| Literature DB >> 21556137 |
Jonathan Silvertown1, Laurence Cook, Robert Cameron, Mike Dodd, Kevin McConway, Jenny Worthington, Peter Skelton, Christian Anton, Oliver Bossdorf, Bruno Baur, Menno Schilthuizen, Benoît Fontaine, Helmut Sattmann, Giorgio Bertorelle, Maria Correia, Cristina Oliveira, Beata Pokryszko, Małgorzata Ożgo, Arturs Stalažs, Eoin Gill, Üllar Rammul, Péter Sólymos, Zoltan Féher, Xavier Juan.
Abstract
Organisms provide some of the most sensitive indicators of climate change and evolutionary responses are becoming apparent in species with short generation times. Large datasets on genetic polymorphism that can provide an historical benchmark against which to test for recent evolutionary responses are very rare, but an exception is found in the brown-lipped banded snail (Cepaea nemoralis). This species is sensitive to its thermal environment and exhibits several polymorphisms of shell colour and banding pattern affecting shell albedo in the majority of populations within its native range in Europe. We tested for evolutionary changes in shell albedo that might have been driven by the warming of the climate in Europe over the last half century by compiling an historical dataset for 6,515 native populations of C. nemoralis and comparing this with new data on nearly 3,000 populations. The new data were sampled mainly in 2009 through the Evolution MegaLab, a citizen science project that engaged thousands of volunteers in 15 countries throughout Europe in the biggest such exercise ever undertaken. A known geographic cline in the frequency of the colour phenotype with the highest albedo (yellow) was shown to have persisted and a difference in colour frequency between woodland and more open habitats was confirmed, but there was no general increase in the frequency of yellow shells. This may have been because snails adapted to a warming climate through behavioural thermoregulation. By contrast, we detected an unexpected decrease in the frequency of Unbanded shells and an increase in the Mid-banded morph. Neither of these evolutionary changes appears to be a direct response to climate change, indicating that the influence of other selective agents, possibly related to changing predation pressure and habitat change with effects on micro-climate.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21556137 PMCID: PMC3083392 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1A collection of snails from a polymorphic population of Cepaea nemoralis in Poland.
This illustrates the variety of shell colours (Yellow, Pink, Brown) and banding (0, 1, 5) typically found. Photograph by Robert Cameron.
Definitions of independent variables used in the statistical analysis.
| ModHist | A 2-category factor that distinguishes samples collected post-2000 (mainly in the EML in 2009) from those collected in the 20th Cent and earlier. |
| Year | Range 1909–2009. Fitting Year as well as ModHist enables us to distinguish time effects from other cause of differences between the modern and historical samples. |
| Habitat | 4-category factor representing the habitats (woodland, hedgerow, grassland, sand dune) recognized in the EML. Note that the results shown in |
| Alt | Altitude of the sample location in m above sea level, derived from a digital elevation model, (GTOPO30) with a horizontal grid spacing of 30 arc seconds (approximately 1 kilometre) |
| JanPrecip | Average January precipitation mm/day |
| JulyPrecip | Average July precipitation mm/day |
| Temp | Temp modeled the effect of temperature as an interaction between January minimum and July maximum temperatures. |
| Location | A term including an interaction between latitude and longitude, fitted independently within the modern and the historical samples. This was used to remove the deviance due to samples being made in different places in the historic and modern periods. |
Summary of the results of General Additive Modeling of shell polymorphism in Cepaea nemoralis in the combined dataset of historical and 2009 samples collected throughout Europe.
