Literature DB >> 30214089

Clinical significance of SUVmax on preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients who underwent R0-esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Daisuke Shimizu1, Norihiro Yuasa1, Hideo Miyake1, Eiji Takeuchi1, Kanji Miyata1, Shigeki Itoh2.   

Abstract

The standardized uptake value (SUV) is a marker of tumor glucose metabolism, detected using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and may reflect tumor aggressiveness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of maximum SUV (SUVmax) of primary esophageal cancer (EC) lesions. A total of 86 patients with EC who underwent pre-treatment FDG-PET and R0-resection were included in our study. The mean patient age was 65 years, and 87% were men. Histologically, cancers included squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, and other tumors in 72, 3, and 11 patients, respectively. Preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy was performed in 4 and 37 patients, respectively. Measured patient outcomes included the correlation between the SUVmax of the primary EC lesion and clinicopathological factors in patients who did not undergo preoperative treatment (n = 45), and the investigation of relapse-free survival (RFS) according to SUVmax and the relationship between SUVmax and recurrence sites in all patients (n=86). The mean SUVmax was 8.9 ± 4.6, and SUVmax values significantly correlated with tumor invasion depth and stage. The 5-year RFS for the enrolled patients was 57%, and the RFS of patients with SUVmax < 7.0 was better than that of patients with SUVmax ≥ 7.0, with a marginal difference (p = 0.0892). Lymph node recurrences were significantly more common in patients with SUVmax ≥ 7.0, compared to patients with SUVmax < 7.0. Therefore, the SUVmax value of the primary EC lesion before preoperative treatment may be predictive of RFS and lymph node recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; esophageal cancer; prognostic factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30214089      PMCID: PMC6125650          DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.80.3.401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  21 in total

1.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  P Flamen; A Lerut; E Van Cutsem; W De Wever; M Peeters; S Stroobants; P Dupont; G Bormans; M Hiele; P De Leyn; D Van Raemdonck; W Coosemans; N Ectors; K Haustermans; L Mortelmans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907).

Authors:  Nobutoshi Ando; Hoichi Kato; Hiroyasu Igaki; Masayuki Shinoda; Soji Ozawa; Hideaki Shimizu; Tsutomu Nakamura; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Norio Aoyama; Akira Kurita; Kenichiro Ikeda; Tatsuo Kanda; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Kenichi Nakamura; Haruhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kato; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Masanobu Nakajima; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Minako Yoshikawa; Hitoshi Ojima; Katsuhiko Tsukada; Noboru Oriuchi; Tomio Inoue; Keigo Endo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial.

Authors:  Bryan F Meyers; Robert J Downey; Paul A Decker; Robert J Keenan; Barry A Siegel; Robert J Cerfolio; Rodney J Landreneau; Carolyn E Reed; Dennis M Balfe; Farrokh Dehdashti; Karla V Ballman; Valerie W Rusch; Joe B Putnam
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography of esophageal cancer predicts stage, tumor biology, and survival.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Ayesha S Bryant
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Prognostic significance of SUV on PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; Ping Gu; Gang Huang; HuiPing Xue; ShuQi Wu
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.566

8.  The higher the decrease in the standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography after chemoradiation, the better the survival of patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Heta Javeri; Lianchun Xiao; Eric Rohren; Jeffrey H Lee; Zhongxing Liao; Wayne Hofstetter; Dipen Maru; Manoop S Bhutani; Stephen G Swisher; Homer Macapinlac; Xuemei Wang; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Positron emission tomographic scanning predicts survival after induction chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Port; Paul C Lee; Robert J Korst; Yaakov Liss; Danish Meherally; Paul Christos; Madhu Mazumdar; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Does the value of PET-CT extend beyond pretreatment staging? An analysis of survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Boris Sepesi; Daniel P Raymond; Marek Polomsky; Thomas J Watson; Virginia R Litle; Carolyn E Jones; Rui Hu; Xing Qiu; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predictive value of clinical and 18F-FDG-PET/CT derived imaging parameters in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lisa Marr; Bernhard Haller; Thomas Pyka; Jan C Peeken; Moritz Jesinghaus; Klemens Scheidhauer; Helmut Friess; Stephanie E Combs; Stefan Münch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The role of primary tumor SUVmax in the diagnosis of invasion depth: a step toward clinical T2N0 esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Dong Lin; Guobing Liu; Dongxian Jiang; Yangli Yu; Hao Wang; Hongcheng Shi; Lijie Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

3.  Geometrical Comparison and Quantitative Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT- and DW-MRI-Based Target Delineation Before and During Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Huimin Li; Jianbin Li; Fengxiang Li; Yingjie Zhang; Yankang Li; Yanluan Guo; Liang Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.