PURPOSE: To develop an accelerated, free-breathing, noncontrast, electrocardiograph-triggered, thoracic MR angiography (NC-MRA) pulse sequence capable of achieving high spatial resolution at clinically acceptable scan time and test whether it produces clinically acceptable image quality in patients with suspected aortic disease. METHODS: We modified a "coronary" MRA pulse sequence to use a stack-of-stars k-space sampling pattern and combined it with golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP reconstruction to enable self-navigation of respiratory motion and high data acceleration. The performance of the proposed NC-MRA was evaluated in 13 patients, where clinical standard contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) was used as control. For visual analysis, two readers graded the conspicuity of vessel lumen, artifacts, and noise level on a 5-point scale (overall score index = sum of three scores). The aortic diameters were measured at seven standardized locations. The mean visual scores, inter-observer variability, and vessel diameters were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The overall mean visual score index (12.1 ± 1.7 for CE-MRA versus 12.1 ± 1.0 for NC-MRA) scores were not significantly different (P > 0.16). The two readers' scores were significantly different for CE-MRA (P = 0.01) but not for NC-MRA (P = 0.21). The mean vessel diameters were not significantly different, except at the proximal aortic arch (P < 0.03). The mean diameters were strongly correlated (R2 ≥ 0.96) and in good agreement (absolute mean difference ≤ 0.01 cm and 95% confidence interval ≤ 0.62 cm). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the proposed NC-MRA produces clinically acceptable image quality in patients at high spatial resolution (1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm) and clinically acceptable scan time (~6 min).
PURPOSE: To develop an accelerated, free-breathing, noncontrast, electrocardiograph-triggered, thoracic MR angiography (NC-MRA) pulse sequence capable of achieving high spatial resolution at clinically acceptable scan time and test whether it produces clinically acceptable image quality in patients with suspected aortic disease. METHODS: We modified a "coronary" MRA pulse sequence to use a stack-of-stars k-space sampling pattern and combined it with golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP reconstruction to enable self-navigation of respiratory motion and high data acceleration. The performance of the proposed NC-MRA was evaluated in 13 patients, where clinical standard contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) was used as control. For visual analysis, two readers graded the conspicuity of vessel lumen, artifacts, and noise level on a 5-point scale (overall score index = sum of three scores). The aortic diameters were measured at seven standardized locations. The mean visual scores, inter-observer variability, and vessel diameters were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: The overall mean visual score index (12.1 ± 1.7 for CE-MRA versus 12.1 ± 1.0 for NC-MRA) scores were not significantly different (P > 0.16). The two readers' scores were significantly different for CE-MRA (P = 0.01) but not for NC-MRA (P = 0.21). The mean vessel diameters were not significantly different, except at the proximal aortic arch (P < 0.03). The mean diameters were strongly correlated (R2 ≥ 0.96) and in good agreement (absolute mean difference ≤ 0.01 cm and 95% confidence interval ≤ 0.62 cm). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the proposed NC-MRA produces clinically acceptable image quality in patients at high spatial resolution (1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm) and clinically acceptable scan time (~6 min).
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christopher J François; David Tuite; Vibhas Deshpande; Renate Jerecic; Peter Weale; James C Carr Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Tao Zhang; Joseph Y Cheng; Yuxin Chen; Dwight G Nishimura; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Thomas Benkert; Ye Tian; Chenchan Huang; Edward V R DiBella; Hersh Chandarana; Li Feng Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Daming Shen; Ryan J Avery; Ali M Serhal; Florian A Schiffers; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Oliver S Cossairt; Daniel Kim Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2020-06-25
Authors: Basel Yacoub; Robert E Stroud; Davide Piccini; U Joseph Schoepf; John Heerfordt; Jérôme Yerly; Lorenzo Di Sopra; Jonathan D Rollins; D Alan Turner; Tilman Emrich; Fei Xiong; Pal Suranyi; Akos Varga-Szemes Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 5.364