Kurt Ruetzler1, Sandra Esther Guzzella, David Werner Tscholl, Tanja Restin, Marco Cribari, Alparslan Turan, Jing You, Daniel I Sessler, Burkhardt Seifert, Tomasz Gaszynski, Michael T Ganter, Donat R Spahn. 1. From the Departments of OUTCOMES RESEARCH (K.R., A.T., D.I.S.) and General Anesthesiology (K.R.), Anesthesiology Institute, and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (J.Y.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Institute of Anesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (K.R., D.W.T., T.R., D.R.S.); Department of Anesthesia and Pain Therapy, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland (S.E.G., D.W.T., M.C., M.T.G.); Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (B.S.); and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland (T.G.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Supraglottic airway devices commonly are used for securing the airway during general anesthesia. Occasionally, intubation with an endotracheal tube through a supraglottic airway is indicated. Reported success rates for blind intubation range from 15 to 97%. The authors thus investigated as their primary outcome the fraction of patients who could be intubated blindly with an Air-Qsp supraglottic airway device (Mercury Medical, USA). Second, the authors investigated the influence of muscle relaxation on air leakage pressure, predictors for failed blind intubation, and associated complications of using the supraglottic airway device. METHODS: The authors enrolled 1,000 adults having elective surgery with endotracheal intubation. After routine induction of general anesthesia, a supraglottic airway device was inserted and patients were ventilated intermittently. Air leak pressure was measured before and after full muscle relaxation. Up to two blind intubation attempts were performed. RESULTS: The supraglottic airway provided adequate ventilation and oxygenation in 99% of cases. Blind intubation succeeded in 78% of all patients (95% CI, 75 to 81%). However, the success rate was inconsistent among the three centers (P < 0.001): 80% (95% CI, 75 to 85%) at the Institute of Anesthesia and Pain Therapy, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland; 41% (95% CI, 29 to 53%) at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland; and 84% (95% CI, 80 to 88%) at the Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Leak pressure before relaxation correlated reasonably well with air leak pressure after relaxation. CONCLUSIONS: The supraglottic airway device reliably provided a good airway and allowed blind intubation in nearly 80% of patients. It is thus a reasonable initial approach to airway control. Muscle relaxation can be used safely when unparalyzed leak pressure is adequate.
BACKGROUND: Supraglottic airway devices commonly are used for securing the airway during general anesthesia. Occasionally, intubation with an endotracheal tube through a supraglottic airway is indicated. Reported success rates for blind intubation range from 15 to 97%. The authors thus investigated as their primary outcome the fraction of patients who could be intubated blindly with an Air-Qsp supraglottic airway device (Mercury Medical, USA). Second, the authors investigated the influence of muscle relaxation on air leakage pressure, predictors for failed blind intubation, and associated complications of using the supraglottic airway device. METHODS: The authors enrolled 1,000 adults having elective surgery with endotracheal intubation. After routine induction of general anesthesia, a supraglottic airway device was inserted and patients were ventilated intermittently. Air leak pressure was measured before and after full muscle relaxation. Up to two blind intubation attempts were performed. RESULTS: The supraglottic airway provided adequate ventilation and oxygenation in 99% of cases. Blind intubation succeeded in 78% of all patients (95% CI, 75 to 81%). However, the success rate was inconsistent among the three centers (P < 0.001): 80% (95% CI, 75 to 85%) at the Institute of Anesthesia and Pain Therapy, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland; 41% (95% CI, 29 to 53%) at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland; and 84% (95% CI, 80 to 88%) at the Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Leak pressure before relaxation correlated reasonably well with air leak pressure after relaxation. CONCLUSIONS: The supraglottic airway device reliably provided a good airway and allowed blind intubation in nearly 80% of patients. It is thus a reasonable initial approach to airway control. Muscle relaxation can be used safely when unparalyzed leak pressure is adequate.
Authors: Piotr Palczynski; Szymon Bialka; Hanna Misiolek; Maja Copik; Anna Smelik; Lukasz Szarpak; Kurt Ruetzler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kurt Ruetzler; Jacek Smereka; Cristian Abelairas-Gomez; Michael Frass; Marek Dabrowski; Szymon Bialka; Hanna Misiolek; Tadeusz Plusa; Oliver Robak; Olga Aniolek; Jerzy Robert Ladny; Damian Gorczyca; Sanchit Ahuja; Lukasz Szarpak Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Maciej Maslanka; Lukasz Szarpak; Sanchit Ahuja; Kurt Ruetzler; Jacek Smereka Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Andrzej Bielski; Eva Rivas; Kurt Ruetzler; Jacek Smereka; Mateusz Puslecki; Marek Dabrowski; Jerzy R Ladny; Michael Frass; Oliver Robak; Togay Evrin; Lukasz Szarpak Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak; Jacek Smereka; Marek Dabrowski; Szymon Bialka; Lauretta Mosteller; Agnieszka Szarpak; Kobi Ludwin; Marzena Wojewodzka-Zelezniakowicz; Jerzy Robert Ladny Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 3.411