Literature DB >> 19280194

Noninvasive quantitation of human liver steatosis using magnetic resonance and bioassay methods.

Gaspard d'Assignies1, Martin Ruel, Abdesslem Khiat, Luigi Lepanto, Miguel Chagnon, Claude Kauffmann, An Tang, Louis Gaboury, Yvan Boulanger.   

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the ability of three magnetic resonance (MR) techniques to detect liver steatosis and to determine which noninvasive technique (MR, bioassays) or combination of techniques is optimal for the quantification of hepatic fat using histopathology as a reference. Twenty patients with histopathologically proven steatosis and 24 control subjects underwent single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy (MRS; 3 voxels), dual-echo in phase/out of phase MR imaging (DEI) and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) examinations of the liver. Blood or urine bioassays were also performed for steatosis patients. Both MRS and DEI data allowed to detect steatosis with a high sensitivity (0.95 for MRS; 1 for DEI) and specificity (1 for MRS; 0.875 for DEI) but not DWI. Strong correlations were found between fat fraction (FF) measured by MRS, DEI and histopathology segmentation as well as with low density lipoprotein (LDL) and cholesterol concentrations. A Bland-Altman analysis showed a good agreement between the FF measured by MRS and DEI. Partial correlation analyses failed to improve the correlation with segmentation FF when MRS or DEI data were combined with bioassay results. Therefore, FF from MRS or DEI appear to be the best parameters to both detect steatosis and accurately quantify fat liver noninvasively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19280194     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1351-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

1.  Pain experienced during percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  L Castéra; I Nègre; K Samii; C Buffet
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Paul Angulo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Assessment of the variations in fat content in normal liver using a fast MR imaging method in comparison with results obtained by spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Roy Irwan; Mireille A Edens; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Relaxation effects in the quantification of fat using gradient echo imaging.

Authors:  Mark Bydder; Takeshi Yokoo; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Alyssa D Chavez; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Joel E Lavine; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 5.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  Roger K Schindhelm; Michaela Diamant; Robert J Heine
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathogenesis, identification, progression, and management.

Authors:  Eric Yan; Francisco Durazo; Myron Tong; Kurt Hong
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 7.  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an emerging pathological spectrum.

Authors:  Elie Serge Zafrani
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Assessment of donor liver steatosis: pathologist or automated software?

Authors:  Hendrik Marsman; Takakazu Matsushita; Ross Dierkhising; Walter Kremers; Charles Rosen; Lawrence Burgart; Scott L Nyberg
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Clinical, biochemical and histological correlations in a group of non-drinker subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  B Canbakan; H Senturk; V Tahan; I Hatemi; H Balci; T Toptas; A Sonsuz; M Velet; S Aydin; A Dirican; S Ozgulle; G Ozbay
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: review of a growing medical problem.

Authors:  K. Te Sligte; I. Bourass; J.P. Sels; A. Driessen; R.W. Stockbrugger; G.H. Koek
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.487

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Simultaneous assessment of liver volume and whole liver fat content: a step towards one-stop shop preoperative MRI protocol.

Authors:  Gaspard d'Assignies; Claude Kauffmann; Yvan Boulanger; Marc Bilodeau; Valérie Vilgrain; Gilles Soulez; An Tang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 4.  Liver diffusion-weighted MR imaging: the tower of Babel?

Authors:  Boris Guiu; Jean-Pierre Cercueil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Proton density fat-fraction: a standardized MR-based biomarker of tissue fat concentration.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Houchun H Hu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Biochemical determination of lipid content in hepatic steatosis by the Soxtec method.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hijona; Lander Hijona; Mikel Larzabal; Cristina Sarasqueta; Pablo Aldazabal; Juan Arenas; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  MR spectroscopy as a tool for in vivo determination of steatosis in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Milan Hájek; Monika Dezortová; Dita Wagnerová; Antonín Skoch; Luděk Voska; Irena Hejlová; Pavel Trunečka
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xin-Gui Peng; Shenghong Ju; Yujiao Qin; Fang Fang; Xin Cui; George Liu; Yicheng Ni; Gao-Jun Teng
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.922

9.  Hydrogen-1 MR spectroscopy for measurement and diagnosis of hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Patrick Georgoff; David Thomasson; Adeline Louie; Estee Fleischman; Lauren Dutcher; Haresh Mani; Shyamasundaran Kottilil; Caryn Morse; Lori Dodd; David Kleiner; Colleen Hadigan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  The diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI and 1H-MRS for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis compared with liver biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anneloes E Bohte; Jochem R van Werven; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.