Literature DB >> 19502026

Predicting difficult airways using the intubation difficulty scale: a study comparing obese and non-obese patients.

Ronit Lavi1, Dror Segal, Avishai Ziser.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare intubation difficulty in obese and non-obese patients by intubation difficulty scale (IDS), intubation duration measurement, and oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) levels.
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study.
SETTING: Operating room of a tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: 204 ASA physical status I, II, and III adult patients who underwent elective surgery with endotracheal intubation. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative airway parameters, intubation duration, IDS scores, and lowest SaO(2) during intubation were recorded. MAIN
RESULTS: IDS scores were higher in the obese group than the non-obese (2.29 +/- 0.45 and 1.26 +/- 0.2, respectively, P = 0.03). Intubation duration was 45.1 +/- 6 sec for obese versus 36.8 +/- 2.6 sec for the non-obese group (P = 0.20). The lowest SaO(2) recorded was 97%, with no difference noted between groups. Mallampati class >or=3 was found to positively predict intubation difficulty scores greater than 5.
CONCLUSIONS: Difficult intubation was more prevalent among obese than non-obese patients, but intubation duration and lowest SaO(2) levels during intubation were not. Moreover, the modified Mallampati test was found to be a moderately good (60%) predictor of difficult intubation among obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19502026     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  12 in total

1.  Does Body Mass Index Reduction by Bariatric Surgery Affect Laryngoscopy Difficulty During Subsequent Anesthesia?

Authors:  Mordechai Shimonov; Pinhas Schechter; Mona Boaz; Ronen Waintrob; Tiberiu Ezri
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Difficult Tracheal Intubation in Obese Gastric Bypass patients.

Authors:  Niclas Dohrn; Thorbjørn Sommer; Jannie Bisgaard; Ebbe Rønholm; Jens Fromholt Larsen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  [Perioperative adverse respiratory events in overweight and obese children].

Authors:  J Ulrici; G Hempel; M Sasse; J Vollrath; C Höhne
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Predictors of difficult intubation defined by the intubation difficulty scale (IDS): predictive value of 7 airway assessment factors.

Authors:  Suk-Hwan Seo; Jeong-Gil Lee; Soo-Bong Yu; Doo-Sik Kim; Sie-Jeong Ryu; Kyung-Han Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-12-14

5.  Distance between Anterior Commissure and the First Tracheal Ring: An Important New Clinical Laryngotracheal Measurement.

Authors:  Ehsan Khadivi; Mohammad Ali Zaringhalam; Kamran Khazaeni; Mehdi Bakhshaee
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05

6.  BMI as a Predictor for Potential Difficult Tracheal Intubation in Males.

Authors:  Alberto A Uribe; David A Zvara; Erika G Puente; Andrew J Otey; Jianying Zhang; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-06-04

7.  Comparing ease of intubation in obese and lean patients using intubation difficulty scale.

Authors:  S Shailaja; S M Nichelle; A Kishan Shetty; B Radhesh Hegde
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2014 May-Aug

8.  Thyromental height test as a new method for prediction of difficult intubation with double lumen tube.

Authors:  Piotr Palczynski; Szymon Bialka; Hanna Misiolek; Maja Copik; Anna Smelik; Lukasz Szarpak; Kurt Ruetzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Crashing Obese Patient.

Authors:  Brian K Parker; Sara Manning; Michael E Winters
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-06

10.  The association of body mass index with difficult tracheal intubation management by direct laryngoscopy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Shen Sun; Shaoqiang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.