Literature DB >> 10986052

Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma.

P Flamen1, A Lerut, E Van Cutsem, W De Wever, M Peeters, S Stroobants, P Dupont, G Bormans, M Hiele, P De Leyn, D Van Raemdonck, W Coosemans, N Ectors, K Haustermans, L Mortelmans.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective study of preoperative tumor-node-metastasis staging of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) was designed to compare the accuracy of 18-F-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with conventional noninvasive modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-four patients with carcinomas of the esophagus (n = 43) or gastroesophageal junction (n = 31) were studied. All patients underwent attenuation-corrected FDG-PET imaging, a spiral computed tomography (CT) scan, and an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).
RESULTS: FDG-PET demonstrated increased activity in the primary tumor in 70 of 74 patients (sensitivity: 95%). False-negative PET images were found in four patients with T1 lesions. Thirty-four patients (46%) had stage IV disease. FDG-PET had a higher accuracy for diagnosing stage IV disease compared with the combination of CT and EUS (82% v 64%, respectively; P: =.004). FDG-PET had additional diagnostic value in 16 (22%) of 74 patients by upstaging 11 (15%) and downstaging five (7%) patients. Thirty-nine (53%) of the 74 patients underwent a 2- or 3-field lymphadenectomy in conjunction with primary curative esophagectomy. In these patients, tumoral involvement was found in 21 local and 35 regional or distant lymph nodes (LN). For local LN, the sensitivity of FDG-PET was lower than EUS (33% v 81%, respectively; P: =.027), but the specificity may have been higher (89% v 67%, respectively; P: = not significant [NS]). For the assessment of regional and distant LN involvement, compared with the combined use of CT and EUS, FDG-PET had a higher specificity (90% v 98%, respectively; P: =. 025) and a similar sensitivity (46% v 43%, respectively; P: = NS).
CONCLUSION: PET significantly improves the detection of stage IV disease in EC compared with the conventional staging modalities. PET improves diagnostic specificity for LN staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10986052     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  104 in total

1.  Inclusion of PET-CT into planning of primary or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of esophageal cancer improves prognosis.

Authors:  Jan-Christopher Metzger; Daniel Wollschläger; Matthias Miederer; Peter Vaupel; Markus Moehler; Heinz Schmidberger; Arnulf Mayer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  B B Chin; R L Wahl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Ji Wan Park; Brant W Hager; Malcolm V Brock; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A case of a superficial carcinoma of the esophagus with isolated lymph node metastasis around the abdominal aorta.

Authors:  Tomoya Hatakeyama; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Daisuke Ichikawa; Kazuma Okamoto; Shuhei Komatsu; Yasutoshi Murayama; Hisashi Ikoma; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Toshiya Ochiai; Yukihito Kokuba; Teruhisa Sonoyama; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  The role of integrated F-18-FDG-PET scanning in the detection of M1 disease in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Soumil Vyas; Sheraz R Markar; Lydia Iordanidou; Samantha Read; David Stoker; Majid Hashemi; Ian Mitchell; Mark Winslet; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Technological advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Milan Vosmik; Jiri Petera; Igor Sirak; Miroslav Hodek; Petr Paluska; Jiri Dolezal; Marcela Kopacova
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Value of sequential 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in prediction of the overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yimin Li; Qin Lin; Zuoming Luo; Long Zhao; Luchao Zhu; Long Sun; Hua Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  PET scans as a predictive marker of survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Minsig Choi; Sri Lakshmi S Kollepara; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.481

9.  Comparison of uptake characteristics and prognostic value of 201Tl and 18F-FDG in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Chung; Kyung-Han Lee; Eun Jeong Lee; Su Jin Lee; Young Seok Cho; Joon Young Choi; Young Mog Shim; Kwhanmien Kim; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  New approach to malignant strictures of the esophagus.

Authors:  Kulwinder S Dua
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.