Literature DB >> 30222348

Interpreting Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Events in Proteins Using Atomistic Simulations: Case Studies on Regulators of G-Protein Signaling Proteins.

Hossein Mohammadiarani1, Vincent S Shaw2, Richard R Neubig2, Harish Vashisth1.   

Abstract

Hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) experiments are widely used in studies of protein dynamics. To predict the propensity of amide hydrogens for exchange with deuterium, several models have been reported in which computations of amide-hydrogen protection factors are carried out using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Given significant variation in the criteria used in different models, the robustness and broader applicability of these models to other proteins, especially homologous proteins showing distinct amide-exchange patterns, remains unknown. The sensitivity of the predictions when MD simulations are conducted with different force-fields is yet to tested and quantified. Using MD simulations and experimental HDX data on three homologous signaling proteins, we report detailed studies quantifying the performance of seven previously reported models (M1-M7) of two general types: empirical and fractional-population models. We find that the empirical models show inconsistent predictions but predictions of the fractional population models are robust. Contrary to previously reported work, we find that the solvent-accessible surface area of amide hydrogens is a useful metric when combined with a new metric defining the distances of amide hydrogens from the first polar atoms in proteins. On the basis of this, we report two new models, one empirical (M8) and one population-based (M9). We find strong protection of amide hydrogens from solvent exchange both within the stable helical motifs and also in the interhelical loops. We further observe that the exchange-competent states of amide hydrogens occur on the sub 100 ps time-scale via localized fluctuations, and such states among amides of a given protein do not appear to show any cooperativity or allosteric coupling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30222348      PMCID: PMC6430106          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  60 in total

1.  Protein hydrogen exchange mechanism: local fluctuations.

Authors:  Haripada Maity; Woon Ki Lim; Jon N Rumbley; S Walter Englander
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Atomistic Insight into Hydrogen Exchange Mass Spectrometry Experiments.

Authors:  Ariel A Petruk; Lucas A Defelipe; Ramiro G Rodríguez Limardo; Hernán Bucci; Marcelo A Marti; Adrian G Turjanski
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Quantitative assessment of protein structural models by comparison of H/D exchange MS data with exchange behavior accurately predicted by DXCOREX.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Dennis Pantazatos; Sheng Li; Yoshitomo Hamuro; Vincent J Hilser; Virgil L Woods
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 4.  Mechanisms and uses of hydrogen exchange.

Authors:  S W Englander; T R Sosnick; J J Englander; L Mayne
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  On the mechanism of isotope exchange kinetics of single protons in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor.

Authors:  B D Hilton; C K Woodward
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1979-12-25       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Measurement of solvent accessibility at protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Mandell; Abel Baerga-Ortiz; Arnold M Falick; Elizabeth A Komives
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2005

7.  How amide hydrogens exchange in native proteins.

Authors:  Filip Persson; Bertil Halle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  NMR-detected hydrogen exchange and molecular dynamics simulations provide structural insight into fibril formation of prion protein fragment 106-126.

Authors:  Kazuo Kuwata; Tomoharu Matumoto; Hong Cheng; Kuniaki Nagayama; Thomas L James; Heinrich Roder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Docking motif interactions in MAP kinases revealed by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Thomas Lee; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Yukihito Kabuyama; James Stroud; Xiaoshan Min; Elizabeth J Goldsmith; Lin Chen; Katheryn A Resing; Natalie G Ahn
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Applications of hydrogen/deuterium exchange MS from 2012 to 2014.

Authors:  Gregory F Pirrone; Roxana E Iacob; John R Engen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Successes and challenges in simulating the folding of large proteins.

Authors:  Anne Gershenson; Shachi Gosavi; Pietro Faccioli; Patrick L Wintrode
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins as drug targets: Progress and future potentials.

Authors:  Joseph B O'Brien; Joshua C Wilkinson; David L Roman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry Measurements of the Fab Fragment of NISTmAb.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Hudgens; Elyssia S Gallagher; Ioannis Karageorgos; Kyle W Anderson; James J Filliben; Richard Y-C Huang; Guodong Chen; George M Bou-Assaf; Alfonso Espada; Michael J Chalmers; Eduardo Harguindey; Hui-Min Zhang; Benjamin T Walters; Jennifer Zhang; John Venable; Caitlin Steckler; Inhee Park; Ansgar Brock; Xiaojun Lu; Ratnesh Pandey; Arun Chandramohan; Ganesh Srinivasan Anand; Sasidhar N Nirudodhi; Justin B Sperry; Jason C Rouse; James A Carroll; Kasper D Rand; Ulrike Leurs; David D Weis; Mohammed A Al-Naqshabandi; Tyler S Hageman; Daniel Deredge; Patrick L Wintrode; Malvina Papanastasiou; John D Lambris; Sheng Li; Sarah Urata
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Interplay of cysteine exposure and global protein dynamics in small-molecule recognition by a regulator of G-protein signaling protein.

Authors:  Mohammadjavad Mohammadi; Hossein Mohammadiarani; Vincent S Shaw; Richard R Neubig; Harish Vashisth
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2018-12-26

Review 6.  Advances in Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry and the Pursuit of Challenging Biological Systems.

Authors:  Ellie I James; Taylor A Murphree; Clint Vorauer; John R Engen; Miklos Guttman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 7.  Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook.

Authors:  Minh H Tran; Clara T Schoeder; Kevin L Schey; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.786

8.  An Interhelical Salt Bridge Controls Flexibility and Inhibitor Potency for Regulators of G-protein Signaling Proteins 4, 8, and 19.

Authors:  Vincent S Shaw; Mohammadjavad Mohammadi; Josiah A Quinn; Harish Vashisth; Richard R Neubig
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Dramatic Shape Changes Occur as Cytochrome c Folds.

Authors:  Serdal Kirmizialtin; Felicia Pitici; Alfredo E Cardenas; Ron Elber; D Thirumalai
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Interpretation of HDX Data by Maximum-Entropy Reweighting of Simulated Structural Ensembles.

Authors:  Richard T Bradshaw; Fabrizio Marinelli; José D Faraldo-Gómez; Lucy R Forrest
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.