Literature DB >> 29281848

Propensity matched comparative analysis of survival following chemoradiation or radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Chad R Ritch1, Raymond Balise2, Nachiketh Soodana Prakash1, David Alonzo1, Katherine Almengo1, Mahmoud Alameddine1, Vivek Venkatramani1, Sanoj Punnen1, Dipen J Parekh1, Mark L Gonzalgo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare survival outcome between chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with MIBC (≥cT2, N0, M0) in the National Cancer Database (2004-2013). CRT was defined as a radiation dose of ≥40 Gy and chemotherapy within 90 days of radiation. Descriptive statistics were used to compare groups. RC and CRT patients were propensity matched. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine predictors of survival.
RESULTS: In all, 8 379 (6 606 RC and 1 773 CRT) patients met the inclusion criteria and 1 683 patients in each group were propensity matched. On multivariable extended Cox analysis, significant predictors of decreased OS were age, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity score of 1, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity score of 2, stage cT3-4, and urothelial histology. CRT was associated with decreased mortality at year 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.96; P = 0.01), but at 2 years (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6; P < 0.001) and 3 years onward (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8; P < 0.001) CRT was associated with increased mortality. The 5-year OS was greater for RC than for CRT (38% vs 30%, P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Initially after treatment for MIBC the risk of mortality is lower with CRT compared to RC. However, at ≥2 years after treatment the mortality risk favours RC. Patients who are suitable surgical candidates, with a low risk of morbidity, may be better served by RC.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #BladderCancer; #blcsm; bladder preservation; chemoradiation; radical cystectomy; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29281848     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  14 in total

Review 1.  Bladder Preservation Therapy: Review of Literature and Future Directions of Trimodal Therapy.

Authors:  Adnan El-Achkar; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  [Radiochemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer : An update].

Authors:  N Tselis; F J Prott; O Ott; C Weiss; C Rödel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The perils of using registry data to compare the survival and cost of radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek A Solanki; Stanley L Liauw
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

4.  Chemoradiation Vs Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Comparative Analysis Using the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Dharam Kaushik; Hanzhang Wang; Joel Michalek; Michael A Liss; Qianqian Liu; Richa Priya Jha; Robert S Svatek; Ahmed M Mansour
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Screening logs from a pilot randomized controlled trial of radical cystectomy versus chemoradiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dharam Kaushik; Zheng Shi; Michael A Liss; Hanzhang Wang; Richa Priya Jha; Byeong Yeob Choi; Deepak K Pruthi; Chul S Ha; Ahmed M Mansour; Robert S Svatek
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Epidural anesthesia and cancer outcomes in bladder cancer patients: is it the technique or the medication? A matched-cohort analysis from a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Juan Chipollini; Brandon Alford; David C Boulware; Patrice Forget; Scott M Gilbert; Jorge L Lockhart; Julio M Pow-Sang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Michael A Poch; Sephalie Y Patel
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on trimodal therapy versus radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Does the current quality of evidence justify definitive conclusions?

Authors:  Marian S Wettstein; Jasjit K Rooprai; Clinsy Pazhepurackel; Christopher J D Wallis; Zachary Klaassen; Elizabeth M Uleryk; Thomas Hermanns; Neil E Fleshner; Alexandre R Zlotta; Girish S Kulkarni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Bladder-sparing protocols in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Côme Tholomier; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

Review 9.  Biomarkers for Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Chemoradiation-Based Bladder Preservation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Fumitaka Koga; Kosuke Takemura; Hiroshi Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  National Cancer Database Comparison of Radical Cystectomy vs Chemoradiotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Implications of Using Clinical vs Pathologic Staging.

Authors:  Hong-Yiou Lin; Hong Ye; Kenneth M Kernen; Jason M Hafron; Daniel J Krauss
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.