Literature DB >> 14646700

Three-dimensional shape of the dysplastic femur: implications for THR.

Philip C Noble1, Emir Kamaric, Nobuhiko Sugano, Masaaki Matsubara, Yoshitada Harada, Kenji Ohzono, Vibor Paravic.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the three-dimensional anatomy of the femur with congenital dysplasia of the hip (CDH) in comparison with healthy controls. Computed tomographic scans were obtained from 207 women (154 with dysplasia; 54 healthy controls) with an average age of 51.6 years (range, 18-82 years). Most of the dysplastic joints were classified as Crowe I (43%), or Crowe II or III (48%), with 9% Crowe IV. Individualized three-dimensional computer models of the femur were generated by reconstruction of the CT scans. Dimensional and morphometric parameters were derived by computer analysis of each of the femoral reconstructions. The dysplastic femurs had shorter necks and smaller, straighter canals than the controls. The shape of the canal became more abnormal with increasing subluxation. Detailed analysis showed that the primary deformity of the dysplastic femur is rotational, with an increase in anteversion of 5 degrees to 16 degrees, depending on the degree of subluxation of the hip. The rotational deformity of the dysplastic femur arises within the diaphysis between the lesser trochanter and the isthmus and is not attributable to a torsional deformity of the metaphysis. This study shows that there is a significant difference in the geometry of the normal femurs and those with CDH, even in mild cases. In CDH cases, we recommend the use of modular or specially-designed components to accommodate the shape of the dysplastic canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14646700     DOI: 30.3097/01.blo.0000096819.67494.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  57 in total

1.  Long-term results of the Wagner cone prosthesis.

Authors:  Alexander Schuh; Annemarie Schraml; Gerd Hohenberger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Imaging in the surgical management of developmental dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  Leslie Grissom; H T Harcke; Mihir Thacker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Periacetabular osteotomy restores the typically excessive range of motion in dysplastic hips with a spherical head.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Corinne A Zurmühle; Marc Puls; Klaus A Siebenrock; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Shortening osteotomy for alloarthoplastic joint replacement for hip dislocation in adults].

Authors:  S W Tohtz; C Perka
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Dual offset metaphyseal-filling stems in primary total hip arthroplasty in dysplastic hips after a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Goksel Dikmen; Vahit Emre Ozden; Burak Beksac; Ismail Remzi Tozun
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia: anatomical features and technical pitfalls].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; D Bürklein; F Greimel; U Nöth; M Hoberg; H Gollwitzer; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Femoral morphologic differences in subtypes of high developmental dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  Haijun Xu; Yixin Zhou; Qing Liu; Qiheng Tang; Jianhua Yin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Is there a distinct pattern to the acetabular labrum and articular cartilage damage in the non-dysplastic hip with instability?

Authors:  Kotaro R Shibata; Shuichi Matsuda; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.

Authors:  Joel Wells; Jeffrey J Nepple; Karla Crook; James R Ross; Asheesh Bedi; Perry Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage.

Authors:  S D Steppacher; M Tannast; S Werlen; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.