Literature DB >> 17910672

Cost-effectiveness of reduced follow-up in malignant melanoma.

Ulrich R Hengge1, Andrea Wallerand, Andreas Stutzki, Norbert Kockel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considerable variability exists in the extent and frequency of follow- up examinations for melanoma patients between different countries, generating significantly different total costs and uncertain clinical benefits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have analyzed the follow-up of melanoma patients under clinical and economic aspects based on the latest recommendations of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the German Dermatologic Society (DDG) in the Düsseldorf cohort of 526 patients (stage IIII) during a 5-year follow-up period. Outcome measures were frequency of metastasis detection, most effective detection method, costs per detected metastasis and cost per quality-adjusted life year.
RESULTS: Structured follow-up detected 17 recurrences in stages I-III. Physical examination and lymph node ultrasound were the only cost-effective methods at all stages, while laboratory studies were generally not cost-effective. The implementation of a reduced, yet medically adequate follow-up reducing chest X-rays, abdominal ultrasound examinations and eliminating blood tests in early stages yielded savings of more than 100,000 euro (120,000 $) annually at a tertiary care university hospital.
CONCLUSION: The implementation of a reduced follow-up for melanoma patients seems not only medically justified but also economically required without adversely affecting patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17910672     DOI: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06454.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges        ISSN: 1610-0379            Impact factor:   5.584


  12 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it?

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Thomas Eigentler; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

2.  Alterations in patient plasma microRNA expression profiles following resection of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Nicholas Latchana; Mallory J DiVincenzo; Kelly Regan; Zachary Abrams; Xiaoli Zhang; Naduparambil K Jacob; Alejandro A Gru; Paolo Fadda; Joseph Markowitz; J Harrison Howard; William E Carson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in patients with melanoma.

Authors:  Janice N Cormier; Robert L Askew
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  Patterns and Timing of Initial Relapse in Pathologic Stage II Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Ann Y Lee; Nicolas Droppelmann; Katherine S Panageas; Qin Zhou; Charlotte E Ariyan; Mary S Brady; Paul B Chapman; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Long-term follow-up for melanoma patients: is there any evidence of a benefit?

Authors:  Natasha M Rueth; Kate D Cromwell; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 6.  Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kate D Cromwell; Merrick I Ross; Yan Xing; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard E Royal; Anthony Lucci; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 7.  A Global Review of Melanoma Follow-up Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon C Trotter; Novie Sroa; Richard R Winkelmann; Thomas Olencki; Mark Bechtel
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-09

8.  Recurrence of Melanoma After Initial Treatment: Diagnostic Performance of FDG PET in Posttreatment Surveillance.

Authors:  Hwan Hee Lee; Jin Chul Paeng; Gi Jeong Cheon; Dong Soo Lee; June-Key Chung; Keon Wook Kang
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Outpatient Follow-up and Secondary Prevention for Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Ryan G Gamble; Daniel Jensen; Andrea L Suarez; Anne H Hanson; Lauren McLaughlin; Jodi Duke; Robert P Dellavalle
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  The MELFO-Study: Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of a Stage-adjusted Reduced Follow-up Schedule in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients-Results after 1 Year.

Authors:  Samantha Damude; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers; Anne Brecht Francken; Sylvia Ter Meulen; Esther Bastiaannet; Harald J Hoekstra
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.