Literature DB >> 33705414

Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.

Mariano J Feldman1, Louis Imbeau1, Philippe Marchand1, Marc J Mazerolle2, Marcel Darveau2,3, Nicole J Fenton1.   

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and classify species occurrence data. For scientists, CS offers a low-cost approach of collecting species occurrence information at large spatial scales that otherwise would be prohibitively expensive. We examined the trends and gaps linked to the use of CS as a source of data for species distribution models (SDMs), in order to propose guidelines and highlight solutions. We conducted a quantitative literature review of 207 peer-reviewed articles to measure how the representation of different taxa, regions, and data types have changed in SDM publications since the 2010s. Our review shows that the number of papers using CS for SDMs has increased at approximately double the rate of the overall number of SDM papers. However, disparities in taxonomic and geographic coverage remain in studies using CS. Western Europe and North America were the regions with the most coverage (73%). Papers on birds (49%) and mammals (19.3%) outnumbered other taxa. Among invertebrates, flying insects including Lepidoptera, Odonata and Hymenoptera received the most attention. Discrepancies between research interest and availability of data were as especially important for amphibians, reptiles and fishes. Compared to studies on animal taxa, papers on plants using CS data remain rare. Although the aims and scope of papers are diverse, species conservation remained the central theme of SDM using CS data. We present examples of the use of CS and highlight recommendations to motivate further research, such as combining multiple data sources and promoting local and traditional knowledge. We hope our findings will strengthen citizen-researchers partnerships to better inform SDMs, especially for less-studied taxa and regions. Researchers stand to benefit from the large quantity of data available from CS sources to improve global predictions of species distributions.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33705414      PMCID: PMC7951830          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  36 in total

1.  Climate and the range dynamics of species with imperfect detection.

Authors:  Res Altwegg; Marius Wheeler; Birgit Erni
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Modelling the effect of habitat fragmentation on range expansion in a butterfly.

Authors:  Robert J Wilson; Zoe G Davies; Chris D Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A new dawn for citizen science.

Authors:  Jonathan Silvertown
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  A quantitative climate-match score for risk-assessment screening of reptile and amphibian introductions.

Authors:  Nicola J van Wilgen; Núria Roura-Pascual; David M Richardson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Expert variability provides perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of citizen-driven intertidal monitoring program.

Authors:  T E Cox; J Philippoff; E Baumgartner; C M Smith
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Can incidental sighting data be used to elucidate habitat preferences and areas of suitable habitat for a cryptic species?

Authors:  Wesley R Hauser; Sigrid R Heise-Pavlov
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.654

7.  The invisible prevalence of citizen science in global research: migratory birds and climate change.

Authors:  Caren B Cooper; Jennifer Shirk; Benjamin Zuckerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Citizen surveillance for environmental monitoring: combining the efforts of citizen science and crowdsourcing in a quantitative data framework.

Authors:  Marijke Welvaert; Peter Caley
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-28

9.  Quantifying the degree of bias from using county-scale data in species distribution modeling: Can increasing sample size or using county-averaged environmental data reduce distributional overprediction?

Authors:  Steven D Collins; John C Abbott; Nancy E McIntyre
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  What Is Citizen Science?--A Scientometric Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Kullenberg; Dick Kasperowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Distribution Drivers of the Alien Butterfly Geranium Bronze (Cacyreus marshalli) in an Alpine Protected Area and Indications for an Effective Management.

Authors:  Emanuel Rocchia; Massimiliano Luppi; Federica Paradiso; Silvia Ghidotti; Francesca Martelli; Cristiana Cerrato; Ramona Viterbi; Simona Bonelli
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07

2.  Biodiversity Research in Central America: A Regional Comparison in Scientific Production Using Bibliometrics and Democracy Indicators.

Authors:  Jonathan A Morales-Marroquín; Regina Solis Miranda; José Baldin Pinheiro; Maria Imaculada Zucchi
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2022-07-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.