| Literature DB >> 30248092 |
Tatiana Peretolchina1,2, Márcio G Pavan1,3, Jessica Corrêa-Antônio1, Rodrigo Gurgel-Gonçalves4, Marli M Lima5, Fernando A Monteiro1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rhodnius nasutus, a vector of the etiological agent Trypanosoma cruzi, is one of the epidemiologically most relevant triatomine species of the Brazilian Caatinga, where it often colonizes rural peridomestic structures such as chicken coops and occasionally invades houses. Historical colonization and determination of its genetic diversity and population structure may provide new information towards the improvement of vector control in the region. In this paper we present thoughtful analyses considering the phylogeography and demographic history of R. nasutus in the Caatinga. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30248092 PMCID: PMC6195287 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Sampling localities, number of Rhodnius-infested Copernicia prunifera palm trees and sample sizes of R. nasutus used in each molecular analysis.
| Sampling locations | Geographical coordinates | Palms | Triatomines | Year | Code | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP | Infestation (%) | Habitat | NR | N* | N┼ | ||||
| 1. Altos, Piauí | 05°02´S 42°28´W | 5 | 80 | Sylvatic | 12 | 4 | 2 | 2010 | ALT |
| 2. Campo Maior, Piauí | 04°49´S 42°10´W | 8 | 50 | Sylvatic | 21 | 16 | 20 | 2010 | CAM |
| 3. Parnaíba, Piauí | 02°54´S 41°46´W | 5 | 80 | Peridomestic | 26 | 18 | 18 | 2010 | PAR |
| 4. Piracuruca, Piauí | 03°55´S 41°43´W | 4 | 75 | Peridomestic | 9 | 9 | 8 | 2010 | PIR |
| 5. Jaguaruana, Ceará | 04°50´S 37°46´W | 5 | - | Peridomestic | 44 | 32 | 44 | 2004 | JAG |
| 6. Serra Talhada, Pernambuco | 07°59´S 38°17´W | 7 | 57 | Sylvatic | 23 | 15 | 13 | 2010 | STA |
| 7. Sousa, Paraíba | 06°45´S 38°13´W | 6 | 100 | Peridomestic | 44 | 28 | 26 | 2010 | SOU |
| 8. Carnaúba dos Dantas, Rio Grande do Norte | 06°33´S 36°35´W | 13 | 54 | Sylvatic | 49 | 25 | 24 | 2010 | CAR |
NP: number of palms infested with Rhodnius specimens
1: Sylvatic–forested areas >200m-distant from human dwellings, Peridomestic–deforested area <200m-distant from human dwellings; NR: number of Rhodnius specimens collected; N*: sample sizes used in microsatellite analyses; N┼: sample sizes used in cyt b analyses.
Fig 1A–Maximum clade credibility species tree reconstructed with 595-bp cyt b sequences of 156 Rhodnius specimens. Posterior probabilities above 0.95 are show for key nodes. B–Coalescent gene tree with 147 sequences of 595-bp cyt b. GenBank accession numbers of R. nasutus sequenced in this study are MG734978-MG735124. The accession numbers of the sequences retrieved from GenBank are shown on the tips of their respective tree stems.
Fig 2A–Geographical distribution of Rhodnius nasutus cytb haplotypes in each sampled locality in northeastern Brazil. Slice sizes are proportional to haplotype frequency. B—Haplotype network based on cyt b sequences. Circle sizes are proportional to haplotype frequency.
Molecular diversity indices for the R. nasutus sequences collected in eight localities.
| Localities | N | S | π (±SD) | h | Hd (± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1 | 0.00112 (± 0.00034) | 2 | 0.667 (± 0.204) | |
| 16 | 2 | 0.00078 (± 0.00028) | 3 | 0.433 (± 0.138) | |
| 25 | 0 | 0.00000 | 1 | 0.000 | |
| 32 | 2 | 0.00021 (± 0.00013) | 3 | 0.123 (± 0.078) | |
| 18 | 5 | 0.00253 (± 0.00074) | 4 | 0.471 (± 0.130) | |
| 9 | 4 | 0.00205 (± 0.00058) | 4 | 0.694 (± 0.147) | |
| 28 | 1 | 0.00012 (± 0.00011) | 2 | 0.071 (± 0.065) | |
| 15 | 2 | 0.00124 (± 0.00033) | 3 | 0.553 (± 0.126) | |
| 147 | 15 | 0.00322 (± 0.00023) | 16 | 0.826 (± 0.018) |
N = sample size, S = number of polymorphic sites, π = nucleotide diversity, SD = standard deviation, h = number of haplotypes; Hd = haplotype diversity.
Pairwise FST values for microsatellite data (above the diagonal) and cyt b data (below the diagonal).
| Localities | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.64 | ||
| 0.20 | - | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.53 | |
| 0.74 | 0.77 | - | 0.16 | 0.42* | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.64 | |
| 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.58 | - | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.55 | |
| 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.89 | - | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.19 | |
| 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.98 | - | 0.47 | 0.65 | |
| 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.58 | 0.92 | 0.91 | - | 0.53 | |
| 0.44 | 0.06 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.83 | - |
* Significant results (P < 0.013)
Fig 3A—Mismatch distribution for R. nasutus based on cyt b sequences. Bars represent observed values, lines represent expected values under the model of sudden population growth; B—Calibrated demographic history of R. nasutus and reconstructed paleoclimatic history. Shaded areas correspond to 1st and 3rd Marine Isotope Stages.
