Literature DB >> 31712314

Successes and challenges in simulating the folding of large proteins.

Anne Gershenson1,2, Shachi Gosavi3, Pietro Faccioli4,5, Patrick L Wintrode6.   

Abstract

Computational simulations of protein folding can be used to interpret experimental folding results, to design new folding experiments, and to test the effects of mutations and small molecules on folding. However, whereas major experimental and computational progress has been made in understanding how small proteins fold, research on larger, multidomain proteins, which comprise the majority of proteins, is less advanced. Specifically, large proteins often fold via long-lived partially folded intermediates, whose structures, potentially toxic oligomerization, and interactions with cellular chaperones remain poorly understood. Molecular dynamics based folding simulations that rely on knowledge of the native structure can provide critical, detailed information on folding free energy landscapes, intermediates, and pathways. Further, increases in computational power and methodological advances have made folding simulations of large proteins practical and valuable. Here, using serpins that inhibit proteases as an example, we review native-centric methods for simulating the folding of large proteins. These synergistic approaches range from Gō and related structure-based models that can predict the effects of the native structure on folding to all-atom-based methods that include side-chain chemistry and can predict how disease-associated mutations may impact folding. The application of these computational approaches to serpins and other large proteins highlights the successes and limitations of current computational methods and underscores how computational results can be used to inform experiments. These powerful simulation approaches in combination with experiments can provide unique insights into how large proteins fold and misfold, expanding our ability to predict and manipulate protein folding.
© 2020 Gershenson et al.

Keywords:  MD simulations; all-atom-based methods; computer modeling; molecular dynamics; multidomain proteins; native-centric simulations; protein folding; protein misfolding; serpin; structure-based model (SBM); tertiary structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31712314      PMCID: PMC6952611          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.006794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  159 in total

Review 1.  Capturing the essence of folding and functions of biomolecules using coarse-grained models.

Authors:  Changbong Hyeon; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Statistical mechanics of protein folding, unfolding and fluctuation.

Authors:  N Gło
Journal:  Adv Biophys       Date:  1976

3.  Simulations of thermodynamics and kinetics on rough energy landscapes with milestoning.

Authors:  Juan M Bello-Rivas; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Interactions causing the kinetic trap in serpin protein folding.

Authors:  Hana Im; Mi-Sook Woo; Kwang Yeon Hwang; Myeong-Hee Yu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Folding pathway of a multidomain protein depends on its topology of domain connectivity.

Authors:  Takashi Inanami; Tomoki P Terada; Masaki Sasai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Protein Quality Control in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Tatyana Dubnikov; Tziona Ben-Gedalya; Ehud Cohen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Metastability of the folded states of globular proteins.

Authors:  J D Honeycutt; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: an analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  E Paci; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Diffusion, crowding & protein stability in a dynamic molecular model of the bacterial cytoplasm.

Authors:  Sean R McGuffee; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  The molecular and cellular pathology of α₁-antitrypsin deficiency.

Authors:  Bibek Gooptu; Jennifer A Dickens; David A Lomas
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 11.951

View more
  6 in total

1.  A CHO-Based Cell-Free Dual Fluorescence Reporter System for the Straightforward Assessment of Amber Suppression and scFv Functionality.

Authors:  Simon K Krebs; Nathanaël Rakotoarinoro; Marlitt Stech; Anne Zemella; Stefan Kubick
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  All-atom simulation of the HET-s prion replication.

Authors:  Luca Terruzzi; Giovanni Spagnolli; Alberto Boldrini; Jesús R Requena; Emiliano Biasini; Pietro Faccioli
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Granger Causality Analysis of Chignolin Folding.

Authors:  Marcin Sobieraj; Piotr Setny
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 4.  On the Effects of Disordered Tails, Supertertiary Structure and Quinary Interactions on the Folding and Function of Protein Domains.

Authors:  Francesca Malagrinò; Valeria Pennacchietti; Daniele Santorelli; Livia Pagano; Caterina Nardella; Awa Diop; Angelo Toto; Stefano Gianni
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-01-26

Review 5.  Deep learning-based molecular dynamics simulation for structure-based drug design against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Yao Sun; Yanqi Jiao; Chengcheng Shi; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 6.155

6.  Validation of DBFOLD: An efficient algorithm for computing folding pathways of complex proteins.

Authors:  Amir Bitran; William M Jacobs; Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.