Sean P Donahue1, Danielle L Chandler2, Jonathan M Holmes3, Brian W Arthur4, Evelyn A Paysse5, David K Wallace6, David B Petersen7, B Michele Melia2, Raymond T Kraker2, Aaron M Miller8. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: pedig.@jaeb.org. 2. Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 5. Section of Ophthalmology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana. 7. Rocky Mountain Eye Care Associates, Salt Lake City, Utah. 8. Houston Eye Associates, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to 40 prism diopters (PD), and near stereoacuity of at least 400 seconds of arc. METHODS: Random assignment to BLRc or R&R and masked examinations conducted every 6 months after surgery for 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of participants meeting suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as: (1) exotropia of 10 PD or more at distance or near using simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT); or (2) constant esotropia of 6 PD or more at distance or near using SPCT; (3) loss of 2 octaves or more of stereoacuity from baseline, at any masked examination; or (4) reoperation without meeting any of these criteria. RESULTS:Cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 46% (43/101) in the BLRc group versus 37% (33/96) in the R&R group (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6% to 23%). Reoperation by 3 years occurred in 9 participants (10%) in the BLRc group (8 of 9 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria) and in 4 participants (5%) in the R&R group (3 of 4 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria; treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 5%; 95% CI, -2% to 13%). Among participants completing the 3-year visit, 29% (25 of 86) in the BLRc group and 17% (13 of 77) in the R&R group underwent reoperation or met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria at 3 years (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 12%; 95% CI, -1% to 25%). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a statistically significant difference in suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years between children with IXT treated with BLRc compared with those treated with R&R. Based on these findings, we are unable to recommend one surgical approach over the other for childhood IXT.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to 40 prism diopters (PD), and near stereoacuity of at least 400 seconds of arc. METHODS: Random assignment to BLRc or R&R and masked examinations conducted every 6 months after surgery for 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of participants meeting suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as: (1) exotropia of 10 PD or more at distance or near using simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT); or (2) constant esotropia of 6 PD or more at distance or near using SPCT; (3) loss of 2 octaves or more of stereoacuity from baseline, at any masked examination; or (4) reoperation without meeting any of these criteria. RESULTS: Cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 46% (43/101) in the BLRc group versus 37% (33/96) in the R&R group (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6% to 23%). Reoperation by 3 years occurred in 9 participants (10%) in the BLRc group (8 of 9 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria) and in 4 participants (5%) in the R&R group (3 of 4 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria; treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 5%; 95% CI, -2% to 13%). Among participants completing the 3-year visit, 29% (25 of 86) in the BLRc group and 17% (13 of 77) in the R&R group underwent reoperation or met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria at 3 years (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 12%; 95% CI, -1% to 25%). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a statistically significant difference in suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years between children with IXT treated with BLRc compared with those treated with R&R. Based on these findings, we are unable to recommend one surgical approach over the other for childhood IXT.
Authors: Deborah Buck; Christine J Powell; John J Sloper; Robert Taylor; Peter Tiffin; Michael P Clarke Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Tomohiko Yamada; Elizabeth A Bradley; Stephen R Cole; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Michael X Repka; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Sean P Donahue; Darren L Hoover; Brian G Mohney; Paul H Phillips; Ann U Stout; Benjamin H Ticho; David K Wallace Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jonathan M Holmes; Amra Hercinovic; B Michele Melia; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Danielle L Chandler; Trevano W Dean; Raymond T Kraker; Laura B Enyedi; David K Wallace; Sean P Donahue; Susan A Cotter Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Jonathan M Holmes; Amra Hercinovic; B Michele Melia; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Danielle L Chandler; Trevano W Dean; Raymond T Kraker; Laura B Enyedi; David K Wallace; Brian G Mohney; Susan A Cotter Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 1.220