| Literature DB >> 30200543 |
Laura Inés Elvira-Torales1,2, Inmaculada Navarro-González3, Rocío González-Barrio4, Gala Martín-Pozuelo5, Guillermo Doménech6, Juan Seva7, Javier García-Alonso8, María Jesús Periago-Castón9.
Abstract
The objective of this work was to identify the effect of tomato juice on the expression of genes and levels of metabolites related to steatosis in rats. Male Sprague Dawley rats (8 weeks-old) were grouped (6 rats/group) in four experimental groups: NA (normal diet and water), NL (normal diet and tomato juice), HA (high-fat diet and water), and HL (high-fat diet and tomato juice). After an intervention period of 5 weeks, rats were sacrificed and biochemical parameters, biomarkers of oxidative stress, liver metabolites, and gene expression were determined. Although the H diet provoked dislipemia related to steatosis, no changes in isoprostanes or liver malondialdehyde (MDA) were observed. Changes in the gene expression of the HA group were produced by the high consumption of fat, whereas the consumption of tomato juice had different effects, depending on the diet. In the NL group, the genes involved in β-oxidation were upregulated, and in groups NL and HL upregulation of CD36 and downregulation of APOB and LPL were observed. In addition, in the HL group the accumulation of lycopene upregulated the genes FXR and HNF4A, which have been suggested as preventive factors in relation to steatosis. Regarding the metabolomics study, intake of tomato juice stimulated the biosynthesis of glutathione and amino acids of the transulfurization pathway, increasing the levels of metabolites related to the antioxidant response.Entities:
Keywords: gene expression; lycopene; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); oxidative biomarkers; quantitative metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30200543 PMCID: PMC6165399 DOI: 10.3390/nu10091215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Food and drink intake, excreted feces and urine, lycopene intake, and apparent lycopene absorption of animals of the four experimental groups, in the 5-week intervention period.1
| Parameters | NA | NL | HA | HL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 428 ± 75 a | 432 ± 47 a | 375 ± 18 b | 406 ± 20 b |
| Final body weight (g) | 494 ± 65 | 496 ± 70 | 471 ± 20 | 489 ± 25 |
| Body weight increase (%) | 15.4 | 14.7 | 25.6 | 20.1 |
| Food intake (g/day) | 20 ± 2.6 a | 17.8 ± 1.8 b | 13.1 ±1.9 c | 12.0 ± 4.6 c |
| Food intake (kcal/day) * | 58 | 52 | 59 | 54 |
| Tomato juice or water intake (mL/day) | 25.8 ± 4.3 c | 63.6 ± 13.3 a | 44.3 ± 12.2 b | 78.8 ± 12.6 a |
| Drinks intake (kcal/day) ** | 0 | 16 | 0 | 20 |
| Total intake (kcal/day) | 58 | 68 | 59 | 74 |
| Excreted feces (g/day) | 10.8 ± 1.2 a | 10.3 ± 0.9 a | 2.3 ± 1.4 b | 3.9 ± 1.3 b |
| Excreted urine (mL/day) | 12.2 ± 4.2 c | 19.5 ± 8.5 a,b | 15.4 ± 3.1 b,c | 33.5 ± 13.7 a |
| Lycopene intake (mg/day) | nd | 3.7 ± 0.8 | Nd | 4.6 ± 0.6 |
| Excreted lycopene in feces (mg/day) | nd | 1.57 ± 0.4 | Nd | 1.48 ± 0.2 |
| Apparent lycopene absorption (%) | nd | 55.7 ± 15.3 | Nd | 68.1 ± 11.4 |
1 Values are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD). a–c Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences for p < 0.05. * Data estimated as a function of the consumption of feed and its energetic value (N diet: 290 kcal/100 g and H diet: 450 kcal/100 g). ** Data estimated as a function of tomato juice intake and its energetic value (25 kcal/100 mL). NA (normal diet and water), NL (normal diet and tomato juice), HA (hypercholesterolemic diet and water) and HL (hypercholesterolemic diet and tomato juice).
Hepatic content of lycopene metabolites, total lycopene, and its isomers, and liver weight in the four experimental groups, at the end of the 5-week intervention period 1.
| Parameters | NA | NL | HA | HL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-apo-lycopenal | nd | nd | Nd | nd |
| 8-apo-lycopenal | nd | nd | Nd | nd |
| 12-apo-lycopenal | nd | nd | Nd | nd |
| 9- | nd | 0.54 ± 0.10 | Nd | 0.81 ± 0.15 |
| 13- | nd | 0.51 ± 0.26 * | Nd | 0.25 ± 0.12 |
| nd | 1.71 ± 0.30 | Nd | 3.49 ± 1.79 * | |
| Total lycopene (µg/g) | nd | 2.75 ± 0.33 | Nd | 4.55 ± 0.80 * |
| Liver weight (g) | 11.91 ± 1 b | 12.82 ± 1.31 b | 22.74 ± 2.66 a | 24.12 ± 2.72 a |
1 Values are given as mean ± SD. * Indicates a statistically significant difference between the NL and HL groups according to a paired t-test (p < 0.05). a,b Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences for p < 0.05.
Figure 1Light microscopic study of liver samples of animals of the four experimental groups (H–E x20; pictures (a–d), and H–E x40; pictures (e,f)). Pictures (a) and (b) show a normal liver structure. Pictures (c), (d), (e), and (f) show vacuolar degeneration of hepatocytes in groups HA and HL, due to the accumulation of fat. In HA, large vacuolar formations can be identified in some areas, whereas in HL there is a distribution of small droplets of fat.
