Literature DB >> 30232526

Dual offset metaphyseal-filling stems in primary total hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips after a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Goksel Dikmen1, Vahit Emre Ozden2, Burak Beksac3, Ismail Remzi Tozun2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term performance of tapered one-third proximally coated stems in dysplastic hips.
METHODS: This study included 135 dysplasia patients (150 hips) who underwent a total hip arthroplasty and had a minimum follow-up of ten years. Single design tapered stems were used in all patients. There were 112 women (83%) and 23 men (17%) with a mean age of 45 years (23 to 72) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 14.7 years (10 to 16.8). For clinical evaluation, the Harris Hip Score and Merle D'Aubigne scale were used pre-operatively and at the final follow-up. Implant survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, with failure defined as a component revision for any reason.
RESULTS: Overall, one stem was revised for a deep infection. There were no other femoral stem revisions secondary to loosening, wear, periprosthetic fracture, or instability. Radiographic evaluation showed excellent stem osteointegration in all cases. Kaplan-Meier survivorship, with stem revision for any reason as the end point, was 98% at 14 years (95% confidence interval 92.5 to 99.8).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a dual offset tapered stem achieved excellent survivorship and stability, as well as good clinical outcome scores with minimal thigh pain and stress shielding in patients with arthritis and developmental dysplasia of the hip; a dual offset tapered stem may be a suitable option for primary total hip arthroplasty in this group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysplasia; Long-term outcome; Primary total hip arthroplasty; Tapered stem

Year:  2018        PMID: 30232526     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4161-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  40 in total

1.  The mid-term results of a dual offset uncemented stem for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tony Danesh-Clough; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck; Richard McCalden
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components.

Authors:  C A Engh; P Massin; K E Suthers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  R L Wixson; S D Stulberg; G J Van Flandern; L Puri
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement.

Authors:  W D Bugbee; W J Culpepper; C A Engh; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Follow-up results of 10-12 years after total hip arthroplasty using cementless tapered stem -- frequency of severe stress shielding with synergy stem in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Tomofumi Nishino; Hajime Mishima; Haruo Kawamura; Yukiyo Shimizu; Syumpei Miyakawa; Naoyuki Ochiai
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Failure mechanisms of anatomic porous replacement I cementless total hip replacement.

Authors:  L D Dorr; K Lewonowski; M Lucero; M Harris; Z Wan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.

Authors:  H Weinans; R Huiskes; H J Grootenboer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative femoral fractures.

Authors:  R H Fitzgerald; G W Brindley; B F Kavanagh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Three-dimensional shape of the dysplastic femur: implications for THR.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Emir Kamaric; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masaaki Matsubara; Yoshitada Harada; Kenji Ohzono; Vibor Paravic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the 5-Year Outcomes Between Standard and Short Fit-and-Fill Stems in Japanese Populations.

Authors:  Suguru Kato; Masahiko Nozawa; Sungon Kim; Yuko Sakamoto; Hironori Ochi; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Mid-term results of short-stem total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe type I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Yingyong Suksathien; Thanut Tippimanchai; Tossaporn Akkrasaeng; Chakkrit Ruangboon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-01

3.  The round femoral stem provides a similar clinical outcome but more serious proximal stress shielding compared to the rectangular stem in cementless total hip arthroplasty without a shortening osteotomy in patients with Crowe type 2 or 3 hip dysplasia.

Authors:  M Enes Kayaalp; Fahri Erdogan; Gökhan Kaynak
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  Survival rates and reasons for revision of different stem designs in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia: a regional registry study.

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Francesco Castagnini; Niccolò Stefanini; Barbara Bordini; Giuseppe Geraci; Federico Pilla; Francesco Traina; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-07-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.