Literature DB >> 30242907

The potential for citizen science to produce reliable and useful information in ecology.

Eleanor D Brown1, Byron K Williams2.   

Abstract

We examined features of citizen science that influence data quality, inferential power, and usefulness in ecology. As background context for our examination, we considered topics such as ecological sampling (probability based, purposive, opportunistic), linkage between sampling technique and statistical inference (design based, model based), and scientific paradigms (confirmatory, exploratory). We distinguished several types of citizen science investigations, from intensive research with rigorous protocols targeting clearly articulated questions to mass-participation internet-based projects with opportunistic data collection lacking sampling design, and examined overarching objectives, design, analysis, volunteer training, and performance. We identified key features that influence data quality: project objectives, design and analysis, and volunteer training and performance. Projects with good designs, trained volunteers, and professional oversight can meet statistical criteria to produce high-quality data with strong inferential power and therefore are well suited for ecological research objectives. Projects with opportunistic data collection, little or no sampling design, and minimal volunteer training are better suited for general objectives related to public education or data exploration because reliable statistical estimation can be difficult or impossible. In some cases, statistically robust analytical methods, external data, or both may increase the inferential power of certain opportunistically collected data. Ecological management, especially by government agencies, frequently requires data suitable for reliable inference. With standardized protocols, state-of-the-art analytical methods, and well-supervised programs, citizen science can make valuable contributions to conservation by increasing the scope of species monitoring efforts. Data quality can be improved by adhering to basic principles of data collection and analysis, designing studies to provide the data quality required, and including suitable statistical expertise, thereby strengthening the science aspect of citizen science and enhancing acceptance by the scientific community and decision makers.
© 2018 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  数据质量; calidad de datos; ciencia ecológica; data quality; diseño de proyectos; ecological science; project design; voluntarios; volunteers; 志愿者; 生态科学; 项目设计

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30242907      PMCID: PMC7754136          DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  20 in total

Review 1.  Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time.

Authors:  Anne E Magurran; Stephen R Baillie; Stephen T Buckland; Jan McP Dick; David A Elston; E Marian Scott; Rognvald I Smith; Paul J Somerfield; Allan D Watt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Site-occupancy distribution modeling to correct population-trend estimates derived from opportunistic observations.

Authors:  Marc Kéry; J Andrew Royle; Hans Schmid; Michael Schaub; Bernard Volet; Guido Häfliger; Niklaus Zbinden
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices.

Authors:  S T Buckland; A E Magurran; R E Green; R M Fewster
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science.

Authors:  Rick Bonney; Jennifer L Shirk; Tina B Phillips; Andrea Wiggins; Heidi L Ballard; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Julia K Parrish
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Embracing uncertainty in applied ecology.

Authors:  E J Milner-Gulland; K Shea
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.528

6.  Alternative Model-Based and Design-Based Frameworks for Inference From Samples to Populations: From Polarization to Integration.

Authors:  Sonya K Sterba
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe.

Authors:  Dirk S Schmeller; Pierre-Yves Henry; Romain Julliard; Bernd Gruber; Jean Clobert; Frank Dziock; Szabolcs Lengyel; Piotr Nowicki; Eszter Déri; Eduardas Budrys; Tiiu Kull; Kadri Tali; Bianca Bauch; Josef Settele; Chris Van Swaay; Andrej Kobler; Valerija Babij; Eva Papastergiadou; Klaus Henle
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Citizen science reveals unexpected continental-scale evolutionary change in a model organism.

Authors:  Jonathan Silvertown; Laurence Cook; Robert Cameron; Mike Dodd; Kevin McConway; Jenny Worthington; Peter Skelton; Christian Anton; Oliver Bossdorf; Bruno Baur; Menno Schilthuizen; Benoît Fontaine; Helmut Sattmann; Giorgio Bertorelle; Maria Correia; Cristina Oliveira; Beata Pokryszko; Małgorzata Ożgo; Arturs Stalažs; Eoin Gill; Üllar Rammul; Péter Sólymos; Zoltan Féher; Xavier Juan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Focal Plant Observations as a Standardised Method for Pollinator Monitoring: Opportunities and Limitations for Mass Participation Citizen Science.

Authors:  Helen E Roy; Elizabeth Baxter; Aoine Saunders; Michael J O Pocock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns.

Authors:  Ria Follett; Vladimir Strezov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automatic detection of alien plant species in action camera images using the chopped picture method and the potential of citizen science.

Authors:  Kosuke Takaya; Yu Sasaki; Takeshi Ise
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.014

2.  Differential reporting of biodiversity in two citizen science platforms during COVID-19 lockdown in Colombia.

Authors:  Lina María Sánchez-Clavijo; Sindy Jineth Martínez-Callejas; Orlando Acevedo-Charry; Angélica Diaz-Pulido; Bibiana Gómez-Valencia; Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela; David Ocampo; María Helena Olaya-Rodríguez; Juan Carlos Rey-Velasco; Carolina Soto-Vargas; Jose Manuel Ochoa-Quintero
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 7.497

3.  The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations.

Authors:  Ravi Bandara Dissanayake; Mark Stevenson; Rachel Allavena; Joerg Henning
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health.

Authors:  Nathan Brown; Ana Pérez-Sierra; Peter Crow; Stephen Parnell
Journal:  CABI Agric Biosci       Date:  2020-10-30

5.  Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.

Authors:  Mariano J Feldman; Louis Imbeau; Philippe Marchand; Marc J Mazerolle; Marcel Darveau; Nicole J Fenton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.