Literature DB >> 31666369

Alinity m HR HPV Assay Fulfills Criteria for Human Papillomavirus Test Requirements in Cervical Cancer Screening Settings.

Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak1, Anja Šterbenc1, Katja Seme1, Mario Poljak2.   

Abstract

The Alinity m HR HPV assay (Alinity) is a novel human papillomavirus (HPV) assay that individually identifies genotypes HPV16, HPV18, and HPV45 while reporting on 11 other high-risk HPV (hrHPV) genotypes in two aggregates: HPV31/33/52/58 and HPV35/39/51/56/59/66/68. The clinical performance of Alinity for screening for cervical cancer was evaluated in population-based settings. For women aged ≥30 years, the clinical sensitivity (n = 68) and specificity (n = 3,077) for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) of Alinity were 100.0% and 92.4%, respectively, and were not inferior to those of the Qiagen Digene Hybrid Capture 2 high-risk HPV DNA assay (hc2) (P = 0.0006 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The intralaboratory reproducibility and interlaboratory agreement of Alinity were 96.7% (kappa, 0.92) and 98.7% (kappa, 0.97), respectively. In the group ≥30 years of age, women who were baseline hrHPV negative had a lower risk for CIN2+ at 3 years using Alinity (0.04%) than those with a normal baseline cytology (0.65%) and had a risk comparable to that determined by the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay (0.04%), hc2 (0.08%), or the Roche Cobas 4800 HPV assay (0.04%). High-risk HPV16/18 infection was associated with a significantly higher baseline and 3-year CIN2+ and CIN3+ risk than the absence of HPV16/18 or the presence of hrHPVs at the baseline (all P values were <0.05). The baseline CIN2+ risk was 8.8% for those with HPV31/33/52/58 infection and 2.5% for those with HPV35/39/51/56/59/66/68 infection, while the 3-year CIN2+ risk was 17.0% and 4.9%, respectively (relative risk, 3.4 [P = 0.03] and 3.5 [P = 0.003], respectively), suggesting that extended genotyping by Alinity may be valuable in improving patient risk stratification. Alinity fulfills international consensus guideline criteria for primary cervical cancer screening and can be considered clinically validated, demonstrating safety comparable to that of other clinically validated HPV tests.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alinity HPV; HPV assay; HPV primary screening; cervical cancer; genotyping; hc2; human papillomavirus; validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31666369      PMCID: PMC6935899          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01120-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  36 in total

1.  Human papillomavirus oncogenic mRNA testing for cervical cancer screening: baseline and longitudinal results from the CLEAR study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reid; Thomas C Wright; Mark H Stoler; Jack Cuzick; Philip E Castle; Janel Dockter; Damon Getman; Cristina Giachetti
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Monitoring HPV vaccination.

Authors:  Margaret Stanley; Luisa Lina Villa
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Which high-risk HPV assays fulfil criteria for use in primary cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  M Arbyn; P J F Snijders; C J L M Meijer; J Berkhof; K Cuschieri; B J Kocjan; M Poljak
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Using the VALGENT-3 framework to assess the clinical and analytical performance of the RIATOL qPCR HPV genotyping assay.

Authors:  I Benoy; L Xu; D Vanden Broeck; M Poljak; A Oštrbenk Valenčak; M Arbyn; J Bogers
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  Cervical cancers associated with human papillomavirus types 16, 18 and 45 are diagnosed in younger women than cancers associated with other types: a cross-sectional observational study in Wales and Scotland (UK).

Authors:  Ned Powell; Kate Cuschieri; Heather Cubie; Sam Hibbitts; Dominique Rosillon; Sabrina Collas De Souza; Anco Molijn; Wim Quint; Katsiaryna Holl; Alison Fiander
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Maaike G Dijkstra; Marjolein van Zummeren; Lawrence Rozendaal; Folkert J van Kemenade; Theo J M Helmerhorst; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-10-04

7.  Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence.

Authors:  Susanne K Kjær; Kirsten Frederiksen; Christian Munk; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  The role of human papillomavirus testing in cervical screening.

Authors:  Kate S Cuschieri; Heather A Cubie
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.168

9.  High-risk HPV detection and concurrent HPV 16 and 18 typing with Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test.

Authors:  Ning Tang; Shihai Huang; Brian Erickson; Wai-Bing Mak; John Salituro; John Robinson; Klara Abravaya
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 10.  VALGENT: A protocol for clinical validation of human papillomavirus assays.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Christophe Depuydt; Ina Benoy; Johannes Bogers; Kate Cuschieri; Markus Schmitt; Michael Pawlita; Daan Geraets; Isabelle Heard; Tarik Gheit; Massimo Tommasino; Mario Poljak; Jesper Bonde; Wim Quint
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.168

View more
  2 in total

1.  Real-life head-to-head comparison of performance of two high-throughput automated assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal swabs: the Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 and cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 assays.

Authors:  Rok Kogoj; Petra Kmetič; Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak; Kristina Fujs Komloš; Katja Seme; Martin Sagadin; Miša Korva; Mario Poljak
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Clinical Validation of the Onclarity Assay After Assay Migration to the High-Throughput COR Instrument Using SurePath Screening Samples From the Danish Cervical Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Ditte Møller Ejegod; Helle Pedersen; Birgitte Tønnes Pedersen; Christine Monceyron Jonassen; Agnes Kathrine Lie; Laila Solhaug Hulleberg; Marc Arbyn; Jesper Bonde
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.493

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.