Literature DB >> 30199836

Effect of compliant layers within piezoelectric composites on power generation providing electrical stimulation in low frequency applications.

E D Krech1, E S Cadel1, R M Barrett2, E A Friis3.   

Abstract

For patients that use tobacco or have diabetes, bone healing after orthopedic procedures is challenging. Direct current electrical stimulation has shown success clinically to significantly improve bone healing in these difficult-to-fuse populations. Energy harvesting with piezoelectric material has gained popularity in the last decade, but is challenging at low frequencies due to material properties that limit total power generation at these frequencies. Stacked generators have been used to increase power generation at lower voltage levels but have not been widely explored as a load-bearing biomaterial to provide DC stimulation. To match structural compliance levels and increase efficiency of power generation at low frequencies, the effect of compliant layers between piezoelectric discs was investigated. Compliant Layer Adaptive Composite Stacks (CLACS) were manufactured using five PZT discs connected electrically in parallel and stacked mechanically in series with a layer of low modulus epoxy between each disc. The stacks were encapsulated, keeping PZT and overall volume constant. Each stack was electromechanically tested by varying load, frequency, and resistance. As compliant layer thickness increased, power generation increased significantly across all loads, frequencies, and resistances measured. As expected, increase in frequency significantly increased power output for all groups. Similarly, an increase applied peak-to-peak mechanical load also significantly increased power output. The novel use of CLACS for power generation under load and frequencies experienced by typical orthopedic implants could provide an effective method to harvest energy and provide power without the use of a battery in multiple low frequency applications.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; Human powered implants; Low frequency; Piezoelectric composite; Power generation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30199836      PMCID: PMC8670528          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  25 in total

1.  Theoretical study on the static performance of piezoelectric ceramic-polymer composites with 2-2 connectivity.

Authors:  W Cao; Q M Zhang; L E Cross
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Composite piezoelectric spinal fusion implant: Effects of stacked generators.

Authors:  Nathan C Goetzinger; Eric J Tobaben; John P Domann; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 3.  Electrical Stimulation and Bone Healing: A Review of Current Technology and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Jawad M Khalifeh; Zohny Zohny; Matthew MacEwan; Manu Stephen; William Johnston; Paul Gamble; Youchun Zeng; Ying Yan; Wilson Z Ray
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-01-30

4.  Theoretical model of a piezoelectric composite spinal fusion interbody implant.

Authors:  Nicholas E Tobaben; John P Domann; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  The impact of diabetes on patient outcomes after ankle fracture.

Authors:  Shanti P Ganesh; Ricardo Pietrobon; William A C Cecílio; Deng Pan; Nina Lightdale; James A Nunley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Spinal loads and trunk muscles forces during level walking - A combined in vivo and in silico study on six subjects.

Authors:  Rizwan Arshad; Lorenza Angelini; Thomas Zander; Francesca Di Puccio; Marwan El-Rich; Hendrik Schmidt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Piezoelectric ceramic implants: a feasibility study.

Authors:  J B Park; A F von Recum; G H Kenner; B J Kelly; W W Coffeen; M F Grether
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1980-05

8.  Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.

Authors:  James A Browne; Chad Cook; Ricardo Pietrobon; M Angelyn Bethel; William J Richardson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Early effects of electrical stimulation on osteogenesis.

Authors:  K Yonemori; S Matsunaga; Y Ishidou; S Maeda; H Yoshida
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The Effect of Smoking on Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Daniel Berman; Jonathan H Oren; John Bendo; Jeffrey Spivak
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-11-28
View more
  2 in total

1.  Design considerations for piezoelectrically powered electrical stimulation: The balance between power generation and fatigue resistance.

Authors:  Ember D Krech; Leighton J LaPierre; Safakcan Tuncdemir; A Erkan Gurdal; Evan G Haas; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-11-23

2.  Stacked PZT Discs Generate Necessary Power for Bone Healing through Electrical Stimulation in a Composite Spinal Fusion Implant.

Authors:  Eileen S Cadel; Ember D Krech; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.