Literature DB >> 10924144

Attractant regulation of the aspartate receptor-kinase complex: limited cooperative interactions between receptors and effects of the receptor modification state.

J A Bornhorst1, J J Falke.   

Abstract

The manner by which the bacterial chemotaxis system responds to a wide range of attractant concentrations remains incompletely understood. In principle, positive cooperativity between chemotaxis receptors could explain the ability of bacteria to respond to extremely low attractant concentrations. By utilizing an in vitro receptor-coupled kinase assay, the attractant-dependent response curve has been measured for the Salmonella typhimurium aspartate chemoreceptor. The attractant chosen, alpha-methyl aspartate, was originally used to quantitate high receptor sensitivity at low attractant concentrations by Segall, Block, and Berg [(1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 8987-8991]. The attractant response curve exhibits limited positive cooperativity, yielding a Hill coefficient of 1.7-2.4, and this Hill coefficient is relatively independent of both the receptor modification state and the mole ratio of CheA to receptor. These results disfavor models in which there are strong cooperative interactions between large numbers of receptor dimers in an extensive receptor array. Instead, the results are consistent with cooperative interactions between a small number of coupled receptor dimers. Because the in vitro receptor-coupled kinase assay utilizes higher than native receptor densities arising from overexpression, the observed positive cooperativity may overestimate that present in native receptor populations. Such positive cooperativity between dimers is fully compatible with the negative cooperativity previously observed between the two symmetric ligand binding sites within a single dimer. The attractant affinity of the aspartate receptor is found to depend on the modification state of its covalent adaptation sites. Increasing the the level of modification decreases the apparent attractant affinity at least 10-fold in the in vitro receptor-coupled kinase assay. This observation helps explain the ability of the chemotaxis pathway to respond to a broad range of attractant concentrations in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10924144      PMCID: PMC2890267          DOI: 10.1021/bi0002737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  87 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial tactic responses.

Authors:  J P Armitage
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.517

2.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells.

Authors:  P Cluzel; M Surette; S Leibler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Covalent modification regulates ligand binding to receptor complexes in the chemosensory system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G Li; R M Weis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Methylation of a membrane protein involved in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  E N Kort; M F Goy; S H Larsen; J Adler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The range of attractant concentrations for bacterial chemotaxis and the threshold and size of response over this range. Weber law and related phenomena.

Authors:  R Mesibov; G W Ordal; J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis: regulation of demethylation.

Authors:  M R Kehry; T G Doak; F W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Enzymatic deamidation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli catalyzed by the cheB gene product.

Authors:  M R Kehry; M W Bond; M W Hunkapiller; F W Dahlquist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Chemotaxis in bacteria.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Chemotaxis toward amino acids in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R Mesibov; J Adler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  J J Falke; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 2.  How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation.

Authors:  A Bren; M Eisenbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Bright lights, abundant operons--fluorescence and genomic technologies advance studies of bacterial locomotion and signal transduction: review of the BLAST meeting, Cuernavaca, Mexico, 14 to 19 January 2001.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret; Nyles W Charon; Ann M Stock; Ann H West
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Polarity in action: asymmetric protein localization in bacteria.

Authors:  S R Lybarger; J R Maddock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Cooperativity between bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Structure of a conserved receptor domain that regulates kinase activity: the cytoplasmic domain of bacterial taxis receptors.

Authors:  J J Falke; S H Kim
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Quantitative analysis of aspartate receptor signaling complex reveals that the homogeneous two-state model is inadequate: development of a heterogeneous two-state model.

Authors:  Joshua A Bornhorst; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Electron microscopic analysis of membrane assemblies formed by the bacterial chemotaxis receptor Tsr.

Authors:  Robert M Weis; Teruhisa Hirai; Anas Chalah; Martin Kessel; Peter J Peters; Sriram Subramaniam
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Cooperativity in signal transfer through the Uhp system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Daniël T Verhamme; Pieter W Postma; Wim Crielaard; Klaas J Hellingwerf
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.