Literature DB >> 29189209

Temporal Trends in Difficult and Failed Tracheal Intubation in a Regional Community Anesthetic Practice.

Rebecca A Schroeder1, Richard Pollard, Ishwori Dhakal, Mary Cooter, Solomon Aronson, Katherine Grichnik, William Buhrman, Miklos D Kertai, Joseph P Mathew, Mark Stafford-Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When tracheal intubation is difficult or unachievable before surgery or during an emergent resuscitation, this is a critical safety event. Consensus algorithms and airway devices have been introduced in hopes of reducing such occurrences. However, evidence of improved safety in clinical practice related to their introduction is lacking. Therefore, we selected a large perioperative database spanning 2002 to 2015 to look for changes in annual rates of difficult and failed tracheal intubation.
METHODS: Difficult (more than three attempts) and failed (unsuccessful, requiring awakening or surgical tracheostomy) intubation rates in patients 18 yr and older were compared between the early and late periods (pre- vs. post-January 2009) and by annual rate join-point analysis. Primary findings from a large, urban hospital were compared with combined observations from 15 smaller facilities.
RESULTS: Analysis of 421,581 procedures identified fourfold reductions in both event rates between the early and late periods (difficult: 6.6 of 1,000 vs. 1.6 of 1,000, P < 0.0001; failed: 0.2 of 1,000 vs. 0.06 of 1,000, P < 0.0001), with join-point analysis identifying two significant change points (2006, P = 0.02; 2010, P = 0.03) including a pre-2006 stable period, a steep drop between 2006 and 2010, and gradual decline after 2010. Data from 15 affiliated practices (442,428 procedures) demonstrated similar reductions.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective assessment spanning 14 yr (2002 to 2015), difficult and failed intubation rates by skilled providers declined significantly at both an urban hospital and a network of smaller affiliated practices. Further investigations are required to validate these findings in other data sets and more clearly identify factors associated with their occurrence as clues to future airway management advancements. VISUAL ABSTRACT: An online visual overview is available for this article at http://links.lww.com/ALN/B635.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29189209     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  6 in total

1.  Management of Difficult Tracheal Intubation: A Closed Claims Analysis.

Authors:  Aaron M Joffe; Michael F Aziz; Karen L Posner; Laura V Duggan; Shawn L Mincer; Karen B Domino
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Airway Leads and Airway Response Teams: Improving Delivery of Safer Airway Management?

Authors:  Carolyn Smith; Alistair F McNarry
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  Thyromental height test as a new method for prediction of difficult intubation with double lumen tube.

Authors:  Piotr Palczynski; Szymon Bialka; Hanna Misiolek; Maja Copik; Anna Smelik; Lukasz Szarpak; Kurt Ruetzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Intubation difficulty scale contributors and time delay in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ting-Wei Kang; Jung-Der Wang; Yi-Seng Tsai; Chung-Ren Lin; Chia-Chih Alex Tseng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Analysis of endotracheal intubation-related judicial precedents in South Korea.

Authors:  Hye-Yeon Cho; SuHwan Shin; SangJin Lee; Susie Yoon; Ho-Jin Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.063

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.