Literature DB >> 30209184

Clinical and Analytical Evaluation of the Anyplex II HPV HR Detection Assay within the VALGENT-3 Framework.

Anja Oštrbenk1, Lan Xu2, Marc Arbyn2, Mario Poljak3.   

Abstract

In 2012, VALidation of human papillomavirus (HPV) GENotyping Tests (VALGENT) was initiated to provide a formalized and uniform study framework for comparison and validation of HPV assays with genotyping capability. In VALGENT-3, the clinical and analytical performance of Anyplex II HPV HR detection (Anyplex) was compared to that of the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA test (hc2) and the cobas 4800 HPV test (cobas). The panel comprises 1,300 stored samples that were obtained from women 25 to 64 years old who participated in the Slovenian cancer screening program, enriched with 300 samples from women with abnormal cervical cytology. The sensitivity and specificity of Anyplex were noninferior to those of hc2, with a relative sensitivity of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.04) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.06) for CIN3+ and relative specificity of 1.02 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03) for a CIN grade of ≤1. The clinical sensitivity of Anyplex for CIN2+ and CIN3+ was comparable to that of hc2 (P values for McNemar test [p McN] of 0.655 and 0.564, respectively), but its specificity was significantly higher (p McN = 0.008). The sensitivity and specificity of Anyplex were also noninferior to those of cobas, with relative sensitivity of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.04) for CIN2+ and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.04) for CIN3+ and relative specificity of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.01) (p McN value of >0.05 in all cases). Regardless of the clinical outcome (CIN2+ or CIN3+), age restriction (women ≥30 years old), or comparator test used, Anyplex consistently showed excellent clinical performance and can be considered validated for primary cervical cancer screening.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anyplex; Hybrid Capture 2; VALGENT; analytical evaluation; cervical cancer screening; clinical validation; cobas; human papillomavirus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30209184      PMCID: PMC6204677          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01176-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  45 in total

1.  Evaluation of 14 triage strategies for HPV DNA-positive women in population-based cervical screening.

Authors:  Dorien C Rijkaart; Johannes Berkhof; Folkert J van Kemenade; Veerle M H Coupe; Albertus T Hesselink; Lawrence Rozendaal; Danielle A M Heideman; Ren H Verheijen; Saskia Bulk; Wim M Verweij; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Evaluation of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for the triage of women with high-risk HPV+ cytology-negative results.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; Mark H Stoler; Abha Sharma; Guili Zhang; Catherine Behrens; Teresa L Wright
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Primary human papillomavirus DNA screening for cervical cancer prevention: Can the screening interval be safely extended?

Authors:  Margaretha A Vink; Johannes A Bogaards; Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Anyplex II HPV28 detection and Anyplex II HPV HR detection assays are highly concordant with other commercial assays for detection of high-risk HPV genotypes in women with high grade cervical abnormalities.

Authors:  A M Cornall; M Poljak; S M Garland; S Phillips; J H Tan; D A Machalek; M A Quinn; S N Tabrizi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in The European Union Member States-Summary results from the second European screening report.

Authors:  Partha Basu; Antonio Ponti; Ahti Anttila; Guglielmo Ronco; Carlo Senore; Diama Bhadra Vale; Nereo Segnan; Mariano Tomatis; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Maja Primic Žakelj; Joakim Dillner; Klara Miriam Elfström; Stefan Lönnberg; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Assessment of the Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test within the VALGENT framework.

Authors:  Lan Xu; Anja Oštrbenk; Mario Poljak; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 7.  The role of human papillomavirus testing in cervical screening.

Authors:  Kate S Cuschieri; Heather A Cubie
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 8.  History of the use of HPV testing in cervical screening and in the management of abnormal cervical screening results.

Authors:  J Thomas Cox
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.168

9.  Comparing the performance of six human papillomavirus tests in a screening population.

Authors:  J Cuzick; L Cadman; D Mesher; J Austin; L Ashdown-Barr; L Ho; G Terry; S Liddle; C Wright; D Lyons; A Szarewski
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Need for expanded HPV genotyping for cervical screening.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Cosette Wheeler
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2016-06-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation and Optimization of the Clinical Accuracy of Hybribio's 14 High-Risk HPV with 16/18 Genotyping Assay within the VALGENT-3 Framework.

Authors:  Lan Xu; Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak; Mario Poljak; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Alinity m HR HPV Assay Fulfills Criteria for Human Papillomavirus Test Requirements in Cervical Cancer Screening Settings.

Authors:  Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak; Anja Šterbenc; Katja Seme; Mario Poljak
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Human papillomavirus genotype concordance between Anyplex II HPV28 and linear array HPV genotyping test in anogenital samples.

Authors:  François Coutlée; Alexandra de Pokomandy; Ann N Burchell; Mariam El-Zein; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Sophie Rodrigues-Coutlée; Deborah Money; Émilie Comète; Elisabeth McClymont; Danielle Rouleau; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 20.693

4.  Clinical performance of Anyplex II HPV28 by human papillomavirus type and viral load in a referral population.

Authors:  Ingrid Baasland; Pål R Romundstad; Maj Liv Eide; Christine M Jonassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clinical and Analytical Performance of the BD Onclarity HPV Assay with SurePath Screening Samples from the Danish Cervical Screening Program Using the VALGENT Framework.

Authors:  Jesper Hansen Bonde; Helle Pedersen; Wim Quint; Lan Xu; Marc Arbyn; Ditte Møller Ejegod
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Characterization and Diversity of 243 Complete Human Papillomavirus Genomes in Cervical Swabs Using Next Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Ardashel Latsuzbaia; Anke Wienecke-Baldacchino; Jessica Tapp; Marc Arbyn; Irma Karabegović; Zigui Chen; Marc Fischer; Friedrich Mühlschlegel; Steven Weyers; Pascale Pesch; Joël Mossong
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.