Literature DB >> 21400507

Evaluation of 14 triage strategies for HPV DNA-positive women in population-based cervical screening.

Dorien C Rijkaart1, Johannes Berkhof, Folkert J van Kemenade, Veerle M H Coupe, Albertus T Hesselink, Lawrence Rozendaal, Danielle A M Heideman, Ren H Verheijen, Saskia Bulk, Wim M Verweij, Peter J F Snijders, Chris J L M Meijer.   

Abstract

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing has a higher sensitivity but lower specificity than cytology for detection of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). To avoid over-referral to colposcopy and overtreatment, hrHPV-positive women require triage testing and/or followup. A total of 25,658 women (30-60 years) enrolled in a population-based cohort study had an adequate baseline Pap smear and hrHPV test. The end-point was cumulative two-year risk of CIN grade 3 or worse (CIN3+). In a post-hoc analysis, fourteen triage/followup strategies for hrHPV-positive women (n = 1,303) were evaluated for colposcopy referral rate, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Five strategies involved triage testing without a repeat test and nine strategies involved triage testing followed by one repeat testing. The tests were cytology, hrHPV, HPV16/18 genotyping and HPV16/18/31/33/45 genotyping. Results were adjusted for women in the cohort study who did not attend repeat testing. Of the strategies without repeat testing, combined cytology and HPV16/18/31/33/45 genotyping gave the highest NPV of 98.9% (95%CI 97.6-99.5%). The corresponding colposcopy referral rate was 58.1% (95%CI 55.4-60.8%). Eight of the nine strategies with retesting had an estimated NPV of at least 98%. Of those, cytology triage followed by cytology at 12 months had a markedly lower colposcopy referral rate of 33.4% (95%CI 30.2-36.7%) than the other strategies. The NPV of the latter strategy was 99.3% (95%CI 98.1-99.8%). Triage hrHPV-positive women with cytology, followed by repeat cytology testing yielded a high NPV and modest colposcopy referral rate and appear to be the most feasible management strategy.
Copyright © 2011 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21400507     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  55 in total

1.  A Suggested Approach to Simplify and Improve Cervical Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Clinical validation of the cobas 4800 HPV test for cervical screening purposes.

Authors:  D A M Heideman; A T Hesselink; J Berkhof; F van Kemenade; W J G Melchers; N Fransen Daalmeijer; M Verkuijten; C J L M Meijer; P J F Snijders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

4.  Screening: Cervical cancer--should we abandon cytology for screening?

Authors:  Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Clinical validation of a type-specific real-time quantitative human papillomavirus PCR against the performance of hybrid capture 2 for the purpose of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  C E Depuydt; I H Benoy; J F A Beert; A M Criel; J J Bogers; M Arbyn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Long-term stability of human genomic and human papillomavirus DNA stored in BD SurePath and Hologic PreservCyt liquid-based cytology media.

Authors:  Patricia M Agreda; Gerard H Beitman; Erin C Gutierrez; James M Harris; Kristopher R Koch; William D LaViers; Sharon V Leitch; Courtney E Maus; Ray A McMillian; William A Nussbaumer; Marcus L R Palmer; Michael J Porter; Gregory A Richart; Ryan J Schwab; Laurence M Vaughan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Molecular tests potentially improving HPV screening and genotyping for cervical cancer prevention.

Authors:  Ana Gradíssimo; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 5.225

8.  p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in a HPV-positive gynecologic outpatient population.

Authors:  Roosmarijn Luttmer; Maaike G Dijkstra; Peter J F Snijders; Johannes Berkhof; Folkert J van Kemenade; Lawrence Rozendaal; Theo J M Helmerhorst; René H M Verheijen; W Abraham Ter Harmsel; W Marchien van Baal; Peppino G C M Graziosi; Wim G V Quint; Johan W M Spruijt; Dorenda K E van Dijken; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  A study of genotyping for management of human papillomavirus-positive, cytology-negative cervical screening results.

Authors:  M Schiffman; R D Burk; S Boyle; T Raine-Bennett; H A Katki; J C Gage; N Wentzensen; J R Kornegay; C Aldrich; T Tam; H Erlich; R Apple; B Befano; P E Castle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Laser-assisted rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry (LA-REIMS) as a metabolomics platform in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Maria Paraskevaidi; Simon J S Cameron; Eilbhe Whelan; Sarah Bowden; Menelaos Tzafetas; Anita Mitra; Anita Semertzidou; Antonis Athanasiou; Phillip R Bennett; David A MacIntyre; Zoltan Takats; Maria Kyrgiou
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.