c and polyketide-associated protein PapA5, from substrates of serine/threonine protein kinase PknB to interacting proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Meetu Gupta; Andaleeb Sajid; Gunjan Arora; Vibha Tandon; Yogendra Singh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Genetic and biochemical analysis of the serine/threonine protein kinases PknA, PknB, PknG and PknL of Corynebacterium glutamicum: evidence for non-essentiality and for phosphorylation of OdhI and FtsZ by multiple kinases.

Authors:  Christian Schultz; Axel Niebisch; Astrid Schwaiger; Ulrike Viets; Sabine Metzger; Marc Bramkamp; Michael Bott
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  17 in total

1.  The secreted protein kinase CstK from Coxiella burnetii influences vacuole development and interacts with the GTPase-activating host protein TBC1D5.

Authors:  Eric Martinez; Sylvaine Huc-Brandt; Solène Brelle; Julie Allombert; Franck Cantet; Laila Gannoun-Zaki; Mélanie Burette; Marianne Martin; François Letourneur; Matteo Bonazzi; Virginie Molle
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Modular and Single-Cell Sensors of Bacterial Ser/Thr Kinase Activity.

Authors:  Christine R Zheng; Abhyudai Singh; Alexandra Libby; Pamela A Silver; Elizabeth A Libby
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 3.  The enterococcal PASTA kinase: A sentinel for cell envelope stress.

Authors:  Dušanka Djorić; Nicole E Minton; Christopher J Kristich
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.563

4.  Transcriptomic Studies Reveal that the Rhizobium leguminosarum Serine/Threonine Protein Phosphatase PssZ has a Role in the Synthesis of Cell-Surface Components, Nutrient Utilization, and Other Cellular Processes.

Authors:  Paulina Lipa; José-María Vinardell; Monika Janczarek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Chromosome Segregation Proteins as Coordinators of Cell Cycle in Response to Environmental Conditions.

Authors:  Monika Pióro; Dagmara Jakimowicz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Identification and characterization of a UbK family kinase in Porphyromonas gingivalis that phosphorylates the RprY response regulator.

Authors:  John D Perpich; Lan Yakoumatos; Parker Johns; Kendall S Stocke; Zackary R Fitzsimonds; Daniel W Wilkey; Michael L Merchant; Daniel P Miller; Richard J Lamont
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Regulation of Protein Post-Translational Modifications on Metabolism of Actinomycetes.

Authors:  Chen-Fan Sun; Yong-Quan Li; Xu-Ming Mao
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-07-29

8.  Phosphorylation systems in symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria and their role in bacterial adaptation to various environmental stresses.

Authors:  Paulina Lipa; Monika Janczarek
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Rules and Exceptions: The Role of Chromosomal ParB in DNA Segregation and Other Cellular Processes.

Authors:  Adam Kawalek; Pawel Wawrzyniak; Aneta Agnieszka Bartosik; Grazyna Jagura-Burdzy
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-01-11

10.  Role of diversity-generating retroelements for regulatory pathway tuning in cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Alec Vallota-Eastman; Eleanor C Arrington; Siobhan Meeken; Simon Roux; Krishna Dasari; Sydney Rosen; Jeff F Miller; David L Valentine; Blair G Paul
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.