Literature DB >> 29960059

Impact of Immunohistochemistry-Based Subtypes in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer on Response to Chemoradiation Therapy.

Hajime Tanaka1, Soichiro Yoshida2, Fumitaka Koga3, Kazuma Toda4, Ryoichi Yoshimura4, Yutaka Nakajima5, Emiko Sugawara5, Takumi Akashi5, Yuma Waseda1, Masaharu Inoue1, Toshiki Kijima1, Minato Yokoyama1, Junichiro Ishioka1, Yoh Matsuoka1, Kazutaka Saito1, Kazunori Kihara1, Yasuhisa Fujii1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A bladder-sparing strategy is a useful option for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), in which the response to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is primarily important in achieving favorable oncologic outcomes. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtyping in MIBC on prediction of CRT response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment protocol consisted of induction CRT followed by partial or radical cystectomy as consolidative surgery; 118 eligible patients with nonmetastatic MIBC were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 92 eventually underwent partial or radical cystectomy after CRT. We applied the IHC-based subtyping model developed by Lund University, which classifies patients into urobasal (Uro), genomically unstable (GU), and squamous cell cancer-like (SCCL) subtypes. GU and SCCL cancers are supposed to be highly aggressive and to have worse prognoses than Uro. Correlations of subtypes with CRT response were analyzed clinically in all patients and pathologically in 92 cystectomized patients. The impact of each subtype on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed.
RESULTS: Of all patients, 26 (22%), 61 (52%), and 31 (26%) were classified into Uro, GU, and SCCL subtypes, respectively. Clinical complete response (CR) was achieved in 42% of patients overall after CRT, with a significantly higher proportion in GU patients (52%) and SCCL patients (45%) than in Uro patients (15%; P < .001 and P = .01, respectively). On multivariate analysis, the GU/SCCL subtype was a significant predictor of clinical CR, as was absence of hydronephrosis or concomitant carcinoma in situ. Analyses for pathologic CR in the cystectomized patients revealed analogous findings. Five-year CSM of Uro, GU, and SCCL patients was 16%, 23%, and 28% overall, respectively, and 19%, 22%, and 23% in cystectomized patients, respectively, with no significant difference among the subtypes. CR status after CRT was significantly and independently correlated with low CSM in both clinical and pathologic evaluations.
CONCLUSIONS: GU and SCCL cancers showed significantly more favorable CRT response than did Uro cancers. IHC-based subtyping may improve clinical decisions about the indication of CRT for MIBC patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29960059     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

Review 1.  Trimodality therapy for bladder cancer: modern management and future directions.

Authors:  Anthony Pham; Leslie K Ballas
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Association of immunohistochemical markers of tumor subtype with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Abolfazl Razzaghdoust; Mahdi Ghajari; Abbas Basiri; Peyman Mohammadi Torbati; Anya Jafari; Mohammad Reza Fattahi; Maryam Salahi; Bahram Mofid
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 3.  [Locally advanced or oligometastatic bladder cancer-role of local treatment of the primary tumor and metastases].

Authors:  Katharina Rebhan; Kilian M Gust
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Are We Ready to Implement Molecular Subtyping of Bladder Cancer in Clinical Practice? Part 2: Subtypes and Divergent Differentiation.

Authors:  Francesca Sanguedolce; Magda Zanelli; Andrea Palicelli; Stefano Ascani; Maurizio Zizzo; Giorgia Cocco; Lars Björnebo; Anna Lantz; Matteo Landriscina; Vincenza Conteduca; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Trimodality Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recent Advances and Unanswered Questions.

Authors:  Di Maria Jiang; Peter Chung; Girish S Kulkarni; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Biomarkers for Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Chemoradiation-Based Bladder Preservation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Fumitaka Koga; Kosuke Takemura; Hiroshi Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.