Literature DB >> 25484263

Primary human papillomavirus DNA screening for cervical cancer prevention: Can the screening interval be safely extended?

Margaretha A Vink1,2, Johannes A Bogaards1, Chris J L M Meijer3, Johannes Berkhof2.   

Abstract

Cytological screening has substantially decreased the cervical cancer incidence, but even better protection may be achieved by primary high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) screening. In the Netherlands, five-yearly cytological screening for women aged 30-60 years will be replaced by primary hrHPV screening in 2016. The new screening guidelines involve an extension of the screening interval from 5 to 10 years for hrHPV-negative women aged 40 or 50 years. We investigated the impact of this program change on the lifetime cancer risks in women without an hrHPV infection at age 30, 35, 40, 45 or 50 years. The time to cancer was estimated using 14-year follow-up data from a population-based screening intervention trial and the nationwide database of histopathology reports. The new screening guidelines are expected to lead to a reduced cervical cancer risk for all age groups. The average risk reduction was 34% and was smallest (25%) among women aged 35 years. The impact of hrHPV screening on the cancer risk was sensitive to the duration from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 (CIN2/3) to cancer; a small increase in the cancer risk was estimated for women aged 35 or 40 years in case a substantial proportion of CIN2/3 showed fast progression to cancer. Our results indicate that primary hrHPV screening with a ten-yearly interval for hrHPV-negative women of age 40 and beyond will lead to a further reduction in lifetime cancer risk compared to five-yearly cytology, provided that precancerous lesions progress slowly to cancer.
© 2014 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; human papillomavirus DNA test; mass screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25484263     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  8 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of women with minor cervical lesions: Revisiting the application of HPV DNA testing.

Authors:  Kine Pedersen; Emily A Burger; Stephen Sy; Ivar S Kristiansen; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Clinical and Analytical Evaluation of the Anyplex II HPV HR Detection Assay within the VALGENT-3 Framework.

Authors:  Anja Oštrbenk; Lan Xu; Marc Arbyn; Mario Poljak
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Prediction of cervical cancer incidence in England, UK, up to 2040, under four scenarios: a modelling study.

Authors:  Alejandra Castanon; Rebecca Landy; Francesca Pesola; Peter Windridge; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2017-12-19

4.  Development of high-throughput genotyping method of all 18 HR HPV based on the MALDI-TOF MS platform and compared with the Roche Cobas 4800 HPV assay using clinical specimens.

Authors:  Xushan Cai; Qinghua Guan; Yu Huan; Ziyu Liu; Jiehua Qi; Shichao Ge
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Clinical performance of the Roche Cobas 4800 HPV test for primary cervical cancer screening in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Stephanie S Liu; Karen K L Chan; Tina N Wei; Ka Yu Tse; Siew F Ngu; Mandy M Y Chu; Lesley S K Lau; Annie N Y Cheung; Hextan Y S Ngan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Comparison of the Roche cobas® 4800 and Digene Hybrid Capture® 2 HPV tests for primary cervical cancer screening in the HPV FOCAL trial.

Authors:  Darrel A Cook; Wendy Mei; Laurie W Smith; Dirk J van Niekerk; Kathy Ceballos; Eduardo L Franco; Andrew J Coldman; Gina S Ogilvie; Mel Krajden
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  The potential harms of primary human papillomavirus screening in over-screened women: a microsimulation study.

Authors:  Steffie K Naber; Inge M C M de Kok; Suzette M Matthijsse; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  What cervical screening is appropriate for women who have been vaccinated against high risk HPV? A simulation study.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Peter Windridge; Matthew S Gillman; Peter D Sasieni
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 7.396

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.