Literature DB >> 30190817

Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it?

Ulrike Leiter1, Thomas Eigentler1, Claus Garbe1.   

Abstract

Follow-up examinations in melanoma aim to detect recurrences or secondary melanomas in an early phase of development. Follow-up guidelines that have been developed in many European countries, the USA and Australia show varying recommendations and are controversial, especially in patients with melanomas of 1.0 mm tumor thickness or less. This group contains 50-70% of all melanoma patients and the majority is unlikely to develop recurrences. On the other hand, within this entity, subgroups at higher risk for recurrences can be defined who require a more intense follow-up. This article discusses recommendations for the frequency, duration and costs of follow-up in low-risk melanoma patients. Patient preferences are addressed and a risk-adapted follow-up scheme is proposed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  costs; follow-up; low risk; melanoma; risk groups

Year:  2014        PMID: 30190817      PMCID: PMC6094616          DOI: 10.2217/mmt.14.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Manag        ISSN: 2045-0885


  79 in total

1.  Costs of the detection of metastases and follow-up examinations in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Konstantinos Lasithiotakis; Thomas K Eigentler; Friedegund Meier; Christoph Meisner; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Skin self-examination and the ABCDE rule in the early diagnosis of melanoma: is the game over? Reply from author.

Authors:  L Titus
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Preoperative imaging for early-stage cutaneous melanoma: predictors, usage, and utility at a single institution.

Authors:  Dana Haddad; Erin M Garvey; Laurie Mihalik; Barbara A Pockaj; Richard J Gray; Nabil Wasif
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  A rational approach to melanoma follow-up in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Scottish Melanoma Group.

Authors:  T J Dicker; G M Kavanagh; R M Herd; T Ahmad; K M McLaren; U Chetty; J A Hunter
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  S100-Beta, melanoma-inhibiting activity, and lactate dehydrogenase discriminate progressive from nonprogressive American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV melanoma.

Authors:  M Deichmann; A Benner; M Bock; A Jäckel; K Uhl; V Waldmann; H Näher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Follow-up in patients with localised primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Anne Brecht Francken; Esther Bastiaannet; Harald J Hoekstra
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Detection of first relapse in cutaneous melanoma patients: implications for the formulation of evidence-based follow-up guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Brecht Francken; Helen M Shaw; Neil A Accortt; Seng-Jaw Soong; Harald J Hoekstra; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Utility of follow-up tests for detecting recurrent disease in patients with malignant melanomas.

Authors:  M Weiss; C L Loprinzi; E T Creagan; R J Dalton; P Novotny; J R O'Fallon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Surgical treatment of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Richard Essner
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Cost-effectiveness of reduced follow-up in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Ulrich R Hengge; Andrea Wallerand; Andreas Stutzki; Norbert Kockel
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.