Literature DB >> 34864397

Design considerations for piezoelectrically powered electrical stimulation: The balance between power generation and fatigue resistance.

Ember D Krech1, Leighton J LaPierre2, Safakcan Tuncdemir3, A Erkan Gurdal3, Evan G Haas4, Paul M Arnold5, Elizabeth A Friis6.   

Abstract

Quality and timing of bone healing from orthopedic surgeries, especially lumbar spinal fusion procedures, is problematic for many patients. To address this issue, clinicians often use electrical stimulation to improve surgery success rates and decrease healing time in patients with increased risk of pseudarthrosis, including smokers and diabetics. Current invasive electrical stimulation devices require an implantable battery and a second surgery for removal. Piezoelectric composites within an interbody implant generate sufficient power under physiologic loads to deliver pulsed electrical stimulation without a battery and have demonstrated promising preclinical bone growth and fusion success. The objective of the current study was to assess the power generation and fatigue resistance of three commercially manufactured piezocomposite configurations in a modified implant design to demonstrate efficacy as a robust biomaterial within osteogenic implants. The three configurations were electromechanically assessed under physiological lumbar loading conditions, and all configurations produced sufficient power to promote bone healing. Additionally, electrical and mechanical fatigue performance was assessed under high load, low cycle conditions. All configurations demonstrated runout with no gross mechanical failure and two configurations demonstrated electrical fatigue resistance. Future piezoelectric implant design decisions should be based on power generation needs to stimulate bone growth, as mechanical fatigue efficacy was proven for all piezocomposite configurations tested.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; Fatigue resistance; Implant design; Piezoelectric composites; Power generation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34864397      PMCID: PMC8792359          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  28 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation therapies for spinal fusions: current concepts.

Authors:  Jean C Gan; Paul A Glazer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Enhancement of fracture-healing.

Authors:  T A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Projection of diabetes burden through 2050: impact of changing demography and disease prevalence in the U.S.

Authors:  J P Boyle; A A Honeycutt; K M Narayan; T J Hoerger; L S Geiss; H Chen; T J Thompson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.

Authors:  James A Browne; Chad Cook; Ricardo Pietrobon; M Angelyn Bethel; William J Richardson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Prevalence of long-bone non-unions.

Authors:  Christopher Tzioupis; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  A gait-powered autologous battery charging system for artificial organs.

Authors:  J F Antaki; G E Bertocci; E C Green; A Nadeem; T Rintoul; R L Kormos; B P Griffith
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1995 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease: still more questions than answers.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Incidence, Costs and Predictors of Non-Union, Delayed Union and Mal-Union Following Long Bone Fracture.

Authors:  Christina L Ekegren; Elton R Edwards; Richard de Steiger; Belinda J Gabbe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  The Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Bone Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Carlos Marin; Frank P Luyten; Bart Van der Schueren; Greet Kerckhofs; Katleen Vandamme
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.