Literature DB >> 8853862

Early effects of electrical stimulation on osteogenesis.

K Yonemori1, S Matsunaga, Y Ishidou, S Maeda, H Yoshida.   

Abstract

The mechanism by which electrical stimulation causes osteogenesis is unknown. Bone marrow of the rabbit was stimulated by direct electrical current or electromagnetic fields to clarify the mechanism of osteogenesis by electrical stimulation. A total of 105 rabbits were separated into five groups: a direct current stimulation by Kirshner wire insertion group; a pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation (PEMF) group; a PEMF with Kirshner wire insertion group; a Kirshner wire insertion group; and an intramedullary drilling control group. Measurement of intramedullary new bone formation and determination of alkaline phosphatase activity within the bone marrow were performed. Argylophilic nuclear organizer region (AgNOR) staining was done to evaluate the change in proliferative activity of the osteoblasts during electrical stimulation. In the direct current stimulation group and the PEMF accompanied by the insertion of the Kirshner wire group, alkaline phosphatase activity in the bone marrow and AgNOR staining increased at 7 days after surgery. At 14 days after surgery, alkaline phosphatase activity and proliferative activity of osteoblast were significantly higher in these two groups than in the other groups (PEMF group, Kirshner wire insertion alone group, intramedullary drilling group). Intramedullary new bone formation was most active in the direct current stimulation group. Electromagnetic stimulation of the inserted Kirshner wire also promoted bone formation significantly. The Kirshner wire insertion alone group and the intramedullary drilling group showed bone formation, but it was significantly less. Electromagnetic stimulation without the insertion of the Kirshner wire showed little bone formation. These findings revealed that the degree of osteogenesis induced by electrical stimulation is influenced by the tissue environment, and that osteogenesis is promoted markedly when electrical stimulation is provided in the environment of inflammation and reactive cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8853862     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(96)00169-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  21 in total

1.  Decrease in extracellular collagen crosslinking after NMR magnetic field application in skin fibroblasts.

Authors:  I Digel; E Kurulgan; Pt Linder; P Kayser; D Porst; G J Braem; K Zerlin; G M Artmann; A Temiz Artmann
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Electrical polarization of titanium surfaces for the enhancement of osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Robert Rettew; Robert J Butera; Faisal M Alamgir; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 3.  Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Xiaoyan Tang; Shalini V Gohil; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Investigation of In Vitro Bone Cell Adhesion and Proliferation on Ti Using Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Subhadip Bodhak; Susmita Bose; William C Kinsel; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 7.328

5.  Mesenchymal stem cell osteodifferentiation in response to alternating electric current.

Authors:  Courtney M Creecy; Christine F O'Neill; Bernard P Arulanandam; Victor L Sylvia; Christopher S Navara; Rena Bizios
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Effect of low frequency electromagnetic fields on A2A adenosine receptors in human neutrophils.

Authors:  Katia Varani; Stefania Gessi; Stefania Merighi; Valeria Iannotta; Elena Cattabriga; Susanna Spisani; Ruggero Cadossi; Pier Andrea Borea
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Mechanic stress generated by a time-varying electromagnetic field on bone surface.

Authors:  Hui Ye
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Bioelectric analyses of an osseointegrated intelligent implant design system for amputees.

Authors:  Brad M Isaacson; Jeroen G Stinstra; Rob S MacLeod; Joseph B Webster; James P Beck; Roy D Bloebaum
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Nanomaterials and synergistic low-intensity direct current (LIDC) stimulation technology for orthopedic implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Rohan A Shirwaiker; Meghan E Samberg; Paul H Cohen; Richard A Wysk; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.