| Literature DB >> 30223570 |
Fumitaka Koga1, Kosuke Takemura2, Hiroshi Fukushima3.
Abstract
Chemoradiation-based bladder preservation therapy (BPT) is currently a curative option for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients at favorable risk or an alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) for those who are unfit for RC. In BPT, only patients who achieve complete response (CR) after chemoradiation have a favorable prognosis and quality of life with a preserved functional bladder. Thus, predicting CR and favorable prognosis is important for optimal patient selection for BPT. We reviewed biomarkers for predicting the clinical outcomes of chemoradiation-based BPT. The biomarkers studied were categorized into those related to apoptosis, cell proliferation, receptor tyrosine kinases, DNA damage response genes, hypoxia, molecular subtype, and others. Among these biomarkers, the Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI) and meiotic recombination 11 may be used for selecting BPT or RC. Ki-67 LI and erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (erbB2) may be used for predicting both the chemoradiation response and the prognosis of patients on BPT. Concurrent use of trastuzumab and a combination of carbogen and nicotinamide can overcome chemoradiation resistance conferred by erbB2 overexpression and tumor hypoxia. Further studies are needed to confirm the practical utility of these biomarkers for progress on biomarker-directed personalized management of MIBC patients.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; bladder neoplasm; bladder preservation; chemoradiation; prognosis; urothelial carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30223570 PMCID: PMC6165010 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19092777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Biomarkers associated with chemoradiation response.
| Biomarkers | Samples Used (No. Patients) | Chemoradiation Regimen | Associations with Response | Study Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Apoptotic index | Tumor tissues ( | RT 59.4 Gy + cisplatin | Higher apoptotic index was associated with a higher CR rate (86% vs. 57%, | Retrospective | [ |
| bax/bcl-2 ratio | Tumor tissues | RT 40.5 Gy (median) + cisplatin | Higher Bax/Bcl-2 ratio was associated with a higher CR rate ( | Retrospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| Ki-67 LI | Tumor tissues | RT 59.4 Gy + cisplatin | Higher Ki-67 LI was associated with a higher CR rate (86% vs. 57%, | Retrospective | [ |
| Ki-67 LI | Tumor tissues | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin, 69 (73%) underwent partial or salvage radical cystectomy | Higher Ki-67 LI (continuous variable) was associated with a higher CR rate ( | Retrospective | [ |
| ADC value | MRI | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin | Sensitivity/specificity/accuracy = 92/90/91% when ADC < 0.74 × 10−3 mm2/s | Retrospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| erbB2 | Tumor tissues | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin + other agents | CR rates, 50% vs. 81% for positive vs. negative ( | Retrospective | [ |
| erbB2 | Tumor tissues | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin | CR rates, 29% vs. 53% for positive vs. negative ( | Retrospective | [ |
| erbB2 | Tumor tissues | RT 64.8 Gy + paclitaxel with (group 1: erbB2+) or without trastuzumab (group 2: erbB2-) | CR rates, 72% for group 1 and 68% for group 2 | Prospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| ERCC1 | Tumor tissues | RT 40-66 Gy + cisplatin or nedaplatin | CR rates, 25% vs. 86% for positive vs. negative ( | Retrospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| Molecular subtype | Tumor tissues | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin | CR rates, 52%/45%/15% for GU/SCC-like/Uro ( | Retrospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| Hsp60 | Tumor tissues | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin | Positive Hsp60 was associated with better response ( | Retrospective | [ |
RT, radiotherapy; CR, complete response; LI, labeling index; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinases; erbB2, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2; DDR, DNA damage response; ERCC1, excision repair cross-complementing group 1; GU, genomically unstable subtype; SCC-like, squamous cell cancer-like subtype; Uro, urobasal subtype; Hsp60, heat shock protein 60.
