Literature DB >> 24980079

"It's all very well reading the letters in the genome, but it's a long way to being able to write": Men's interpretations of undergoing genetic profiling to determine future risk of prostate cancer.

Elizabeth K Bancroft1, Elena Castro, Audrey Ardern-Jones, Clare Moynihan, Elizabeth Page, Natalie Taylor, Rosalind A Eeles, Emma Rowley, Karen Cox.   

Abstract

A family history of prostate cancer (PC) is one of the main risk factors for the disease. A number of common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that confer small but cumulatively substantial risks of PC have been identified, opening the possibility for the use of SNPs in PC risk stratification for targeted screening and prevention in the future. The objective of this study was to explore the psychosocial impact of receiving information about genetic risk of PC. The participants were men who had a family history of PC and were enrolled in a screening study providing research genetic profiling alongside screening for PC. A combination of questionnaires and in-depth interviews were used. Questionnaires were completed by men at two time points: both before and after joining the study and going through the genetic profiling process. The interviews were completed after all study process were complete and were analysed using a framework analysis. In total 95 men completed both questionnaires and 26 men were interviewed. A number of issues facing men at risk of PC were identified. The results fell into two main categories: personal relevance and societal relevance. The strength of men's innate beliefs about their risk, shaped by genetic and environmental assumptions, outweigh the information provided by genetic testing. Men felt genetic profile results would have future use for accessing prostate screening, being aware of symptoms and in communicating with others. The findings reinforce the importance of providing contextual information alongside genetic profiling test results, and emphasises the importance of the counselling process in providing genetic risk information. This research raises some key issues to facilitate clinical practice and future research related to the use of genetic profiling to determine risk of PC and other diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980079     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9734-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  31 in total

1.  Using the common sense model to understand perceived cancer risk in individuals testing for BRCA1/2 mutations.

Authors:  Kimberly Kelly; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski; Deborah Toppmeyer; Judy Much; James Dermody; Monica Marvin; Jill Baran; Marvin Schwalb
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?

Authors:  David J Hunter; Muin J Khoury; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health.

Authors:  W H Courtenay
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Models of genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  A C Antoniou; D F Easton
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Psychological impact of genetic testing in women from high-risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; A Barratt; V Schnieden; M Watson; J Brown; K Tucker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Targeted screening for prostate cancer in high risk families: early onset is a significant risk factor for disease in first degree relatives.

Authors:  Antoine Valeri; Luc Cormier; Marie-Pierre Moineau; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Rahmene Azzouzi; Laurent Doucet; Francoise Baschet; Isabelle Cussenot; Joel L'Her; Philippe Berthon; Philippe Mangin; Olivier Cussenot; Jean-Francois Morin; Geroges Fournier
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Screening for prostate cancer in high risk populations.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jo Ann V Antenor; Kimberly A Roehl; Judd W Moul
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  The genetic epidemiology of prostate cancer and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Rosalind Eeles; Chee Goh; Elena Castro; Elizabeth Bancroft; Michelle Guy; Ali Amin Al Olama; Douglas Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 14.432

View more
  6 in total

1.  Understanding of multigene test results among males undergoing germline testing for inherited prostate cancer: Implications for genetic counseling.

Authors:  Veda N Giri; Elias Obeid; Sarah E Hegarty; Laura Gross; Lisa Bealin; Colette Hyatt; Carolyn Y Fang; Amy Leader
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of genomic testing in cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tatiane Yanes; Amanda M Willis; Bettina Meiser; Katherine M Tucker; Megan Best
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The Genetic Education for Men (GEM) Trial: Development of Web-Based Education for Untested Men in BRCA1/2-Positive Families.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Mary Kate Ladd; Claudine Isaacs; Hannah Segal; Aryana Jacobs; Kathryn L Taylor; Kristi D Graves; Suzanne C O'Neill; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Ambiguity in a masculine world: Being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier and a man with prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Moynihan; E K Bancroft; A Mitra; A Ardern-Jones; E Castro; E C Page; R A Eeles
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Impute.me: An Open-Source, Non-profit Tool for Using Data From Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing to Calculate and Interpret Polygenic Risk Scores.

Authors:  Lasse Folkersen; Oliver Pain; Andrés Ingason; Thomas Werge; Cathryn M Lewis; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Online accounts of gene expression profiling in early-stage breast cancer: Interpreting genomic testing for chemotherapy decision making.

Authors:  Emily Ross; Julia Swallow; Anne Kerr; Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.377

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.