| Literature DB >> 30212462 |
Piotr Palczynski1, Szymon Bialka1, Hanna Misiolek1, Maja Copik1, Anna Smelik1, Lukasz Szarpak2, Kurt Ruetzler3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Predicting difficult intubation is of high clinical interest.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30212462 PMCID: PMC6136707 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Diameter of a double lumen tube size: 37CH (left) and single lumen tube size: 8.0 I.D (right).
Fig 2Measurement of thyromental height using a depth gauge.
Fig 3CONSORT flow chart.
Demographic data of the patients and comparison of studied predictive factors depending on occurrence of difficult intubation.
Values are mean, standard deviation (SD) or number.
| Difficult intubation (n = 33) | Normal intubation (n = 167) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60 ± 8.4 | 61 ± 12 | 0.476 |
| Height (cm) | 174 ± 8 | 174 ± 7 | 0.147 |
| Weight (kg) | 95 ± 22.3 | 79.6 ±15 | |
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 31 ± 6 | 26 ± 5 | |
| Thyromental height; mm ± SD | 46 ± 10 | 54 ± 9 | |
| Thyromental distance; mm ± SD | 93 ± 21 | 95 ± 18 | 0.37 |
| Sternomental distance; mm ± SD | 172 ± 33 | 179 ± 23 | 0.85 |
| Mallampati scale; | 0.24 | ||
| I | 16 | 94 | |
| II | 7 | 52 | |
| III | 6 | 14 | |
| IV | 4 | 7 | |
| Cormack & Lehane classification; | |||
| I | 12 | 112 | |
| II | 7 | 43 | |
| III | 10 | 11 | |
| IV | 4 | 1 |
Logistic regression analysis revealed that only TMHT and Cormack-Lehane scale have significant impact on the occurrence of difficult intubation (Table 3, Fig 3). With every 1 mm increase in THMT, the risk of difficult intubation decreased by 7%. While the increase in Cormack—Lehane scale in 1 point is associated with a 3-fold increased risk of difficult intubation. Other factors, namely the thyromental distance, sternomental distance and Mallampati score turned out to be irrelevant to the occurrence of difficult intubation in developed statistical model.
Sensitivity and specificity parameters.
| Test | AUC | Sensivity | Specificy | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMHT | 0.573 | 70% | 70% | 17% | 85% |
| Thyromental distance | 0.623 | 50% | 36% | 24% | 93% |
| Sternomental distance | 0.535 | 60% | 41% | 19% | 87% |
| Circuit neck | 0.707 | 67% | 79% | 33% | 88% |
| Cormack-Lehane grade | 0.801 | 65% | 92% | 62% | 93% |
| Mallampati grade | 0.563 | 25% | 87% | 26% | 86% |
Simple linear regression analysis between TMHT height and thyromental height (R = 0.334, P<0.001) and between TMHT height and sternomental height (R = 0.129, P = 0.070) are presented in Fig 6.
Impact of studied factors on difficult intubation.
Values are odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
| OR | 95% CI | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increase in thyromental height test | 0.93 | 0.88–0.98 | 0.007 |
| Increase in Cormack & Lehane classification | 2.97 | 1.69–5.24 | 0.0001 |
| Decrease in thyromental distance | 1.46 | 0.95–2.26 | 0.086 |
| Decrease in sternomental distance | 0.88 | 0.68–1.13 | 0.31 |
| Increase in Mallampati scale | 1.3 | 0.77–2.18 | 0.32 |
Fig 4ROC curve for thyromental height test.
Fig 5Sensitivity and specificity graph for thyromental height test with a 50 mm cut-off value.
Fig 6Simple linear regression analysis between (6A) TMHT height and thyromental height and (6B) between TMHT height and sternomental height.