Biomarkers associated with prognosis of muscle invasive bladder cancer patients on chemoradiation-based bladder preservation therapy.
| Biomarkers | Samples Used (No. Patients) | Chemoradiation Regimen | Associations with Prognosis | Study Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Ki-67LI | Tumor tissues | RT 59.4 Gy + cisplatin | Better CSS with preserved bladder for higher Ki-67 LI (50% vs. 36% at 5-year, | Retrospective | [ |
| Ki-67 LI | Tumor tissues | RT 40.5 Gy (median) + cisplatin | Worse CSS for high Ki-67 LI of > 20% ( | Retrospective | [ |
| Ki-67 LI | Tumor tissues | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin, 69 (73%) underwent partial or salvage radical cystectomy | Better CSS for high Ki-67 LI of > 20% (HR 0.3, | Retrospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| EGFR | Tumor tissues | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin + other agents | Better CSS for positive EGFR ( | Retrospective | [ |
| erbB2 | Tumor tissues | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin | Worse CSS for erbB2 overexpression (56% vs. 87%, | Retrospective | [ |
| VEGF-B/C and VEGFR2 | Tumor tissues | RT 64.8 Gy + cisplatin + other agents | Worse OS for high VEGF-B/C/R2 expression ( | Retrospective | [ |
| VEGF-C/NRP2 | Tumor tissues | RT 56.3 Gy + cisplatin | Worse OS for high NRP2 or VEGFC expression (HR 4.25, | Retrospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| MRE11 | Tumor tissues | RT 55 Gy | Better CSS for high MRE11 expression (HR 0.36, | Retrospective | [ |
| ERCC1/XRCC1 | Tumor tissues | RT 48.6 Gy (median) + cisplatin | Better CSS for positive ERCC1 or XRCC1 (HR 0.64, | Retrospective | [ |
| DDR alterations | Tumor tissues | RT or chemoradiation (details unavailable) | Trend for better RFS for the presence of DDR alterations (HR 0.37, | Retrospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| Necrosis | Tumor tissues | RT vs. RT + CON | The presence of necrosis predicted better OS for RT + CON than RT alone (HR 0.43, | Retrospective | [ |
| HIF-1α | Tumor tissues | RT vs. RT + CON | Positive HIF-1α predicted better DFS for RT + CON than RT alone (HR 0.48, | Retrospective | [ |
|
| |||||
| CRP | Serum | RT 40 Gy + cisplatin | Worse CSS for high CRP of > 0.5 mg/dL (HR 1.8, | Retrospective | [ |
| Lymphocytopenia | Blood | RT 52.5 Gy + gemcitabine | Worse RFS for lymphocytopenia of < 1.5 × 109/L (HR 3.9, | Retrospective | [ |
LI, labeling index; RT, radiotherapy; CSS, cancer-specific survival; HR, hazard ratio; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinases; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; erbB2, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2; VEGF(R), vascular endothelial growth factor (receptor); OS, overall survival; NRP2, neutropilin 2; DDR, DNA damage response; MRE11, meiotic recombination 11; ERCC1, excision repair cross-complementing group 1; XRCC1, X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1; RFS, recurrence-free survival; CON, carbogen and nicotinamide; HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; DFS, disease-free survival; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Figure 1Biomarkers that may be used for predicting and improving the chemoradiation response. Biomarkers in bold letter are also associated with favorable prognosis on bladder preservation therapy. Overexpression of erbB2 is associated with unfavorable chemoradiation response, which can be overcome by trastuzumab. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; erbB2, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2; ERCC1, excision repair cross-complementing group 1; Hsp60, heat shock protein 60; Uro subtype, urobasal subtype in the Lund University subtyping model;↑, high value;↓, low value.
Figure 2Biomarkers that may be used for predicting and improving prognosis on bladder preservation therapy. Biomarkers in bold letter are also associated with favorable chemoradiation response. Biomarkers in dark shadow are associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, which can be overcome by CON. BPT, bladder preservation therapy; CON, carbogen and nicotinamide; CRP, C-reactive protein; DDR, DNA damage response; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; erbB2, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2; HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; MRE11, meiotic recombination 11; NRP2, neutropilin 2; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;↑, increased expression;↓, decreased expression or low value.