Literature DB >> 30247483

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol.

Emily C Bush1, Aliya Gifford2, Crystal L Coolbaugh1, Theodore F Towse3, Bruce M Damon4, E Brian Welch5.   

Abstract

As new techniques are developed to image adipose tissue, methods to validate such protocols are becoming increasingly important. Phantoms, experimental replicas of a tissue or organ of interest, provide a low cost, flexible solution. However, without access to expensive and specialized equipment, constructing stable phantoms with high fat fractions (e.g., >50% fat fraction levels such as those seen in brown adipose tissue) can be difficult due to the hydrophobic nature of lipids. This work presents a detailed, low cost protocol for creating 5x 100 mL phantoms with fat fractions of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% using basic lab supplies (hotplate, beakers, etc.) and easily accessible components (distilled water, agar, water-soluble surfactant, sodium benzoate, gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentacetate (DTPA) contrast agent, peanut oil, and oil-soluble surfactant). The protocol was designed to be flexible; it can be used to create phantoms with different fat fractions and a wide range of volumes. Phantoms created with this technique were evaluated in the feasibility study that compared the fat fraction values from fat-water magnetic resonance imaging to the target values in the constructed phantoms. This study yielded a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.998 (95% confidence interval: 0.972-1.00). In summary, these studies demonstrate the utility of fat phantoms for validating adipose tissue imaging techniques across a range of clinically relevant tissues and organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30247483      PMCID: PMC6235120          DOI: 10.3791/57704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

Review 1.  Simulation and validation of arterial ultrasound imaging and blood flow.

Authors:  Peter R Hoskins
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  NMR imaging estimates of muscle volume and intramuscular fat infiltration in the thigh: variations with muscle, gender, and age.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Hogrel; Yoann Barnouin; Noura Azzabou; Gillian Butler-Browne; Thomas Voit; Amélie Moraux; Gaëlle Leroux; Anthony Behin; Jamie S McPhee; Pierre G Carlier
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Evaluation of six-point modified dixon and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for fat quantification: a fat-water-iron phantom study.

Authors:  Kei Fukuzawa; Tatsuya Hayashi; Junji Takahashi; Chiharu Yoshihara; Masakatsu Tano; Jun'ichi Kotoku; Satoshi Saitoh
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-08-02

4.  Liver fat quantification by dual-echo MR imaging outperforms traditional histopathological analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Dimitri A Raptis; Matteo Montani; Rolf Graf; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Daniel Nanz; Hatem Alkadhi; Hans Scheffel
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Quantitative MRI and strength measurements in the assessment of muscle quality in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  B H Wokke; J C van den Bergen; M J Versluis; E H Niks; J Milles; A G Webb; E W van Zwet; A Aartsma-Rus; J J Verschuuren; H E Kan
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.296

6.  Characterization of human brown adipose tissue by chemical-shift water-fat MRI.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Thomas G Perkins; Jonathan M Chia; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Noninvasive quantitation of human liver steatosis using magnetic resonance and bioassay methods.

Authors:  Gaspard d'Assignies; Martin Ruel; Abdesslem Khiat; Luigi Lepanto; Miguel Chagnon; Claude Kauffmann; An Tang; Louis Gaboury; Yvan Boulanger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  T1 independent, T2* corrected MRI with accurate spectral modeling for quantification of fat: validation in a fat-water-SPIO phantom.

Authors:  Catherine D G Hines; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Charles A McKenzie; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Influence of Gd-EOB-DTPA on proton density fat fraction using the six-echo Dixon method in 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hayashi; Kei Fukuzawa; Hiroshi Kondo; Hiroshi Onodera; Shuji Toyotaka; Rie Tojo; Shimpei Yano; Masakatsu Tano; Tosiaki Miyati; Jun'ichi Kotoku; Takahide Okamoto; Keiko Toyoda; Hiroshi Oba
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-09-11

10.  Association of proton density fat fraction in adipose tissue with imaging-based and anthropometric obesity markers in adults.

Authors:  D Franz; D Weidlich; F Freitag; C Holzapfel; T Drabsch; T Baum; H Eggers; A Witte; E J Rummeny; H Hauner; D C Karampinos
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tissue-mimicking phantom materials with tunable optical properties suitable for assessment of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy during electrosurgery.

Authors:  Sara Azizian Amiri; Pieter Van Berckel; Marco Lai; Jenny Dankelman; Benno H W Hendriks
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Comparison of image quality and depiction of microscopic fat at 2-D and 3-D T1-Weighted (T1W) chemical shift (dual-echo) MRI for evaluation of adrenal adenomas.

Authors:  Hana Alfaleh; Gerd Melkus; Khalid Alo Nasiyabi; Matthew D F McInnes; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Cold exposure induces dynamic, heterogeneous alterations in human brown adipose tissue lipid content.

Authors:  Crystal L Coolbaugh; Bruce M Damon; Emily C Bush; E Brian Welch; Theodore F Towse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A comparison of emulsifiers for the formation of oil-in-water emulsions: stability of the emulsions within 9 h after production and MR signal properties.

Authors:  Victor Fritz; Petros Martirosian; Jürgen Machann; Rolf Daniels; Fritz Schick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.533

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.