Literature DB >> 19430406

Costs of the detection of metastases and follow-up examinations in cutaneous melanoma.

Ulrike Leiter1, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Thomas K Eigentler, Friedegund Meier, Christoph Meisner, Claus Garbe.   

Abstract

At present, no universally accepted recommendations exist for cutaneous melanoma follow-up. Various surveillance strategies, some associated with significant cost, others of uncertain value, are routinely used. This study aimed to evaluate of the costs incurred for varied surveillance strategies practiced in Europe and the USA. One thousand nine hundred and sixty-nine cutaneous melanoma patients with stage I-III disease attending the Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen for follow-up between 1996 and 1998 participated in the study. Routine surveillance consisted of cutaneous examination, lymph node and abdomen sonography, chest radiograph (CR) and blood tests. The costs incurred were based upon the 2004 German official scale for medical reimbursement and the 2004 Medicare fee reimbursement schedule (USA). The total charges were based on the number of recurrences detected per stage. Recurrences were detected in 1.5% of patients with stage I, 18.0% in stage II, and 68.6% in stage III. Physical examination was the most effective method, detecting 50.0% of recurrences. Lymph node sonography was effective in stage II-III, detecting 13.2% of recurrences; CR and abdominal sonography, detecting 4.5 and 3.4% of recurrences, were deemed beneficial in stage III. Blood tests detected 1.4% of recurrences and were deemed to be ineffective. Computed tomography scans were valuable in clarifying ambiguous findings and helping to detect 22.5% of recurrences (1.9% in stage I, 1.9% in stage II, and 18.6% in stage III). A risk-adapted surveillance strategy for stage I-II including thorough history, physical examination and lymph node sonography but omitting CR, blood work and abdomen sonography, seems appropriate and cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19430406     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e32831bc41c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  14 in total

1.  Serum-based miRNAs in the prediction and detection of recurrence in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Nathaniel H Fleming; Judy Zhong; Inês Pires da Silva; Eleazar Vega-Saenz de Miera; Bobbi Brady; Sung Won Han; Doug Hanniford; Jinhua Wang; Richard L Shapiro; Eva Hernando; Iman Osman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it?

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Thomas Eigentler; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

Review 3.  Melanoma treatment costs: a systematic review of the literature, 1990-2011.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Florence K Tangka; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kate D Cromwell; Merrick I Ross; Yan Xing; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard E Royal; Anthony Lucci; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Role of serum S100B and PET-CT in follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Barbara Peric; Ivana Zagar; Srdjan Novakovic; Janez Zgajnar; Marko Hocevar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Personalised cancer follow-up: risk stratification, needs assessment or both?

Authors:  T Filleron; F Dalenc; A Kramar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Exploring patterns of recurrent melanoma in Northeast Scotland to inform the introduction a digital self-examination intervention.

Authors:  Rhona Auckland; Patrick Wassell; Susan Hall; Marianne C Nicolson; Peter Murchie
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2014-03-11

8.  The experience of melanoma follow-up care: an online survey of patients in australia.

Authors:  Janine Mitchell; Peta Callaghan; Jackie Street; Susan Neuhaus; Taryn Bessen
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2014-11-19

9.  Estimating the economic costs of skin cancer in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Christopher M Doran; Rod Ling; Joshua Byrnes; Melanie Crane; Andrew Searles; Donna Perez; Anthony Shakeshaft
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Outpatient Follow-up and Secondary Prevention for Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Ryan G Gamble; Daniel Jensen; Andrea L Suarez; Anne H Hanson; Lauren McLaughlin; Jodi Duke; Robert P Dellavalle
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.