Final plasma biochemical parameters, hepatic enzyme activities, and concentrations of urinary isoprostanes analyzed in the four experimental groups after the 5-week intervention period (NA: normal diet and water, NL: normal diet and tomato juice as drink, HA: hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and water, HL: hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and tomato juice).1
| Parameters | NA | NL | HA | HL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 136 ± 23 | 142 ± 40 | 158 ± 29 | 154 ± 33 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 105 ± 24 b,c | 85 ± 20 c | 140 ± 42 a,b | 164 ± 12 a |
| LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 36 ± 9 b | 39 ± 9 b | 98 ± 28 a | 89 ± 9 a |
| HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 44 ± 9 | 33 ± 6 | 30 ± 4 | 34 ± 5 |
| VLDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 13 ± 2 b | 11 ± 3 b | 20 ± 4 a | 24 ± 5 a |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 66 ± 17 b | 63 ± 16 b | 98 ± 15 a | 110 ± 12 a |
| ALT (U/L) | 39 ± 5 b | 48 ± 15 b | 80 ± 2 a | 97 ± 29 a |
| AST (U/L) | 65 ± 9 b | 76 ± 14 b | 124 ± 20 a | 132 ± 24 a |
| Urinary isoprostanes (pg/mL) | 940 ± 86 b | 904 ± 55 b | 1303 ± 359 a | 1739 ± 200 a |
1 Values are given as mean ± SD. a–c Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences for p < 0.05.
Concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) and redox ratios in the liver of the rats of the four experimental groups (NA: normal diet and water, NL: normal diet and tomato juice as drink, HA: hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and water, and HL: hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and tomato juice). 1.
| Parameters | NA | NL | HA | HL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA (nmol/mg of protein) | 0.028 ± 0.003 b | 0.031 ± 0.003 b | 0.10± 0.02 a | 0.12 ± 0.02 a |
| GSH/GSSG | 0.188 ± 0.028 b | 0.252 ± 0.030 a | 0.114 ± 0.022 c | 0.136 ± 0.017 c |
| NAD/NADH | 2.3 ± 0.44 | 2.09 ± 0.49 | 2.76 ± 0.62 | 2.93 ± 0.89 |
1 Values are given as mean ± SD. a,b Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences for p < 0.05.
Gene symbol, gene title, and relative fold change for the genes that showed an over or down expression value higher than 1.5 (p < 0.05) in the rat livers 1.
| Symbol | Gene Name | NL–NA | HA–NA | HL–NA | HL–HA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2 | - | 4.51 | - | - |
|
| Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a, liver | - | 2.52 | - | - |
|
| Acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1, palmitoyl | 1.90 | - | - | - |
|
| |||||
|
| ATP-binding cassette, subfamily A (ABC1), member 1 | - | 2.39 | - | - |
|
| 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase | - | 1.52 | - | - |
|
| CD36 molecule (thrombospondin receptor) | 5.84 | −3.28 | 4.23 | - |
|
| Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma | - | 1.64 | - | - |
|
| ATP-binding cassette, subfamily G, member 1 | - | 2.43 | - | - |
|
| Cytochrome P450, family 7, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 | 1.52 | 1.51 | - | - |
|
| Leptin receptor | - | 2.43 | - | - |
|
| Nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group H, member 2 | 1.66 | −1.68 | - | - |
|
| Nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group H, member 4 | - | - | - | 1.80 |
|
| Sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2 | 2.27 | - | - | - |
|
| Apolipoprotein B | −6.43 | 6.80 | −4.66 | - |
|
| |||||
|
| Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1 | 2.09 | - | - | - |
|
| Lipoprotein lipase | −4.05 | 6.22 | −3.33 | - |
|
| Acyl-coa synthetase long-chain family member 5 | −1.64 | 1.90 | - | - |
|
| Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase homolog 2 (mouse) | - | 1.51 | - | - |
|
| Pyrophosphatase (inorganic) 1 | - | −2.20 | 3.57 | - |
|
| Fatty acid binding protein 5, epidermal | - | - | 2.99 | - |
|
| Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4, alpha | - | - | 1.76 | 1.79 |
|
| Interleukin 10 | 2.83 | - | - | - |
1 The fold change for each gene in groups HA, HL, and NL was calculated taking as reference a value of 1 for the group NA. For comparison, HA vs. HL reference values of 1 have been given to group HA.
Figure 2Relevant amino acids concentrations in liver of rats of the four experimental groups (NA: normal diet and water, NL: normal diet and tomato juice as drink, HA: hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and water, HL: hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and tomato juice). Concentration values are given in nmol/g, as mean ± SD. a–c Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 3(a) Antioxidant and (b) nuleotide compounds in the liver of rats of the four experimental groups (NA: normal diet and water, NL: normal diet and tomato juice as drink, HA: hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and water, HL: hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and tomato juice). The bar height indicates the mean value for each group and the error bar indicates the standard deviation. a–c Diferent letters indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Schematic representation of the changes in the expression of genes involved in fatty liver disease after administering (a) a hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and water, (b) a normal diet and tomato juice, and (c) a hypercholesterolemic and high-fat diet and tomato juice to a murine model. FA: fatty acids, TG: triglycerides, VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein, Chol: cholesterol, MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids. The continuous arrows indicate the flow of metabolites, the dashed arrows represent upregulation or downregulation, and the genes are represented as gray ovals. The genes are listed in Table 4.