Microsatellite genetic variation (seven loci) for the four groups of R. nasutus.
| 52 | 48 | 50 | 44 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 0.157± 0.153 | -0.063 (0.851) | ||
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 10 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| ND | ND | 0.381 | 0.795 | |||||||
| ND | ND | 0.372 | 0.728 | |||||||
| 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 64 | 68 | 67 | 0.255 ± 0.169 | |||
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| 0.015 | 0.044 | 0.162 | 0.485 | 0.266 | 0.328 | |||||
| 0.015 | 0.044 | 0.152 | 0.543 | 0.255 | 0.326 | |||||
| 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0.255 ± 0,169 | -0.036(0.674) | ||
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 | ||||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 0.692 | 0.077 | ND | 0.462 | 0.615 | ND | |||||
| 0.508 | 0.077 | ND | 0.394 | 0.658 | ND | |||||
| 26 | 26 | 26 | 25 | 24 | 26 | 26 | 0.184 ± 0.136 | -0.009(0,610) | ||
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| ND | 0.077 | 0.115 | 0.640 | ND | 0.077 | 0.231 | ||||
| ND | 0.147 | 0.111 | 0.525 | ND | 0.145 | 0.217 | ||||
N—sample size for each group; NA—number of alleles at each locus; HO and HE—observed and expected heterozygosities, respectively; PA—private alleles; FIS—inbreeding coefficient; ALT–Altos, CAM–Campo Maior, PAR–Parnaíba, PIR–Piracuruca; CAR—Carnaúba dos Dantas; JAG–Jaguaruana; SOU–Sousa; STA—Serra Talhada. Significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium are shown in bold.
Fig 4A—Sampling sites map of R. nasutus specimens; B– ΔK values are shown for K ranging between 2 and 8; C—population structure of R. nasutus estimated with Structure for K = 4 organized by geographic region (on the left) and by Q value (on the right). Each vertical bar represents the individual probability of a single bug to belong to a specific genetic cluster; the color(s) in each bar represent the proportion of the individual’s genome coming from each of the four assumed clusters. Black lines separate the sampling localities. Structure diagrams for K = 2–8 are presented as supporting information (S1 Fig).
SHUA indexes (above the diagonal), FST values (below the diagonal) and HA indexes (in diagonal) among the four groups of R. nasutus determined based on seven microsatellite loci.
| Pairwise | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.955 | 0.270 | 0.159 | 0.144 | |
| 0.438 | 0.584 | 0.122 | 0.203 | |
| 0.275 | 0.418 | 0.624 | 0.197 | |
| 0.277 | 0.562 | 0.470 | 0.431 |
Group 1: ALT—Altos (Piauí), CAM—Campo Maior (Piauí), PAR—Parnaíba (Piauí), PIR—Piracuruca (Piauí); Group 2: CAR—Carnaúba dos Dantas (Rio Grande do Norte), JAG—Jaguaruana (Ceará); Group 3: STA—Serra Talhada (Pernambuco), Group 4—SOU—Sousa (Paraíba).
* P < 0.05
Ewens–Watterson neutrality test.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | ||||||||
| R31 | ND | ND | 0.985 | 0.814 | 0.512 | 0.752 | ND | ND |
| List14-010 | 0.515 | 0.810 | 0.510 | 0.690 | 0.926 | 0.748 | 0.388 | 0.456 |
| List14-025 | ND | ND | 0.851 | 0.815 | ND | ND | 0.891 | 0.785 |
| L43 | 0.461 | 0.582 | 0.621 | 0.584 | 0.486 | 0.631 | ||
| List14-021 | 0.931 | 0.563 | 0.781 | 0.815 | 0.858 | 0.754 | 0.858 | 0.790 |
| List14-064 | 0.255 | 0.266 | 0.688 | 0.448 | 0.367 | 0.318 | 0.786 | 0.444 |
| List14-013 | 0.633 | 0.420 | 0.747 | 0.811 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
F−observed homozygosity, F−expected homozygosity. F and F values indicating significant difference (P < 0.05) are shown in bold.
Fig 5A—Populational network based on microsatellite data showing two populations (1 and 3) as source of migrants for all others, based on higher values of degree and betweenness components. Red circles represent the fundamental units of the system (i.e. source-sink populations). Each line represents the connection of a source population to a sink population. Line thickness is proportional to linkage strength of such relationships. B—Migration pattern of R. nasutus in the Caatinga region based on Migrate-n analysis. The color of each stripe in the middle of the circle represents the color of the source group of migrants. The width of each stripe is proportional to the number of migrants.
Model selection with Migrate-n.
| No | Migration pattern | Harmonic lmL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1─>2─>3<─4<─1; 4<─>2 | -487.39 | 0.00000 |
| 2 | 3─>1─>2<─3─>4 | -709.12 | 0.00000 |
| 3 | 4<─>1─>3─>2; 1─>2 | -571.86 | 0.00000 |
| 4 | 4<─>1<─>2; 1─>3 | -632.87 | 0.00000 |
| 5 | 2<─>3<─4<─>2 | -625.25 | 0.00000 |
| 6 | 1<─3<─>2─>4 | -758.89 | 0.00000 |
| 8 | 4<─1─>3─>2─>4─>3 | -579.88 | 0.00000 |
| 9 | 1<─2─>3─>1; 4<─>2 | -535.22 | 0.00000 |
| 10 | 4─>1<─2<─3─>1 | -690.89 | 0.00000 |
Arrow heads indicate the direction of migration. The highest migration pattern probability is shown in bold. No—model number, Harmonic lmL—harmonic estimates of the marginal likelihood, and P—posterior probability for each model. Population numbers correspond to: 1 –Group 1; 2 –Group 2; 3 –Group 3; 4 –Group 4.