Literature DB >> 6717000

Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

J W Hall, R S Tyler, M A Fernandes.   

Abstract

The masking level difference (MLD) at 500 Hz was examined in wide-band (960 Hz) and narrow-band (50 Hz) noise for normal-hearing subjects and subjects with symmetrical mild-to-moderate cochlear hearing loss. Monaural tasks of intensity discrimination, temporal resolution, and frequency resolution were performed in order to examine relationships between monaural dysfunction and MLD performance. Interaural time discrimination for a 500-Hz pure tone also was examined. The performance of the hearing-impaired subjects was poorer than that of the normal-hearing subjects for MLD, interaural delta t, and most monaural tasks. However, no significant relationships were found between monaural and MLD performance when effects of threshold were taken into account. MLDs were more reduced in wide-band noise than in narrow-band noise for the hearing-impaired subjects (when contrasted with normal-hearing subjects). MLD performance was correlated with interaural time discrimination, and it is suggested that one reason for poor MLD performance with hearing impairment may be poor temporal coding of stimulus-fine structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6717000     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2701.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  8 in total

1.  Age-related differences in binaural masking level differences: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Robert Ellis; Julie Mehta; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Relationship Between Intensity Coding and Binaural Sensitivity in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Amplification considerations for children with minimal or mild bilateral hearing loss and unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Sarah McKay; Judith S Gravel; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-03

4.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Changes in audiometric threshold and frequency selectivity correlate with cochlear histopathology in macaque monkeys with permanent noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Verification of a Mobile Psychoacoustic Test System.

Authors:  Jordana C Soares; Sangamanatha A Veeranna; Vijay Parsa; Chris Allan; Winnie Ly; Minh Duong; Paula Folkeard; Sheila Moodie; Prudence Allen
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-12-13

8.  Speech perception in noise in unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli; Marina de Marchi Dos Santos; Maria Renata José
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.