Literature DB >> 9195311

Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

R L Wixson1, S D Stulberg, G J Van Flandern, L Puri.   

Abstract

Bone ingrowth into uncemented femoral implants with proximal porous coatings has been designed to avoid proximal stress shielding and preserve femoral strength. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry allows repeated quantitative analysis of anteroposterior scans of the proximal femur. By use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and qualitative radiographic changes, 31 total hip arthroplasties with an individually designed, proximally porous-coated prosthesis were evaluated after surgery and at intervals up to 2 years. All implants appeared to achieve successful bone ingrowth and subsequent remodeling. At the most proximal level around the neck osteotomy, the postoperative loss of bone density at 6 months was -14.5%, which persisted at 24 months with -11.6%. At the level of the distal portion of the porous coating in the lower metaphysis, the density change was -8.7%, but bone had remodeled at 24 months with a change in density of only -1.0% compared with the immediate postoperative scan. With a design that results in reliable proximal ingrowth, this study predicts that after an initial decline in bone density, a positive bone remodeling response occurs that could lead to long-term stable fixation of the femoral implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9195311     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90191-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  17 in total

1.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.

Authors:  A I A Rahmy; T Gosens; G M Blake; A Tonino; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem.

Authors:  Alex Leali; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Changes of bone mineral density after cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different stems.

Authors:  Keiji Sano; Kouji Ito; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Preoperative bone quality as a factor in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis comparing bone remodelling between two implant types.

Authors:  Bart Cornelis Hendrikus van der Wal; Ali Rahmy; Bernd Grimm; Ide Heyligers; Alphons Tonino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Densitometric evaluation of bone-prosthetic counterface in hip and knee arthroplasty with modern implants.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Marco Giorgini; Carla Signorini; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Maria Luisa Brandi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

7.  Dual offset metaphyseal-filling stems in primary total hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips after a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Goksel Dikmen; Vahit Emre Ozden; Burak Beksac; Ismail Remzi Tozun
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Late remodeling around a proximally HA-coated tapered titanium femoral component.

Authors:  William N Capello; James A D'Antonio; Rudolph G Geesink; Judy R Feinberg; Marybeth Naughton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Changes in bone mineral density of the distal femur after revision total knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal press-fit stem.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07-15

10.  Minimal stress shielding with a Mallory-Head titanium femoral stem with proximal porous coating in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brad Ellison; Nicholas A Cheney; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.