| Literature DB >> 19061974 |
S Fitzpatrick1, P C Watts, M D Feliciangeli, M A Miles, S J Kemp.
Abstract
Rhodnius prolixus is the main vector of Chagas disease in Venezuela, where it is found colonising rural housing consisting of unplastered adobe walls with palm and/or metal roofs. Vector control failure in Venezuela may be due to the invasion of houses by silvatic populations of R. prolixus found in palms. As part of a study to determine if domestic and silvatic populations of R. prolixus are isolated, thus clarifying the role of silvatic populations in maintaining house infestations, we constructed three partial genomic microsatellite libraries. A panel of ten dinucleotide polymorphic microsatellite markers was selected for genotyping. Allele numbers per locus ranged from three to twelve, with observed and expected heterozygosity ranging from 0.26 to 0.55 and 0.32 to 0.66. The microsatellite markers presented here will contribute to the control of Chagas disease in Venezuela and Colombia through the provision of population information that may allow the design of improved control strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19061974 PMCID: PMC2651431 DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.10.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Genet Evol ISSN: 1567-1348 Impact factor: 3.342
Characterisation of ten polymorphic microsatellite loci amplified from field collected Rhodnius prolixus.
| Locus | Primer sequence (5′ → 3′) | Repeat array | Dye | Allele size range (bp) | HWE | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GenBank accession | ||||||||||||
| LIST14-056 | F: TTTCCATTTGGCTCGTTTTGC | [CA]16N14[CT]6 | PET | 57 | 158–184 | 555 | 11 | 0.56 | 4 | 30 | 0.55 | <0.0001 |
| R: GATAGTGCGATACATTTTGC | (0.62) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-017 | F: ATTGAAGGTTACTACTTGCTGC | [TG]12 | FAM | 57 | 152–166 | 555 | 7 | 0.43 | 5 | 15 | 0.31 | <0.0001 |
| R: ACGCTGCTTCATTTTTTAGTGG | (0.66) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-042 | F: TACTTCCGACTGACAACCG | [GT]9 | FAM | 50 | 170–174 | 555 | 3 | 0.53 | 3 | 5 | 0.40 | 0.0003 |
| R: GGTTTTAGTTCACCAATAGC | (0.50) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-010 | F: AATGATGACTGTATTGATGGGC | [CA]9 | FAM | 52 | 311–339 | 555 | 12 | 0.83 | 11 | 31 | 0.26* | <0.0001 |
| R: TTCGACCAACAACAACTTCCC | (0.32) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-064 | F: AGAAAATGAGCAAAACGGCC | [GT]10 | FAM | 57 | 237–247 | 555 | 6 | 0.74 | 5 | 13 | 0.27 | <0.0001 |
| R: ACAGGCAAACAACTATGACG | (0.42) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-013 | F: CATACTACACGCACACAAGACC | [AC]10 | PET | 55 | 335–345 | 555 | 6 | 0.54 | 10 | 12 | 0.50 | 0.062 |
| R: ATACTCGCATCAAGCCATTTGG | (0.53) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-021 | F: AACCTCTGAACACATCAAATGG | [TG]10 | NED | 55 | 291–299 | 555 | 4 | 0.78 | 1 | 10 | 0.27 | <0.0001 |
| R: AGCTACCTCTTGCCTCTACG | (0.37) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-037 | F: GGCGACACCCCATAGAAACC | [GT]8 | PET | 55 | 231–253 | 555 | 9 | 0.59 | 10 | 15 | 0.51 | 0.095 |
| R: ATTAAAGAACGGAAACCCCACC | (0.51) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-076 | F: AGATAGTGCGATACATTTTGCG | [AG]6N14[TG]17 | FAM | 52 | 203–235 | 305 | 12 | – | 3 | 25 | – | |
| R: GTTAGAGTTGTCCTCAAGAAGC | ||||||||||||
| LIST14-025 | F: CCGCTCTATCAACTACTCC | [TC]9[AC]7N13[AC]7 | NED | 50 | 163–181 | 555 | 7 | 0.71 | 6 | 10 | 0.43 | 0.010 |
| R: GATCCCTTATGTTTCTCAGC | (0.44) | |||||||||||
| LIST14-079 | F: TAGAGTTTTTGCTCCTGTTAGC | [CA]9N2[CA]10 | FAM | 52 | 293–329 | 305 | 10 | 0.62 | 1 | 9 | 0.41 | <0.0001 |
| R: TCCTATCTTTCGGTAAGTCCG | (0.55) |
Ta, annealing temperature of the primer pair (°C); N, number of specimens amplified for this study; Na, number of alleles; AF, frequency of the most common allele; AN, number of null alleles detected per locus, A locus was considered null after a maximum of three PCR attempts with adjusted temperature and MgCl2 levels; NG, number of genotypes detected per locus; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity. P-value-exact probability for expected Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium conditions for each locus/population combination (Arlequin v2.1).
Fig. 1The distribution of alleles at each tested locus.