| Phenotype | n | Dev% | ModHist | Year | Habitat | Alt | JanPrecip | JulyPrecip | Temp | Location | ||||
| Hedge | Grass | Dune | Overall | Hist | Mod | |||||||||
| Yellow | 9505 | 32.8% | ||||||||||||
| α | 0.379 | −0.002 | 0.509 | 0.649 | 1.350 | |||||||||
| t/F | 2.560 | −2.097 | 14.041 | 15.428 | 20.415 |
| 0.139 | 10.200 | 14.697 | 12.367 | 32.939 | 9.142 | ||
| P | 0.011 | 0.036 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 0.71 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Mid-banded | 9325 | 37.2% | ||||||||||||
| α | −0.096 | 0.009 | −0.075 | −0.039 | −0.798 | 5.356 | ||||||||
| t/F | −0.632 | 7.114 | −1.781 | −0.820 | −9.776 | 46.426 | 4.056 | 26.507 | 6.639 | 15.190 | 36.853 | 17.182 | ||
| P | 0.527 | <0.001 | 0.075 | 0.413 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| Unbanded | 9505 | 28.9% | ||||||||||||
| α | 0.146 | −0.009 | −0.119 | −0.010 | −1.159 | 7.442 | ||||||||
| t/F | 0.972 | −7.938 | −2.886 | −0.214 | −11.836 | 50.956 | 9.769 | 16.023 | 11.536 | 8.347 | 24.313 | 5.436 | ||
| P | 0.331 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.830 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Statistics shown are coefficients (α) and t-values for unsmoothed terms and F-values for smoothed terms. P-values are approximate. n = sample size (number of populations), Dev% is the percent deviance accounted for by the model. Mid-banded frequency is calculated as a percentage of banded. Coefficient values are not given for the terms entered as smooth functions, because such function cannot be described by a single coefficient.
In this case the model omitting Habitat as an independent variable fits slightly better in terms of deviance than the model including Habitat, so no test statistic or p value can be calculated.
Paired sample analysis for sites sampled within 20 km of each other in the historical and modern datasets.
|
| n | Frequency | t | P | ||
| Historic | Modern | Change | ||||
|
| 90 | |||||
| Yellow | 0.376 | 0.437 | +0.061 | 1.830 | 0.071 | |
| Unbanded | 0.228 | 0.279 | +0.051 | 1.991 | 0.050 | |
| Mid-banded | 0.347 | 0.368 | +0.021 | 0.269 | 0.789 | |
|
| 245 | |||||
| Yellow | 0.583 | 0.561 | −0.023 | −1.118 | 0.265 | |
| Unbanded | 0.240 | 0.279 | +0.038 | 2.403 | 0.017 | |
| Mid-banded | 0.267 | 0.348 | +0.081 | 3.708 | >0.001 | |
|
| 65 | |||||
| Yellow | 0.619 | 0.614 | −0.005 | 0.006 | 0.995 | |
| Unbanded | 0.263 | 0.298 | +0.034 | 0.896 | 0.374 | |
| Mid-banded | 0.401 | 0.480 | +0.079 | 1.622 | 0.110 | |
| Dunes | 52 | |||||
| Yellow | 0.534 | 0.672 | +0.138 | 2.875 | 0.006 | |
| Unbanded | 0.117 | 0.133 | +0.016 | 0.745 | 0.460 | |
| Mid-banded | 0.182 | 0.263 | +0.081 | 2.177 | 0.034 | |
n = number of pairs.
Figure 2Frequency of Yellow C. nemoralis recorded as population averages in quarter degree cells of latitude and longitude.
(a) the modern and historic datasets combined (b) the modern dataset and (c) the historical dataset. The Key shows the division of the frequency of the Yellow morph by intervals of 0.2.
Figure 3Frequency of morphs in four habitat types, as predicted from the models in .
Standard errors are shown. (a) Yellow, all differences between habitats are significant P<0.001; (b) Mid-banded, differences between dune habitat and all others are significant P<0.001. Other differences are not significant; (c) Unbanded. All differences are significant except for that between grassland and woodland. (P<0.001 for all comparisons involving dune, P = 0.023 for woodland v hedge, P = 0.027 for hedge v grassland). All P values in these comparisons were corrected for multiple testing using Bonferroni.