Literature DB >> 28947161

Spinal loads and trunk muscles forces during level walking - A combined in vivo and in silico study on six subjects.

Rizwan Arshad1, Lorenza Angelini2, Thomas Zander1, Francesca Di Puccio3, Marwan El-Rich4, Hendrik Schmidt5.   

Abstract

During level walking, lumbar spine is subjected to cyclic movements and intricate loading of the spinal discs and trunk musculature. This study aimed to estimate the spinal loads (T12-S1) and trunk muscles forces during a complete gait cycle. Six men, 24-33years walk barefoot at self-selected speed (4-5km/h). 3D kinematics and ground reaction forces were recorded using a motion capturing system and two force plates, implemented in an inverse dynamic musculoskeletal model to predict the spinal loads and trunk muscles forces. Additionally, the sensitivity of the intra-abdominal pressure and lumbar segment rotational stiffness was investigated. Peak spinal loads and trunk muscle forces were between the gait instances of heel strike and toe off. In L4-L5 segment, sensitivity analysis showed that average peak compressive, antero-posterior and medio-lateral shear forces were 130-179%, 2-15% and 1-6%, with max standard deviation (±STD) of 40%, 6% and 3% of the body weight. Average peak global muscles forces were 24-55% (longissimus thoracis), 11-23% (iliocostalis thoracis), 12-16% (external oblique), 17-25% (internal oblique) and 0-8% (rectus abdominus) of body weight whereas, the average peak local muscles forces were 11-19% (longissimus lumborum), 14-31% (iliocostalis lumborum) and 12-17% (multifidus). Maximum±STD of the global and local muscles forces were 13% and 8% of the body weight. Large inter-individual differences were found in peak compressive and trunk muscles forces whereas the sensitivity analysis also showed a substantial variation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverse dynamics; Level walking; Musculoskeletal models; Spine loads; Trunk muscles forces

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28947161     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Design considerations for piezoelectrically powered electrical stimulation: The balance between power generation and fatigue resistance.

Authors:  Ember D Krech; Leighton J LaPierre; Safakcan Tuncdemir; A Erkan Gurdal; Evan G Haas; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-11-23

2.  Effect of compliant layers within piezoelectric composites on power generation providing electrical stimulation in low frequency applications.

Authors:  E D Krech; E S Cadel; R M Barrett; E A Friis
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-08-21

3.  Effect of Unilateral Knee Extension Restriction on the Lumbar Region during Gait.

Authors:  Shintaro Nakatsuji; Masayuki Kawada; Yasufumi Takeshita; Yuta Matsuzawa; Kazutaka Hata; Sota Araki; Ryoji Kiyama
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.822

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.