| Literature DB >> 28028366 |
Wei Jiang1, Mei-Hua Guo1, Xin Hai1.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the hepatoprotective effect of lycopene (Ly) on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in rat.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Cytochrome P450 2E1; Hepatoprotective; Lycopene; Non-alcoholic fatty liver
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28028366 PMCID: PMC5155177 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i46.10180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Figure 1Effects of lycopene on body weight (A) and liver coefficient (B). bP < 0.01 vs control group; cP < 0.05, dP < 0.01 vs model group. Ly: Lycopene.
Effect of lycopene on serum liver function markers and blood lipid levels
| Control | 16.72 ± 2.62 | 60.65 ± 6.28 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.81 ± 0.06 |
| Model | 61.25 ± 13.55 | 162.17 ± 35.53 | 1.38 ± 0.21 | 3.04 ± 0.72 |
| Ly 5 mg/kg | 30.90 ± 3.84 | 95.91 ± 13.65 | 1.02 ± 0.10 | 2.31 ± 0.24 |
| Ly 10 mg/kg | 26.33 ± 2.06 | 88.53 ± 9.18 | 0.75 ± 0.06 | 2.00 ± 0.12 |
| Ly 20 mg/kg | 20.77 ± 3.52 | 78.44 ± 9.79 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 1.83 ± 0.15 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 12) for each group.
P < 0.01 vs control group;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs model group. Ly: Lycopene; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; TG: Triglycerides; TC: Total cholesterol.
Effect of lycopene on liver antioxidant enzyme-specific activities, antioxidant and lipid peroxidation levels
| Control | 131.42 ± 16.24 | 6.76 ± 1.54 | 3.46 ± 1.11 |
| Model | 77.70 ± 7.63 | 2.55 ± 0.78 | 7.58 ± 3.10 |
| Ly 5 mg/kg | 90.95 ± 9.56 | 2.68 ± 1.26 | 5.24 ± 1.46 |
| Ly 10 mg/kg | 109.52 ± 11.34 | 3.76 ± 0.91 | 4.13 ± 1.13 |
| Ly 20 mg/kg | 121.25 ± 10.68 | 4.79 ± 1.51 | 3.45 ± 1.39 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 12) for each group.
P < 0.01 vs control group;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs model group. Ly: Lycopene; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; GSH: Glutathione; MDA: Malondialdehyde.
Effect of lycopene on low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol and free fatty acid levels in liver tissue
| Control | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.98 ± 0.10 | 0.82 ± 0.13 |
| Model | 2.48 ± 0.13 | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 2.03 ± 0.15 |
| Ly 5 mg/kg | 1.32 ± 0.10 | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 1.73 ± 0.12 |
| Ly 10 mg/kg | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 1.56 ± 0.10 |
| Ly 20 mg/kg | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 1.34 ± 0.08 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 12) for each group.
P < 0.01 vs control group;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs model group. Ly: Lycopene; LDL-C: Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HDL-C: High density lipoprotein-cholesterol; FFA: Free fatty acid.
Figure 2Appearance of rat liver tissue (A) and histopathological examination by HE (B, 200 ×). I: Control group; II: Model group; III: Ly 5 mg/kg group; IV: Ly 10 mg/kg group; V: Ly 20 mg/kg group. Ly: Lycopene.
Figure 3Representative photographs of immunological histological chemistry examination (200 ×). A: TNF-α; B: CYP2E1. I: Control group; II: Model group; III: Ly 5 mg/kg group; IV: Ly 10 mg/kg group; V: Ly 20 mg/kg group; VI: Quantification of TNF-α (A-VI) and CYP2E1 (B-VI) stained cells. The results are expressed as mean ± SD of 12 rats. bP < 0.01 vs control group; cP < 0.05, dP < 0.01 vs model group. Ly: Lycopene.