Literature DB >> 24124660

Preoperative imaging for early-stage cutaneous melanoma: predictors, usage, and utility at a single institution.

Dana Haddad1, Erin M Garvey, Laurie Mihalik, Barbara A Pockaj, Richard J Gray, Nabil Wasif.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative imaging for early-stage cutaneous melanoma is not recommended by current guidelines. Our goal was to investigate our institutional usage and utility.
METHODS: Patients with clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma undergoing surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy were identified retrospectively. Any melanoma-related imaging after diagnosis and before surgery was considered a staging study.
RESULTS: Five hundred fifteen studies were performed in 409 of 546 (75%) patients. Chest x-rays was performed in 70% and advanced imaging in 14% (computed tomography imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and positron-emission computed tomography imaging). No metastatic lesions were identified. A Breslow thickness greater than 4 mm (odds ratio = 6.46 vs <1 mm; 95% confidence interval, 2.07 to 20.15) and male sex (odds ratio = 2.62 vs female; 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 5.46) were associated with an increased likelihood of advanced imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative imaging was performed in the majority of patients with node-negative melanoma, with 14% undergoing advanced studies. No metastatic lesions were identified, confirming the limited utility in this setting.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Melanoma; Preoperative imaging; Staging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24124660     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

Review 1.  Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it?

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Thomas Eigentler; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

3.  Prediction of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) positivity in patients with high-risk primary melanoma.

Authors:  Maria Danielsen; Andreas Kjaer; Max Wu; Lea Martineau; Mehdi Nosrati; Stanley Pl Leong; Richard W Sagebiel; James R Miller; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-22

4.  Imaging malignant melanoma with (18)F-5-FPN.

Authors:  Hongyan Feng; Xiaotian Xia; Chongjiao Li; Yiling Song; Chunxia Qin; Qingyao Liu; Yongxue Zhang; Xiaoli Lan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Seau Tak Cheung; Paul Nathan; Rubeta N Matin; Naomi Chuchu; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan E Bayliss; Abha Gulati; Lopa Patel; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Manil Subesinghe; Zoe Traill; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.